Liverpool FC Forum

Dundalk wrote:I dont give a fuck if they offer 120 million


What good is it going to do, the money will go back to Twit and , a fraction will be paid of the loans and a fraction will be given to Roy.

As a fan what do you want.....one of the best forwards in the world playing for your team or 80 million or whatever it is going towards the two Americans. At the end of the day the club is still going to be up for sale and nothing will change except we will be down a world class player. If the club was sold and the offer came in then i suppose that would be a different story.

Keep him no matter what the offer because it will make feck all of a difference to out plight

Dundalk wrote:I dont give a fuck if they offer 120 million


What good is it going to do, the money will go back to Twit and , a fraction will be paid of the loans and a fraction will be given to Roy.

As a fan what do you want.....one of the best forwards in the world playing for your team or 80 million or whatever it is going towards the two Americans. At the end of the day the club is still going to be up for sale and nothing will change except we will be down a world class player. If the club was sold and the offer came in then i suppose that would be a different story.

Keep him no matter what the offer because it will make feck all of a difference to out plight

neil wrote:Next person to mention Stephen feckin Ireland gets the bumps

I'd already done it fella sorry  .

bigmick wrote:I'm saying sell at 80 million for a number of reasons. Firstly, I'm making the assumption that the manager gets say 50 millon of it to spend (yes, I know, but before the wrist slashers, head bashers, teeth gnashers and black and white swimming birds take over, lets look at it). Firstly, I don't know how much of it he'd get to spend, but neither does anybody else either, it's just a guess. Secondly, if we didn't spend a good portion of it, then we could definately kiss goodbye to Champions League aspirations.

Anyway, lets run with my 50 mill' theory. Inter Milan showed last season that if you get a big fee in for your best player, you can indeed improve as a team provided you have a top class manager who invests the proceeds wisely. Now obviously Citeh don't give a feck about money, so we ought to be able to stripe them over a barrel for a new striker. How about Adebayor, or Tevez for example? Take 15-18 mill off the fee, and they can pay half his wages? Howzabout Steven Ireland? Take 8 mill off the fee (I know these players are worth more but feck em) and Micah Richards? Knock another five mill off. Tell you what, that Onuha wouldn't go amiss either, throw him in as a freebie and then we're talking....

So lets see, (Mick licks the pen for no apparent reason and smooths out the back of the fag packet for the calculation to take place). Thats:

Tevez or Adebayor (and you lot are paying half his wages for a five year deal).
Steven Ireland.
Micah Richards.
Iffy Onuha or whatever the feck his name is.
And while we're at it, Craig Bellamy for 4 mill ta.
Plus the cash. Now lets see (scribble scribble). I make it 37 million in players, plus 43 million in cash. You want to do a deal or not? The moneymen can have their 30 mill in bung money, which leaves us 13 mill for some walkabout money. Bring it on.

bigmick wrote:Daws we've got a bad experience of selling one of our best players and then spunking a goodly portion of the proceeds on a totally unsuitable replacement, but that doesn't mean it's always that way mate. Teams can grow stronger from selling their best players, it's happened throughout history.

bigmick wrote:I'm not being funny, and I know 90% on here will call me allsorts, but if the bid is 80 million quid then we take it, simple as that.

that's right it's called pimping...

Never sell.. if ya wanna win something, the best must stay !