
City would probably be crazy enough
In and Out wrote:City would probably be crazy enough
Didn't they put in a 45 million pound bid for Raoul Moat?
Aussie Style wrote:At first glance it looks like an off the bone hamstring, which usually means 3+ months on the sidelines.
bavlondon wrote:SouthCoastShankly wrote:Waldo wrote:......................has just pulled up injured AGAIN.
Sell him for 70m and let someone else carry the burden of having superstar who is made of chocolate!!
You fucking mong.
Who pays 70m for an injured player.
City would probably be crazy enough
Anyway any talk of selling him is crazy. He is a top player, he just needs someone else up front with him.
Even still if we got 70 the main question would be how much of that would we get to spend? Probably less than half.
Waldo wrote:bavlondon wrote:SouthCoastShankly wrote:Waldo wrote:......................has just pulled up injured AGAIN.
Sell him for 70m and let someone else carry the burden of having superstar who is made of chocolate!!
You fucking mong.
Who pays 70m for an injured player.
City would probably be crazy enough
Anyway any talk of selling him is crazy. He is a top player, he just needs someone else up front with him.
Even still if we got 70 the main question would be how much of that would we get to spend? Probably less than half.
I was simply going on the figures that have been quoted in the press.
I think the WC has probably convinced Torres to move. He will be bitterly frustrated after a p1ss poor WC topped by ANOTHER injury. The frustration of the WC added to the frustration of the 2009/10 season at Anfield will see Torres look for a fresh start and I can see him moving on!
Benny The Noon wrote:Aussie Style wrote:At first glance it looks like an off the bone hamstring, which usually means 3+ months on the sidelines.
How the hell can you judge that - it could just as easily be a twinge
Waldo wrote:bavlondon wrote:SouthCoastShankly wrote:Waldo wrote:......................has just pulled up injured AGAIN.
Sell him for 70m and let someone else carry the burden of having superstar who is made of chocolate!!
You fucking mong.
Who pays 70m for an injured player.
City would probably be crazy enough
Anyway any talk of selling him is crazy. He is a top player, he just needs someone else up front with him.
Even still if we got 70 the main question would be how much of that would we get to spend? Probably less than half.
I was simply going on the figures that have been quoted in the press.
I think the WC has probably convinced Torres to move. He will be bitterly frustrated after a p1ss poor WC topped by ANOTHER injury. The frustration of the WC added to the frustration of the 2009/10 season at Anfield will see Torres look for a fresh start and I can see him moving on!
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Waldo wrote:bavlondon wrote:SouthCoastShankly wrote:Waldo wrote:......................has just pulled up injured AGAIN.
Sell him for 70m and let someone else carry the burden of having superstar who is made of chocolate!!
You fucking mong.
Who pays 70m for an injured player.
City would probably be crazy enough
Anyway any talk of selling him is crazy. He is a top player, he just needs someone else up front with him.
Even still if we got 70 the main question would be how much of that would we get to spend? Probably less than half.
I was simply going on the figures that have been quoted in the press.
I think the WC has probably convinced Torres to move. He will be bitterly frustrated after a p1ss poor WC topped by ANOTHER injury. The frustration of the WC added to the frustration of the 2009/10 season at Anfield will see Torres look for a fresh start and I can see him moving on!
Sort your life out you idiot
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 77 guests