LFC2007 wrote:made in UK wrote:It's early but feck it, I'm seriously p!ssed off.
You can't be, you like playing devils advocate too much.
Feck off.

LFC2007 wrote:made in UK wrote:It's early but feck it, I'm seriously p!ssed off.
You can't be, you like playing devils advocate too much.
Feck off.
THEBARON wrote:It has to be said that he has not impressed me very much since he started playing - but to be fair he is playing in a struggling team at the moment.
The players around him are lacking confidence and that is bound to have an effect.
But maybe we should expect more for £ 20 million ...........
Sir Roger wrote:And that will come with time
He has had to hit the ground running with his shoelaces tied together.
We shouldnt expect too mush is what Im saying
LFC2007 wrote:Sir Roger wrote:And that will come with time
He has had to hit the ground running with his shoelaces tied together.
We shouldnt expect too mush is what Im saying
He was/is supposed to be a big part of the 'turner the corner' equation, that's probably why I was expecting more, earlier. Especially against Wolves/Reading.
I wouldn't deem him a failure because I'd probably have to see him in 20+ league games before I could make any firm conclusions (though there are players sh!t enough to warrant much earlier calls, as we know). Surely you have to ask questions though.
LFC2007 wrote:Sir Roger wrote:And that will come with time
He has had to hit the ground running with his shoelaces tied together.
We shouldnt expect too mush is what Im saying
He was/is supposed to be a big part of the 'turner the corner' equation, that's probably why I was expecting more, earlier. Especially against Wolves/Reading.
I wouldn't deem him a failure because I'd probably have to see him in 20+ league games before I could make any firm conclusions (though there are players sh!t enough to warrant much earlier calls, as we know). Surely you have to ask questions though.
made in UK wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Sir Roger wrote:And that will come with time
He has had to hit the ground running with his shoelaces tied together.
We shouldnt expect too mush is what Im saying
He was/is supposed to be a big part of the 'turner the corner' equation, that's probably why I was expecting more, earlier. Especially against Wolves/Reading.
I wouldn't deem him a failure because I'd probably have to see him in 20+ league games before I could make any firm conclusions (though there are players sh!t enough to warrant much earlier calls, as we know). Surely you have to ask questions though.
Questions were asked long ago before you were able to get your head around things and people were abused for raising their questions.
Bad Bob wrote:made in UK wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Sir Roger wrote:And that will come with time
He has had to hit the ground running with his shoelaces tied together.
We shouldnt expect too mush is what Im saying
He was/is supposed to be a big part of the 'turner the corner' equation, that's probably why I was expecting more, earlier. Especially against Wolves/Reading.
I wouldn't deem him a failure because I'd probably have to see him in 20+ league games before I could make any firm conclusions (though there are players sh!t enough to warrant much earlier calls, as we know). Surely you have to ask questions though.
Questions were asked long ago before you were able to get your head around things and people were abused for raising their questions.
Let's not be going down this road fellas. Old flame wars do not need rekindling no matter how frustrated we're all feeling.
Sir Roger wrote:I would ask the question about why he was put against two championship sides knowing how lesser teams play when he is clearly a ball player and a creative player and not a crunching ball winning give as good as you get player?
made in UK wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Sir Roger wrote:And that will come with time
He has had to hit the ground running with his shoelaces tied together.
We shouldnt expect too mush is what Im saying
He was/is supposed to be a big part of the 'turner the corner' equation, that's probably why I was expecting more, earlier. Especially against Wolves/Reading.
I wouldn't deem him a failure because I'd probably have to see him in 20+ league games before I could make any firm conclusions (though there are players sh!t enough to warrant much earlier calls, as we know). Surely you have to ask questions though.
Questions were asked long ago before you were able to get your head around things during your time as 'devils advocate' and people were abused for raising their questions.
LFC2007 wrote:made in UK wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Sir Roger wrote:And that will come with time
He has had to hit the ground running with his shoelaces tied together.
We shouldnt expect too mush is what Im saying
He was/is supposed to be a big part of the 'turner the corner' equation, that's probably why I was expecting more, earlier. Especially against Wolves/Reading.
I wouldn't deem him a failure because I'd probably have to see him in 20+ league games before I could make any firm conclusions (though there are players sh!t enough to warrant much earlier calls, as we know). Surely you have to ask questions though.
Questions were asked long ago before you were able to get your head around things during your time as 'devils advocate' and people were abused for raising their questions.
LFC2007 wrote:Sir Roger wrote:I would ask the question about why he was put against two championship sides knowing how lesser teams play when he is clearly a ball player and a creative player and not a crunching ball winning give as good as you get player?
He has to acquaint himself with the English game at some point. What better game(s) than Reading, a team we should well be expected to beat? He got more time and space tonight than he'll get against most Prem oposition.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 62 guests