LFC2007 wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:And to finish up LFC2007 until you express an opinion of your own, I will no longer read your posts, as right now they're a waste of time and energy reading them because I know they have nothing constructive to say.
An opinion of my own?
![]()
I've made many a 'constructive' post in response to the shit you regularly post, unfortunately no matter how thorough I may be, you come back with the same ridiculous and discredited arguments (a good example above).
In conclusion, you're an idiot.
LFC2007 wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:And to finish up LFC2007 until you express an opinion of your own, I will no longer read your posts, as right now they're a waste of time and energy reading them because I know they have nothing constructive to say.
An opinion of my own?
![]()
I've made many a 'constructive' post in response to the shit you regularly post, unfortunately no matter how thorough I may be, you come back with the same ridiculous and discredited arguments (a good example above).
In conclusion, you're an idiot.
Yari7 wrote:god_bless_john_houlding wrote:United spent millions upon millions during the 70s and 80s as well, but didn't win the league. We don't need as much money as you lot like to think.
The 70s and 80s was adifferent era. In this era, witht he big money that teams liek Chelsea and United have spent, we have to spend as well if we wish to keep up.
Unless you are Arsene Wenger and have an eye for young talent second to known
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Well Benitez may be now Wenger but he managed to find Agger for 5 million, Arbeloa for around 2 million I think and Lucas for five million. So there's talent there for little money. Why do we need 30 million on someone when we can find someone better for less than 10 million?
And the 70s and 80s were different eras....you mean talent isn't there anymore because you can only win things with money nowadays. Ah right. No point in youngsters playing anymore then because obviously talent doesn't win you anything.
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:stmichael wrote:Of course football is a completely different game now than it was in eras gone by ffs. In those days you could come up from division 2 and win the league straight away in your first season because the playing field was more level. Now, put yourself in Rafa's shoes.
You have to contend with billionaire owners, clubs which have much, much more money than you, with managers that have been with the same club doing the rebuilding job that you have been doing for a fraction of the time with a board who has already tried to replace you just because you called them up on a lie they made.
It's reasonable to assume that, given the fact that we have seen good progress every year so far while winning the biggest competition in club football, given 10 years Rafa will have done more for us than Wenger and in 20 years done more than Ferguson.
However, some people in this day and age want instant success, which can only be done if you have an Abramovic due to the fact that 3 clubs are streets ahead of you on monetary terms and squad development.
Ambrovich was the owner of Chelsea in 03/04 but they didn't win the league. Ambrovich is the owner of Chelsea this season, yet again don't look as if they'll win the league. Money ehQPR are owned by a man richer than Ambrovich, have been the biggest spenders outside of the prem this year, yet are still some way off making a playoff place nevermind an automatic promotion. Money eh
Bristol City were promoted from League 1 last year and find themselves second in the championship this year. Which proves that it is possible to do well after promotions. This isn't a one off either as Yeovil managed consecutive promotions under Gary Johnson. Carlise also managed it under Martin Allen.
I don't class as 9 points behind and the winners of the FA Cup to 21 points behind and champions league finalists as progress. Also up until this current run of seven straight wins, we were going backwards. So I don't think we have progressed to the standard some believe.
Here we go again with time. Ramos has been managing Spurs for less time than Coppell at Reading, but Spurs are above Reading aren't they? The same goes for Steve Bruce at Wigan. They're also above Reading despite having a manager in charge for a shorter period of time. But I forgot time only excuses Benitez doesn't it? Silly me.
Four years isn't long enough for Benitez? OK, so we give him the ten years you suggested. Won't Fergie (who doesn't look like he'll ever retire) and Wenger (who could still easily be at Arsenal) have been in charge longer so what difference will it make then? United will still be outspending us in 10 years as they are now, so what difference will it make? So if we can't win the league because teams outspend us or have managers who've been in charge of their clubs for longer than Benitez, we'll never win the league.
And to finish up LFC2007 until you express an opinion of your own, I will no longer read your posts, as right now they're a waste of time and energy reading them because I know they have nothing constructive to say.
Title? Possiblility? Sorry I ever started this thread, should have known better. 200-1 now should be 1000-1
chrisrafman wrote:8 points behind. 8 games left. We are in unbelivable form with every chance of taking maximum points at Emirates and Old Trafford. Can a miracle happen? Me thinks maybe. You?
bavlondon wrote:chrisrafman wrote:8 points behind. 8 games left. We are in unbelivable form with every chance of taking maximum points at Emirates and Old Trafford. Can a miracle happen? Me thinks maybe. You?
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 119 guests