SouthCoastShankly » Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:22 pm wrote:Benny The Noon » Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:49 pm wrote:ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:33 pm wrote:i cant see brendan leaving tbh, he seems the loyal type.
the owners had to move heaven and earth to get him here in the first place.
you`d think a move from swansea to liverpool would be a no brainer for a manager but i seem to recall him distancing himself from that infamous shortlist (the one that dave whelan kept us updated on) and made it pretty clear that he was quite prepared to stay in south wales.
i dont think city (or any club owned by ridiculously wealthy owners) is the sort of place managers tend to hang around for any great length of time and i think rodgers see`s himself more as a shankly/paisley/busby/ferguson/wenger type dynasty builder as opposed to a club hopper like mourinho.
i could be wrong like but my gut feeling is that he`ll stay.
Rodgers would leave us to go to City just like he left Swansea to come to us.
City arent Chelsea - they have just spent a fortune on their academy to build a future and got someone like Bergesten into the club.
But City won't go near Rodgers because he is unproven and untested at the top level. They will be setting their sights higher.
They will look towards managers we should have last summer - Klopp , Laudrup , Pellegrini and possibly Rafa. Proven quality managers with a CV to back it up
Rodgers wouldn't go.
Why not ?
