by Sabre » Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:35 pm
I consider myself a scientific, and I'm religious. Scientifics are scientifics of their own branch, and I have only high school level of biology. But yes, I don't think that the woman was taken out of a rib. The religious interpretation of that, for instance, is that woman and man are made of the same thing, which believe it or not, wasn't taken granted for a lot of centuries.
No matter what's your scientific branch, the more you know the more humble you are about what are the limits of science. For anyone that studies the artificial inteligence branch of computer science for instance, knows to admire the brain of a monkey -- let alone a human. You learn to admire it because there's another branch of computer science that studies what can be computed and what cannot (it's about maths). Basically the new computers that appear, know to compute faster than the previous ones, but a problem that isn't solved computationally by current computers, won't be solved by future computers with the current theory (a theory that was developed before we had the technology to make computers, it's pretty old already).
And a monkey's brain does stuff that we wouldn't know how to program. That doesn't prove the idea of God, but it certainly gives you some "humbleness" as a scientific, as nature reaches with evolution a device (the brain) that is much better than your best computer when it comes to intelligence
I guess a physicist is also astonished by nature, or a chemist, or a geologist. So I think there's room for religion for any scientific guy, and I'm pretty sure that there are millions of scientific guys that are religious.
SOS member #1499
Drummerphil, never forgotten.