Fowler - Bring him back

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby 115-1073096938 » Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:26 pm

bigmick wrote:Jeez can everybody stop quoting each other otherwise each post will take up a page.
My take is this. Fowler isn't the player he was when he was in his golden era at Liverpool. I don't think anybody would sensibly dispute that or indeed that anybody is claiming that. So what has he lost from those days, what has he gained and given that he is an inferior player to the world-beater that he was, to what extent have his overall powers diminished?
Clearly he has lost a good deal of his pace. Now it's a bit lazy to say "but he never had any pace". I would accept that he wouldn't have been beating Cisse over 100 yards but he had a sharpness, an explosion over two or three yards which enabled him to get to a a ball first, to get wrong side of a defender or to gain himself an extra yard when he'd wrongfooted a marker with a feint. It doesn't mean that he can no longer do these things, it just means that it's more difficult for him. It also means it's easier for the quicker and stronger defenders to momentarily be fooled by Robbies ability but then regain their position, to get right side.
His awareness like most older players has improved. I'll wager there's ten times a day when Robbie wishes he knew then (in the golden era) what he knows now. His appreciation of others aroud him and intelligence of the game as a whole will be at it's peak in his career.
His fitness has waned somewhat. Mostly because of some crippling injuries and partly I suspect because of his lifestyle away from the game. This would affect his mobility, his ability to work the defenders. Also his strength will have diminished a fair amount, making it more difficult for him to protect the ball when played up to him. His spring would be effected aswell. It's unlikely he would posess quite the same potency in the air as he used to have.
From what I've seen in the last couple of games he retains both his sublimity of touch in it's entireity and his godgiven and unsurpassed finishing ability. He remains one of the sweetest strikers of a football you ever did see and his goal against Manure was absolute poetry in the perfection of it's execution.

So that's my opinions. Not based on what anybody else thinks, my opinions. The conclusion? I think he would have a similar effect on games if he played for us as Morientes does now, except I think he'd probably score more regularly. I think he's past his best and is priobably only 70% of the fantastic player we all remember and I would consider signing him only as a bench-dweller to brought on for the last 20 in games, as much to gee the crowd up as for what he would actually do. Anybody who has read my previous posts would know that I don't think that Morientes will do the business for Liverpool, FWIW I don't think Fowler will either except in the role I have described. We need a fit and firing striker in his prime. If Defoe is the man (and I think he may be) then possibly we could consider Fowler to play mentor to the young fella.

You've spoken sense Mick, yes he's lost half a yard, yes he's lost mobility. No i don't believe he's lost strength at all to be honest.

For me now, he's still 80% of the player he was and would be electric in this Liverpool side. Do i think he'll be man of the match every week? No chance, do i think he'd score 20-25 goals and be our top scorer while positively contributing to open play in as you put it (the same way Morientes does), damn right he would. For me he's still better than Morientes. He's also the STYLE of player we need. I've said in the past you need pace as an option, my attitude has changed slightly was a right winger with Pace and Gerrard is plenty of it. Kewell has a burst still aswell.

Fowler would relish a return to Liverpool, he'll never been the same player he was, only a fool would say that. But by the same token only a fool would say he couldn't and wouldn't score goals in this side. He also has the players to link up with in Kewell, Luis Garcia and Gerrard, players that will be on his wave length.

I'd still put him in the top 10 strikers in the country easily and in the top 5 or 6 english strikers.

Owen, Rooney, Defoe and Ashton are better players. After that i'm struggling.
115-1073096938
 

Postby stmichael » Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:30 pm

i agree that robbie would score a significant number of goals in this liverpool side, despite clearly being somewhat more limited these days than he used to be. we make bucketloads of chances now compared to what we used to and nobody can tell me that robbie isn't a better finisher than any of our strikers. his football brain is still second to none and his positional sense for a striker will always be top class.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby 115-1073096938 » Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:11 pm

stmichael wrote:i agree that robbie would score a significant number of goals in this liverpool side, despite clearly being somewhat more limited these days than he used to be. we make bucketloads of chances now compared to what we used to and nobody can tell me that robbie isn't a better finisher than any of our strikers. his football brain is still second to none and his positional sense for a striker will always be top class.

Thats not right because Norwich, Millwall and Man City don't want him. :laugh:
115-1073096938
 

Postby Ola Mr Benitez » Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:25 pm

Robbie is well past his best, and in my opinion is now not good enough to play for Liverpool.  I think we would all love to think that if he came back he would score a bag load of goals but it will never happen.

Raffa is building for the future and having an ageing player in the team is going to do us no favours in the long or short term.

Robbie will forever be a hero in our past, along with Dalglish, Keegan and Rush.  I think it would be quite sad to see a under par Robbie Fowler playing at Anfield whilst I can still remember what a great he was..
Our job is simple, to support the club, not just parts of the club that are easy to support, but every one who plays a part, that includes ALL players.  We are stronger when we are all walking in the same direction. Walk On
User avatar
Ola Mr Benitez
 
Posts: 2367
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 10:14 am

Postby Ace Ventura » Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:26 pm

bigmick wrote:I think he's past his best and is priobably only 70% of the fantastic player we all remember and I would consider signing him only as a bench-dweller to brought on for the last 20 in games, as much to gee the crowd up as for what he would actually do.

Before the last 2 games for City where he scored a really good Hat-trick and then a typically clinical finish in a massive match i would of thought similary to Kewell_7 that he looks like he might be about finished with the top flight.
But after watchinh his cameo performance against united i have to admit i was really surprised, his movement and touch were first class.
He really held the ball up well and intelligently brought others into play.
His finish was fantastic as well, i was made up for the lad.
The point bigmick has made about geeing the crowd up is a very good one, because anyone who knows the club will realise that the crowd can inspire the players so much.
I think it would be worthwhile bringin him in as a substitute or sometime starter, definately wouldnt really be a risk if its on a free.
Image





ALLLRIGHTY THEN !!
User avatar
Ace Ventura
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3952
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Birkenhead

Postby Effes » Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:33 pm

ivor_the_injun wrote:
Bamaga man wrote:Who do you work for Ivor ?

I'm not getting into that, but just so you don't all get a bit worried, it's not one of Murdoch's, and it's not a red top. And it's not the Mail either. Would hate to think someone thought I worked for that crock of sh*t.

Oh, and just to clarify, I'm not a sports reporter. I'm more of a behind-the-scenes spod. :D

That only leaves the Sunday Sport.

Do you stick cameras up girls skirts?
What a job.
Image
Matt McQueen - Liverpool 1892-1928.
Only professional to - play in goal (41 appearances), Defence, Midfield, Striker, and later be Director and then to be Manager (winning a Championship) - at one club
User avatar
Effes
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4282
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:45 pm
Location: Garston

Postby stmichael » Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:33 pm

Ace Ventura wrote:The point bigmick has made about geeing the crowd up is a very good one, because anyone who knows the club will realise that the crowd can inspire the players so much.
I think it would be worthwhile bringin him in as a substitute or sometime starter, definately wouldnt really be a risk if its on a free.

Yeah there is a lot of belief that Robbie's drop in form after he left Anfield was because he was 'LFC' through and through and his heart just couldn't motivate him on the pitch the same way as when he was wearing the red jersey. Coming back in a 'Super Sub' role might work if this theory is true.

He is obviously not as fit or as mobile as when he was with us and banging in the goals for fun. But maybe if he is motivated and could tolerate being on the bench for long periods, his heart, that has always seemed to be in Liverpool, might carry him through to score some of those late goals that need a clinical finish that we know he can deliver.

Also remember we have just sent Mellor out on loan for the season, so is this to accommodate another striker?  :oops:  :D
Last edited by stmichael on Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby 7_Kewell » Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:51 pm

thats my point....you've just described fowler as a quick footed, mobile goal poacher.  Last time i saw him play last season, he was a shadow of his former self and i don't honestly believe he'll ever be motivated enough to put in the graft to be a player thats 70% of what he use to be.  For me, Fowler and Mcmanaman are silmiar because their careers have both ended (or ending) where they just don't seem interested.  I stand by my point, Fowler isn't, nor ever will be, the player he once was.  Stu seems to think its all to do with Man City's system, but the Fowler of old would have been knocking in 30 goals a season in any team, regardless.
“You cannot transfer the heart and soul of Liverpool Football Club, although I am sure there are many clubs who would like to buy it.”
User avatar
7_Kewell
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13669
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: Here, there, everywhere

Postby Ace Ventura » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:00 pm

stmichael wrote:Yeah there is a lot of belief that Robbie's drop in form after he left Anfield was because he was 'LFC' through and through and his heart just couldn't motivate him on the pitch the same way as when he was wearing the red jersey. Coming back in a 'Super Sub' role might work if this theory is true.

He is obviously not as fit or as mobile as when he was with us and banging in the goals for fun. But maybe if he is motivated and could tolerate being on the bench for long periods, his heart, that has always seemed to be in Liverpool, might carry him through to score some of those late goals that need a clinical finish that we know he can deliver.

Also remember we have just sent Mellor out on loan for the season, so is this to accommodate another striker?  :oops:  :D

My mates bumped into Robbie when Morientes first signed in the News bar in town, he was with Nando Garcia and someone else i cant remember what they said now.

They were talking to Fowler and he was saying he was gutted about not being at anfield and the way he was forced out.

He said he never wanted to play for any other club, and that he would be back at Anfield one day.

He was leathered but thats what he was saying.
As i said if he is on a free and will take a cut in wages, then he would be well worth picking up.
Image





ALLLRIGHTY THEN !!
User avatar
Ace Ventura
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3952
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Birkenhead

Postby Ola Mr Benitez » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:08 pm

Ace Ventura wrote:He was leathered but thats what he was saying.

And that my friends is one of Robbies problems..  A player in his 30's shouldn't be gettingleathered as they need to work twice as hard as everyone else to keep up with the frightening pace of the premieship..
Our job is simple, to support the club, not just parts of the club that are easy to support, but every one who plays a part, that includes ALL players.  We are stronger when we are all walking in the same direction. Walk On
User avatar
Ola Mr Benitez
 
Posts: 2367
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 10:14 am

Postby 7_Kewell » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:12 pm

Ola Mr Benitez wrote:
Ace Ventura wrote:He was leathered but thats what he was saying.

And that my friends is one of Robbies problems..  A player in his 30's shouldn't be gettingleathered as they need to work twice as hard as everyone else to keep up with the frightening pace of the premieship..

he's worth 26 million....thats part of my problem, he doesn't need need the money from football anymore and he's not as good as he was, thats why, like Mcmanaman, i don't think he'll play on for much longer.
“You cannot transfer the heart and soul of Liverpool Football Club, although I am sure there are many clubs who would like to buy it.”
User avatar
7_Kewell
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13669
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: Here, there, everywhere

Postby 115-1073096938 » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:24 pm

7_Kewell wrote: Stu seems to think its all to do with Man City's system, but the Fowler of old would have been knocking in 30 goals a season in any team, regardless.

I think its all down to City's system?

:laugh:

Putting words in my mouth.

And yes, of course he'd score 30 goals in any team. Systems and tactics mean nothing in football do they. Look at Dwight Yorke for gods sake, a very good player at Villa, goes to the mancs and bangs 30 goals in.

Systems and tactics matter a great deal. Look at Sutton at Blackburn, 20 goals, a league winner, look at him at Chelsea, 1 goal in 20.

Don't sit there and say systems and tactics mean nothing. You don't even watch Fowler, why have an opinion on something you know nothing about?

You're a grade "A" arsewhole lad. You don't have clue and your arguement is a joke.
115-1073096938
 

Postby 7_Kewell » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:31 pm

stu_the_red wrote:
7_Kewell wrote: Stu seems to think its all to do with Man City's system, but the Fowler of old would have been knocking in 30 goals a season in any team, regardless.

I think its all down to City's system?

:laugh:

Putting words in my mouth.

And yes, of course he'd score 30 goals in any team. Systems and tactics mean nothing in football do they. Look at Dwight Yorke for gods sake, a very good player at Villa, goes to the mancs and bangs 30 goals in.

Systems and tactics matter a great deal. Look at Sutton at Blackburn, 20 goals, a league winner, look at him at Chelsea, 1 goal in 20.

Don't sit there and say systems and tactics mean nothing. You don't even watch Fowler, why have an opinion on something you know nothing about?

You're a grade "A" arsewhole lad. You don't have clue and your arguement is a joke.

Stu, EVERYONE agrees Fowler isn't the player he once was, all except you.  A couple of mates of mine saw him and McManaman in Colchester, Essex getting hammered in a club, midweek....doesn't that prove how his 'dedication' to fitness and football has deminished.  of course not, it's all down to City and their tactics, thats why Fowler is overweight and 20 league goals in 4 years.  Best not to mention the fact that he only scored 28 goals in his last 4 years at anfield either!  :D



you make me laugh stu, you really do!   :laugh:
“You cannot transfer the heart and soul of Liverpool Football Club, although I am sure there are many clubs who would like to buy it.”
User avatar
7_Kewell
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13669
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: Here, there, everywhere

Postby 115-1073096938 » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:52 pm

7_Kewell wrote:
stu_the_red wrote:
7_Kewell wrote: Stu seems to think its all to do with Man City's system, but the Fowler of old would have been knocking in 30 goals a season in any team, regardless.

I think its all down to City's system?

:laugh:

Putting words in my mouth.

And yes, of course he'd score 30 goals in any team. Systems and tactics mean nothing in football do they. Look at Dwight Yorke for gods sake, a very good player at Villa, goes to the mancs and bangs 30 goals in.

Systems and tactics matter a great deal. Look at Sutton at Blackburn, 20 goals, a league winner, look at him at Chelsea, 1 goal in 20.

Don't sit there and say systems and tactics mean nothing. You don't even watch Fowler, why have an opinion on something you know nothing about?

You're a grade "A" arsewhole lad. You don't have clue and your arguement is a joke.

Stu, EVERYONE agrees Fowler isn't the player he once was, all except you.  A couple of mates of mine saw him and McManaman in Colchester, Essex getting hammered in a club, midweek....doesn't that prove how his 'dedication' to fitness and football has deminished.  of course not, it's all down to City and their tactics, thats why Fowler is overweight and 20 league goals in 4 years.  Best not to mention the fact that he only scored 28 goals in his last 4 years at anfield either!  :D



you make me laugh stu, you really do!   :laugh:

How old are you? I ask because you show a lack of intelligence and a lack basic human ability to grasp what i'm saying. I don't care in the slightest for other people's opinions. I say what i see. Other people will never, ever, ever, ever, strongly influence my judgement of players in the way it does to you. I am perfectly capable myself of judging how good a player is and i don't need an idiot to tell me otherwise.

Secondly, if you read through the thread, which so far on these last three pages you have failed to do as all you do is repeat a stupid and pathetic attempt at an arguement, you would see i've acknowledged he's 80% of the player he once was. He's not the same, he's not as good, i also acknowledged he's lost fitness aswell. Read through the post again child and have a look.

A couple of mates of yours saw him getting drunk? Really? Is that so? I saw Xabi Alonso and John Arne Riise :censored: three weeks ago with Luis Garcia who was stone cold sober in the panamerican club on the albert dock, whats your point? Just because someone goes out and gets bladdered doesn't mean they can't be fit. I have a friend who runs marathons, yet he's out with us every sunday.

The most amusing thing is about your arguement, not only is it completely immature, it has no foundation. It isn't backed up with facts, or knowledge by watching him play, you've admitted you last saw him once last season, probably on highlights and you state how he can't be any good because a few average managers say so. You then try to twist it and laugh it off because you simply can't come up with a decent arguement. You haven't once debated any point i've made with any credible arguement.

My guess is you're about 19-25 years old, were a failed Sunday league player at best, aren't from Liverpool, very rarely go to watch any live games (Especially at anfield, probably never been) and sit there in the pub claiming Sven's an idiot because he picks Ferdinand over Carragher and Beckham still plays for England.

Come back when you have a good arguement or actually have a clue about the game. I've spend the last three pages making numorous points, you've spent them telling us how...

"He can't be any good because someone else says so".

Says everything lad. Absoloutely everything.
115-1073096938
 

Postby 115-1073096938 » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:54 pm

Ola Mr Benitez wrote:
Ace Ventura wrote:He was leathered but thats what he was saying.

And that my friends is one of Robbies problems..  A player in his 30's shouldn't be gettingleathered as they need to work twice as hard as everyone else to keep up with the frightening pace of the premieship..

Didi Hamann's smoked 20 a day for the last 10 years, whats your point? Vialli, I'll reapeat that, Gianluca Vialli, i don't know if you're old enough to remember him admitted smoking 40 a day throughout most of his career.
115-1073096938
 

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 113 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e