Lando_Griffin wrote:Either way, they'll still be thinking about the Spaniel...
Cocker?

heimdall wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:teamleader1 wrote:Benetez is our biggest liability this season, it looks very much like hes holding a personel grudge against Keane, just like he did with Alonso
Prove it, or shut it, you tit.
Well done Lando for proving Big Mick so wrong about the pro-rafalites being rude and aggressive to the anti's.![]()
I'm very disappointed with the result especially since Rafa still continues to play Dossena whilst everybody knows he is terrible. Also not bringing on Keane for Kuyt when Kuyt was clearly having a bad game is terrible management, oh dear, there I said it, I'm no longer a fan now am I![]()
Tell you what, if you think Rafa was right to play Dossena and not bring on Keane why don't you please let us know what his thinking was.
Lando_Griffin wrote:Heimdall - at times, it is possible to have a reasoned conversation with someone. You are able to put your point across, they theirs, and then you come to some kind of understanding.
Then you have conversations with people so blinded by hate and a desperate desire to be proved right that they wish for the team to lose. In these circumstances, the only way to get through to them is to say; "Sh*t up, you c*nt."
Can you guess which approach I favour with you?
bigmick wrote:Well whether or not you choose to believe me Lando, I do quite like RafaI think he's broadly done a decent job, I've said so many times. Had we not fecked around with mass rotation for four seasons this wouldn't be our first title challenge underhis tenure, he has made some fine signings and some excellent decisions. He's probably the best defensive coach around I reckon, and I think he acts in the main in a dignified manner which is becoming of a Liverpool manager.
I do though ask the question about certain decisions which I think are wrong. Not bringing Keane on as sub was nothing to do with tactics, it was about making a point. I say that to be kind to the manager, because if he's just spent 20 million quid on a striker who was incapable of being an improvement on what Dirk Kuyt was offering on Saturday, then his judgement is terrible and he is an idiot. We know though that his judgement isn't terrible (Dossena aside) and that Keane is a better striker than Kuyt. That he didn't bring him on is a metter of fact, and I guess till the books come out we'll never know why. My contention is though that whatever point he was making, wasn't important enough to put the team getting three points at more risk than was necessary, which it did.
I retain the perogative to make such points on here, despite "quite" liking the manager.
Lando_Griffin wrote:bigmick wrote:Well whether or not you choose to believe me Lando, I do quite like RafaI think he's broadly done a decent job, I've said so many times. Had we not fecked around with mass rotation for four seasons this wouldn't be our first title challenge underhis tenure, he has made some fine signings and some excellent decisions. He's probably the best defensive coach around I reckon, and I think he acts in the main in a dignified manner which is becoming of a Liverpool manager.
I do though ask the question about certain decisions which I think are wrong. Not bringing Keane on as sub was nothing to do with tactics, it was about making a point. I say that to be kind to the manager, because if he's just spent 20 million quid on a striker who was incapable of being an improvement on what Dirk Kuyt was offering on Saturday, then his judgement is terrible and he is an idiot. We know though that his judgement isn't terrible (Dossena aside) and that Keane is a better striker than Kuyt. That he didn't bring him on is a metter of fact, and I guess till the books come out we'll never know why. My contention is though that whatever point he was making, wasn't important enough to put the team getting three points at more risk than was necessary, which it did.
I retain the perogative to make such points on here, despite "quite" liking the manager.
Do you think you would agree with any other manager's decisions 100% of the time?
Whilst any other team's fans would be basking in our obvious progress, some seem more interested in saving face.
Why?
bigmick wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:bigmick wrote:Well whether or not you choose to believe me Lando, I do quite like RafaI think he's broadly done a decent job, I've said so many times. Had we not fecked around with mass rotation for four seasons this wouldn't be our first title challenge underhis tenure, he has made some fine signings and some excellent decisions. He's probably the best defensive coach around I reckon, and I think he acts in the main in a dignified manner which is becoming of a Liverpool manager.
I do though ask the question about certain decisions which I think are wrong. Not bringing Keane on as sub was nothing to do with tactics, it was about making a point. I say that to be kind to the manager, because if he's just spent 20 million quid on a striker who was incapable of being an improvement on what Dirk Kuyt was offering on Saturday, then his judgement is terrible and he is an idiot. We know though that his judgement isn't terrible (Dossena aside) and that Keane is a better striker than Kuyt. That he didn't bring him on is a metter of fact, and I guess till the books come out we'll never know why. My contention is though that whatever point he was making, wasn't important enough to put the team getting three points at more risk than was necessary, which it did.
I retain the perogative to make such points on here, despite "quite" liking the manager.
Do you think you would agree with any other manager's decisions 100% of the time?
Whilst any other team's fans would be basking in our obvious progress, some seem more interested in saving face.
Why?
100% of the time? Not a chance. Ask any two people who have an interest about football a number of questions and they'll NEVER agree 100%. That's one of the reasons I find it so odd when people get so fired up if you dare to say you disagree with the manager on any issue.
As for the "basking in our obvious progress" bit, I am just about the only poster on here who thinks we were goiod enough to launch a title challenge in each of the last three seasons, not just this one. In many ways, I've been Rafa's biggest advocate strange as it may seem.
And as for saving face, it's never really been important to me but since you bring it up, it would be difficult for anyone to say I was 100% wrong about mass rotation surely? I said if we cut back we'd challenge, we've cut back and we're challenging.
I love us being top as much as the next man, except I want us to actually win it and when something happens which I think is detrimental to our chances I'll say so. If we win it, people can argue till the cows come home about who's saved face, who was right all along, who called it totally wrong and all that old sh!t. I personally couldn't give a feck, just so long as we win it. Step one is giving ourselves the very best opportunity.
bigmick wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:bigmick wrote:Well whether or not you choose to believe me Lando, I do quite like RafaI think he's broadly done a decent job, I've said so many times. Had we not fecked around with mass rotation for four seasons this wouldn't be our first title challenge underhis tenure, he has made some fine signings and some excellent decisions. He's probably the best defensive coach around I reckon, and I think he acts in the main in a dignified manner which is becoming of a Liverpool manager.
I do though ask the question about certain decisions which I think are wrong. Not bringing Keane on as sub was nothing to do with tactics, it was about making a point. I say that to be kind to the manager, because if he's just spent 20 million quid on a striker who was incapable of being an improvement on what Dirk Kuyt was offering on Saturday, then his judgement is terrible and he is an idiot. We know though that his judgement isn't terrible (Dossena aside) and that Keane is a better striker than Kuyt. That he didn't bring him on is a metter of fact, and I guess till the books come out we'll never know why. My contention is though that whatever point he was making, wasn't important enough to put the team getting three points at more risk than was necessary, which it did.
I retain the perogative to make such points on here, despite "quite" liking the manager.
Do you think you would agree with any other manager's decisions 100% of the time?
Whilst any other team's fans would be basking in our obvious progress, some seem more interested in saving face.
Why?
100% of the time? Not a chance. Ask any two people who have an interest about football a number of questions and they'll NEVER agree 100%. That's one of the reasons I find it so odd when people get so fired up if you dare to say you disagree with the manager on any issue.
As for the "basking in our obvious progress" bit, I am just about the only poster on here who thinks we were goiod enough to launch a title challenge in each of the last three seasons, not just this one. In many ways, I've been Rafa's biggest advocate strange as it may seem.
And as for saving face, it's never really been important to me but since you bring it up, it would be difficult for anyone to say I was 100% wrong about mass rotation surely? I said if we cut back we'd challenge, we've cut back and we're challenging.
I love us being top as much as the next man, except I want us to actually win it and when something happens which I think is detrimental to our chances I'll say so. If we win it, people can argue till the cows come home about who's saved face, who was right all along, who called it totally wrong and all that old sh!t. I personally couldn't give a feck, just so long as we win it. Step one is giving ourselves the very best opportunity.
bigmick wrote:No, I couldn't give two fecks how we win it. I'm not bothered that we're playing sh!t, I AM bothered that we can't win at home. If we were playingat home but still winning, I wouldn't give a feck. The reason I am bothered despite the other teams also dropping points, is that we are ticking off very winnable games here and only getting one point a time. There WILL come a point where we have tougher fixtures, and lose a couple of matches. We may well pay for the fact that we failed to win our most winnable fixtures.
I don't give a sh!t about Robbie Keane the person, I'm sure he's a nice bloke and all that but I've never met him. The reason I think he should have played/come on as sub on saturday is because I think if he had, we'd have had more chance of winning the match.
s@int wrote:bigmick wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:bigmick wrote:Well whether or not you choose to believe me Lando, I do quite like RafaI think he's broadly done a decent job, I've said so many times. Had we not fecked around with mass rotation for four seasons this wouldn't be our first title challenge underhis tenure, he has made some fine signings and some excellent decisions. He's probably the best defensive coach around I reckon, and I think he acts in the main in a dignified manner which is becoming of a Liverpool manager.
I do though ask the question about certain decisions which I think are wrong. Not bringing Keane on as sub was nothing to do with tactics, it was about making a point. I say that to be kind to the manager, because if he's just spent 20 million quid on a striker who was incapable of being an improvement on what Dirk Kuyt was offering on Saturday, then his judgement is terrible and he is an idiot. We know though that his judgement isn't terrible (Dossena aside) and that Keane is a better striker than Kuyt. That he didn't bring him on is a metter of fact, and I guess till the books come out we'll never know why. My contention is though that whatever point he was making, wasn't important enough to put the team getting three points at more risk than was necessary, which it did.
I retain the perogative to make such points on here, despite "quite" liking the manager.
Do you think you would agree with any other manager's decisions 100% of the time?
Whilst any other team's fans would be basking in our obvious progress, some seem more interested in saving face.
Why?
100% of the time? Not a chance. Ask any two people who have an interest about football a number of questions and they'll NEVER agree 100%. That's one of the reasons I find it so odd when people get so fired up if you dare to say you disagree with the manager on any issue.
As for the "basking in our obvious progress" bit, I am just about the only poster on here who thinks we were goiod enough to launch a title challenge in each of the last three seasons, not just this one. In many ways, I've been Rafa's biggest advocate strange as it may seem.
And as for saving face, it's never really been important to me but since you bring it up, it would be difficult for anyone to say I was 100% wrong about mass rotation surely? I said if we cut back we'd challenge, we've cut back and we're challenging.
I love us being top as much as the next man, except I want us to actually win it and when something happens which I think is detrimental to our chances I'll say so. If we win it, people can argue till the cows come home about who's saved face, who was right all along, who called it totally wrong and all that old sh!t. I personally couldn't give a feck, just so long as we win it. Step one is giving ourselves the very best opportunity.
Spot on Mick. Did everyone always agree with Shanks , Paisley, Dalglish ......... no. They got things wrong, they made mistakes just as Rafa does.
It makes me laugh when I read some of the rubbish spouted on here at times. If we were at the game, you back the team 100%, once the game is over you go to the pub and discuss the game. You discuss the ref, the players AND the managers decisions.
That's not being disloyal thats being a normal football fan. Same on here, I am sure if Rafa came onto the site people would be a little more circumspect in their posts, as he doesn't we are more open about our views. I thought that was the idea of a football forum, that people could express their views?
Or maybe we should all be sat writing how happy we were to draw another home match. How we think that every decision Rafa makes is sheer genius and every player we have is the best in the world.
Sadly not every player we have is the best in the world and Rafa makes mistakes just like any other human being.
To say that people are "picking on Rafa because of where he comes from" is idiotic. How come Torres seems to have universal approval across the site if thats the case? I think its more due to the fact that he knocks goals in for fun rather than where he comes from which matters.
We are writing posts on a football forum, they have no impact whatsoever on Rafa. If our posts mattered in the slightest outside this forum I am sure Hicks and Gillett would be out on their ear already and DIC busy building our new stadium.
Some people need to take a chill pill relax and enjoy the football debate rather than worrying if someone doesn't like Rafa. We are not kids, "if you don't like my friend I am not playing with you"![]()
BTW TOP OF THE LEAGUE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH! League champions IS good enough. If and when we achieve that .... then its a job well done. You get nothing for being top in December, but a nice shiny cup for winning the League.
Bam wrote:Its funny how you cannot question or critise the manager without being lablelled a greedy little fecker who doesnt deserve to see Liverpool win anything.
Is this some kind of thing where your proving how great a supporter you are be agreeing with every decision Rafa's made, you know it doesnt make you a superior supporter in any way shape or form, more of an idiot. If you cant come up you're own opinion and reasoned debate.
I bet any money that Rafa ISNT happy with the dropped points at home to Fulham, West Ham and Hull. He wont be fooled into thinking everything is cushdy, I reckon alarm bells will have started ringing with him because of the fact we cant kill teams off who dont even cost a quarter of the price our squad does.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 206 guests