Liverpool FC Forum

by **rocky29** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:41 pm

lakes10 wrote:
rocky29 wrote:i would sell him in january. Theres no point keeping him as he will continually be picking up injuries and i would sell joe cole as well and get a decent winger.

hell thats a bit rash.

look he not having a good time right now but who is not to say that in a few weeks time he is back to himself, ok if he dont pick up them it could be something to look at but only if we have a top striker in mind.

as for cole, i think he is looking better and better, was very good on the ball in the last game and is looking fitter with every game he plays..............ok untill he got hurt lol

look lads you may think im a twit thats fine. He is picking up injuries every other month or so. We depend on him being fit so much. Now can u see why i kept saying we need 2 more fecking strikers. If we had 3 or 4 strikers we could carry him but im telling you it will back fire if we keep him. As for joe cole am sorry waste of time and injury prone as well.

by **damjan193** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:54 pm

I dont usually agree with loons like rocky but he's got a point there. Torres hasent been fit for a long time and has been playing bad for almost an year and a half now. Dont get me wrong I love the guy, but when he's at his best. I'd personaly give him untill the end of this season. If he doesnt improve I'd sell him. I mean, comeon guys, whats the point of keeping a 50 mil striker if he doesnt score goals? But I'd like to point out that I wouldnt let him go unless it's a lot of money, but it seems that City are willing to give those alot of money. For those kind of money with a good manager and a bit of luck we can bring some rising star like Torres was for less than 25 mil and improve on other positions.

by **lakes10** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:00 pm

damjan193 wrote:I dont usually agree with loons like rocky but he's got a point

pmsl "I dont usually agree with loons like rocky "

oh dear, found that so funny i have not read the rest of your post yet lol

by **dawson99** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:02 pm

Is torres one of the best strikers in the world?

If you think yes, then you can't sell, its tha simple

by **tubby** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:34 pm

Torres should not be sold period. He is the best striker in the world in his position. What we need is more strength in depth so that when he is injured we have ample backup. You can't just sell someone because they are injured a lot, you need to make sure there is someone who can slot in when that happens so that the team doesn't suffer.

by **lakes10** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:09 pm

bavlondon wrote:Torres should not be sold period. He is the best striker in the world in his position.

was the best striker in the world in his position.

he is not anymore, just the same as woods is not the best at golf anymore.

Torres will get back to how he was and god i hope it is soon.......as for woods i hope he dont get back to what he was...he will run ou of women soon.

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:16 pm

who could replace him and have the same impact?
until those questions are resolved, he should not be sold. ever.

by **f9Torres** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:19 pm

damjan193 wrote:I dont usually agree with loons like rocky but he's got a point there. Torres hasent been fit for a long time and has been playing bad for almost an year and a half now. Dont get me wrong I love the guy, but when he's at his best. I'd personaly give him untill the end of this season. If he doesnt improve I'd sell him. I mean, comeon guys, whats the point of keeping a 50 mil striker if he doesnt score goals? But I'd like to point out that I wouldnt let him go unless it's a lot of money, but it seems that City are willing to give those alot of money. For those kind of money with a good manager and a bit of luck we can bring some rising star like Torres was for less than 25 mil and improve on other positions.

playing bad for year and half? you must be joking...he was great, till the april knee injury. he had another injuries but he was doing very well. when he came back after the first knee injury he scored 10 goals in 8 matches. yeah very poor. last season, 22 goals in 32 matches. wtf are you talking about mate?

by **rocky29** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:20 pm

i want adam johnson and luis suarez

by **rocky29** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:36 pm

lakes10 wrote:
damjan193 wrote:I dont usually agree with loons like rocky but he's got a point

pmsl "I dont usually agree with loons like rocky "

oh dear, found that so funny i have not read the rest of your post yet lol

i aint a looney pal. I just say what loads of posters are really thinking but havent got the balls to say.

by **stmichael** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:36 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:who could replace him and have the same impact?
until those questions are resolved, he should not be sold. ever.

nail on head.

You don't sell your best player unless you have a more than adequate replacement. bottom line.

by **mart** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:03 pm

stmichael wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:who could replace him and have the same impact?
until those questions are resolved, he should not be sold. ever.

nail on head.

You don't sell your best player unless you have a more than adequate replacement. bottom line.

I get a feeling of Déjà vu.

by **rocky29** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:09 pm

stmichael wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:who could replace him and have the same impact?
until those questions are resolved, he should not be sold. ever.

nail on head.

You don't sell your best player unless you have a more than adequate replacement. bottom line.

you lot havent got a clue this is the last chance we have to get mega bucks for nando. you all know full well his injuries are gona get worse. citeh would pay over 50 million for him.

by **Zidane** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:16 pm

I'm not for selling him but if he were sold I would understand the decision.

by **Ben Patrick** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:22 pm

i wouldnt for one second consider selling him :no

Liverpool FC Forum

Taxi for Torres - judas fecks off to chelsea

Who is online