
Eagle » Thu Feb 04, 2016 11:46 pm wrote:Ultimately for FSG it's about being financially competitive compared to other premier league clubs so the TV money is irrelevant as everyone else has it too. All clubs are trying to increase their commercial and match day revenue. The graph below using last season's figures shows that Arsenal have £43 mil more to play with in terms of wages/transfers annually, Man Utd have £30mil more, and Chelsea £14mil. Chelsea will be building a bigger stadium with more corporate hospitality so they will see a big increase in their match day revenue.
Suggestions are that the main stand development will bring in an additional £25mil a year although for the first 4-5 years this additional revenue will go towards paying back the loan we took from FSG to build the stand in the first place. So we won't see any immediate benefit.
The truth is the right long term decision (50+ years) was too build a much bigger stadium (70,000+), with world class corporate hospitality, and cheaper tickets for the average fan that priced a lot of people back into going games so that we could fill the bigger stadium every game.
ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:46 am wrote:Eagle » Thu Feb 04, 2016 11:46 pm wrote:Ultimately for FSG it's about being financially competitive compared to other premier league clubs so the TV money is irrelevant as everyone else has it too. All clubs are trying to increase their commercial and match day revenue. The graph below using last season's figures shows that Arsenal have £43 mil more to play with in terms of wages/transfers annually, Man Utd have £30mil more, and Chelsea £14mil. Chelsea will be building a bigger stadium with more corporate hospitality so they will see a big increase in their match day revenue.
Suggestions are that the main stand development will bring in an additional £25mil a year although for the first 4-5 years this additional revenue will go towards paying back the loan we took from FSG to build the stand in the first place. So we won't see any immediate benefit.
The truth is the right long term decision (50+ years) was too build a much bigger stadium (70,000+), with world class corporate hospitality, and cheaper tickets for the average fan that priced a lot of people back into going games so that we could fill the bigger stadium every game.
Ticket prices in this country are way too high, fans in Britain pay ten times what they do on the continent, maybe you could just about swallow that unpalatable fact if the likes of Messi, Suarez, Ronaldo, Neymar etc all played here but they don't.
One of the recommendations of the Taylor report after Hillsborough was that stadiums in this country should be all seater but Lord Justice Taylor went to great lengths to stress that the cost shouldn't be palmed off onto the fans, however in the 25 years since the report was released ticket prices here have rocketed by 1000% (yes one thousand percent!).
In Britain supporting a football team is part of the culture and has been for nearly a century and a half and the business world are just exploiting that culture to just charge what they want.
Their rampant greed will eventually make fans disillusioned to the extent they'll fall out of love with the game (it's already happening) which will be akin to cultural vandalism IMO.
johnbarnes » Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:09 pm wrote:I hope Carra was just out getting a bag of chips or something.
---
Why would Carra, a multi-millionaire who has made all of his riches from working at LFC walk out?
As an ex-employee of FSG what the F%$K has it got to do with him?
If it was that important, why does he not set a up a real fans based organisation nationwide with some of his pals? Or donate every cent he has made from his time as a FSG employee back to the fans?
Enjoy your money lad and move on...
...Keep to footie my son; Keep to footie!
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 74 guests