Liverpool FC Forum

by **Kharhaz** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:16 pm

So, whats the difference between this case and the George Graham case? Aside from the outcome obviously.

by **metalhead** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:24 pm

Good old England

by **jacdaniel** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:24 pm

Typical, the media creaming themselves for Harry to become England manager now and want rid of Capello.
Reminds me of when the media wanted us to get rid of big bad Rafa and appoint Roy Hodgson

by **stmichael** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:30 pm

what a triffic day

by **red till i die!!** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:40 pm

jacdaniel wrote:Typical, the media creaming themselves for Harry to become England manager now and want rid of Capello.
Reminds me of when the media wanted us to get rid of big bad Rafa and appoint Roy Hodgson

thats the truth.
wouldnt surprise me at all if the media and f.a hound capello out before the euros.

by **Roger Red Hat** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:39 pm

yeah, Harry is a tax dodging tw@t! he's only paid £8 million in taxes and been found not guilty of tax evasion... hang on

by **RedSi35** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:02 pm

5 years and 8 million of tax payers money down the drain.......what was the :censored:

point?

by **Ola Mr Benitez** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:20 pm

dawson99 wrote:
Ola Mr Benitez wrote:I like 'arry. Made up he got off with it.

any reason?

Is it the way he is more dodgy than anyone?

Is it how he leaves a club and they go into administration?

Can't stand the guy

Coz he is a proper old school football guy, who is a brilliant football manager. His record at every club he has been at is amazing.

by **Greavesie** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:31 pm

Capello gone. Have the job Arry lad!

by **SouthCoastShankly** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:14 pm

Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of

To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

by **worcester_red** » Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:24 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

£200,000 gift, feck me the jury must have received a few brown envelopes to reach that conclusion. Of course it was bloody tax evasion Arry is as dodgy as they come.

by **fivecups** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:17 am

worcester_red wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

£200,000 gift, feck me the jury must have received a few brown envelopes to reach that conclusion. Of course it was bloody tax evasion Arry is as dodgy as they come.

Looking forward to seeing the details of this. Agreed Wor it sounds bizarre to me.

by **Roger Red Hat** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:27 am

worcester_red wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

£200,000 gift, feck me the jury must have received a few brown envelopes to reach that conclusion. Of course it was bloody tax evasion Arry is as dodgy as they come.

thats quite a slanderous statement but i look forward to you present your evidence to uncover this scandel...

by **dawson99** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:28 am

and hours after he is aquitted Capello quits. Nothing dodgy in that at all LOL

And we say the rest of the football is crooked

by **SouthCoastShankly** » Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:16 pm

worcester_red wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Hang on a minute. I agree there is an element of To this case but Harry has been acquitted unanimously by a jury. Like it or not the justice system dictates that without sufficient evidence you cannot be convicted.

With the evidence available Harry's legal team have successfully convinced all of the jury that his payments were gifts not business and not subject to income tax.

£200,000 gift, feck me the jury must have received a few brown envelopes to reach that conclusion. Of course it was bloody tax evasion Arry is as dodgy as they come.

You cannot honestly think that 12 randomly selected jurors who voted unanimously for Redknapp were all paid off?

Liverpool FC Forum

Arry redknapp - What a blagger

Who is online