Redman in wales wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Redman in wales wrote:Babel is a good ‘out’ – but I thick pennant can also provide that outlet – okay he is not as fast, but he does keep possession a lot better than babel.
In these types of games though (Inter Milan both legs, Arsenal away, Chelsea home, Man U away, Blackburn first half) he hasn't proved to be a good 'out'. He's struggled in tight spaces, and can be pressured out of possession too easily. He's proven to be effective ad a good 'out' when he has space to run into - and against tired legs/minds/defenders who don't mark tight enough e.g. Arsenal home late on, Bolton away, Newcastle away.
This is my concern, but do we upset the 'cohesion' and 'fluency' this formation, and the personnel within this formation has (apparently) brought us?
I agree that Babel struggles under pressure more than pennant... only when there's space does babel become dangerous.
another thing to note 6 out babels 9 goals have come from him coming on as a sub, his only goals from starts were against Bolton, Luton and Derby. - I think Babel is much more effective as a sub. - and personally I would be willing to risk the cohesion, as I believe it would be for the good of the team.
Babel struggles under pressure? I understand he might've crumbled once or twice. But don't you remember that final goal on Arsenal? I didn't even expect the ball to shoot out until a few steps after.
Did you also forget the way he sifted through Inter?