ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:59 pm wrote:We refuse to stump up the £17m schalke want for one of the top young defenders in europe and then we lose out on the one marquee name we have been seriously linked with all summer. I know its early days but we dont seem to be acting like a club on a mission to break into the top 4 next season.
Reg » Sat Jul 06, 2013 10:18 am wrote:Which other club has done better than us? Citeh? Utd? Bitters? Spurs? Nope. We're the only ones out there buying anyway, against the flow, most clubs are reducing the wage bill and battening down the hatches in the current economic environment.
Reg » Sat Jul 06, 2013 1:10 pm wrote:You miss the point, Liverpool are demonstrating its a buyers market not a sellers, we don't need to splash out, there are few alternative buyers.
kartiek » Sat Jul 06, 2013 5:18 pm wrote:Spot on Doeboy. Feeling a tad pessimistic and upset about the whole situation lately
Benny The Noon » Sat Jul 06, 2013 5:26 pm wrote:Reg » Sat Jul 06, 2013 10:18 am wrote:Which other club has done better than us? Citeh? Utd? Bitters? Spurs? Nope. We're the only ones out there buying anyway, against the flow, most clubs are reducing the wage bill and battening down the hatches in the current economic environment.
Both City and Spurs have bought proven quality international players so far, Chelsea have also made a couple of quality buys. The clubs above us are buying not reducing wage bills.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests