s@int wrote:My own view is that by restricting substitutions to 60mins and over it gives the opposition an advantage as knowledge is power and if you know when opposition changes are going to be made you can act or react accordingly.
Secondly it is obviously a great advantage to make important changes at half time as you can explain to the players just how the change is going to affect each player, and rather than the sub spending 5mins running round explaining to the rest of the team just what role he will be playing and how their role may have changed, it can all be sorted in the dressing room.
My own criticism is that not only does he often wait too long before making his subs when we are chasing the game, but that often he changes like for like rather than making a more bold statement by exchanging a defender for a midfield player or throwing on an extra striker. Admittedly with the quality of Liverpools bench this hasn't been as great a problem this season!
I do think that when things are obviously not working an early change would be welcome and might make the difference between getting a result and coming away with nothing.
Agreed and also fact that he always does it around same time is playing to a pattern and is easy to counter if he made a change at half time the other manager wouldn't have any time to responed and he be able to effect the game for a 5-10 min time once game restarts.
I am not saying never wait to 60-70 mins just if you 2-0 down and the players are not doing a good job change it ffs.
Look at CL final 2005 he made a change at half time and in that 20 min time frame after the change we really turned the game on its head but did rafa learn from that like feck he did.
There is having trust in your players then there is not knowing when they are not going to play to form.