Liverpool FC Forum

Liverpool Football Club Discussion

Skip to content



Crouchie?

Liverpool Football Club - The Rumour Mill
Post a reply

Postby Dundalk » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:01 pm

Ive heard its a done deal - he is coming back
User avatar
Dundalk
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 14767
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Dundalk
Top

Postby roberto green » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:09 pm

Dundalk wrote:Ive heard its a done deal - he is coming back

From who Dun?
Image
User avatar
roberto green
 
Posts: 3849
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:47 pm
Location: bootle
Top

Postby tubby » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:14 pm

That better be a joke Dundalk
My new blog for my upcoming holiday.

http://kunstevie.wordpress.com/
User avatar
tubby
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 22442
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:05 pm
Top

Postby bunglemark2 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:35 pm

Dundalk wrote:Ive heard its a done deal - he is coming back

You takin' the pi$$ ?
http://s2.tinypic.com/30ldif7_th.jpg
See yooo, Judas. Yoo're gettin' on mah titz !
User avatar
bunglemark2
 
Posts: 7034
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:05 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Top

Postby puroresu » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:51 pm

I really hope not.  29 and we dont need him.  Lets go and get a younger hungry striker who will improve.
User avatar
puroresu
 
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:30 am
Top

Postby boodiddy1 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:50 pm

At 5m yes as a back up. But 10m? They're having a laugh with this one.

I'd rather have forlan for 10m than crouch. I dont want him either. lets get Guiza, Huntelaar or Pavluychenko as understudy. We can get the big name in january with our new found money:D
Image
User avatar
boodiddy1
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: bolton
Top

Postby SouthCoastShankly » Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:59 pm

bunglemark2 wrote:FFS, he left 'cos he wouldn't sit on the bench and play second fiddle to Torres. Unless Hodgson is going to buck the trend followed by EVERY international setup and play 4-4-2 instead of another formation, there is NO place on the team for Crouch. Ergo, he won't come back...

No he didn't, Benitez sold him to fund the Keane transfer. We all know how that turned out.

I would welcome him back, there was no real footballing reason to sell him.
User avatar
SouthCoastShankly
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6076
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: West Sussex
Top

Postby bunglemark2 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:03 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:
bunglemark2 wrote:FFS, he left 'cos he wouldn't sit on the bench and play second fiddle to Torres. Unless Hodgson is going to buck the trend followed by EVERY international setup and play 4-4-2 instead of another formation, there is NO place on the team for Crouch. Ergo, he won't come back...

No he didn't, Benitez sold him to fund the Keane transfer. We all know how that turned out.

I would welcome him back, there was no real footballing reason to sell him.

Look, you're fully entitled to your opinion.....but you're wrong !  :D

He didn't want to deputise for Torres. ~I'll find the quote and post it.....if I can find it....
http://s2.tinypic.com/30ldif7_th.jpg
See yooo, Judas. Yoo're gettin' on mah titz !
User avatar
bunglemark2
 
Posts: 7034
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:05 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Top

Postby In and Out » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:03 pm

Dundalk wrote:Yeah I'd have him back, a good player to have in the squad and is always good for a goal

Agreed.
Football is a relatively simple game and Roy knows it ;)
User avatar
In and Out
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 839
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Ireland
Top

Postby In and Out » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:06 pm

bunglemark2 wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:
bunglemark2 wrote:FFS, he left 'cos he wouldn't sit on the bench and play second fiddle to Torres. Unless Hodgson is going to buck the trend followed by EVERY international setup and play 4-4-2 instead of another formation, there is NO place on the team for Crouch. Ergo, he won't come back...

No he didn't, Benitez sold him to fund the Keane transfer. We all know how that turned out.

I would welcome him back, there was no real footballing reason to sell him.

Look, you're fully entitled to your opinion.....but you're wrong !  :D

He didn't want to deputise for Torres. ~I'll find the quote and post it.....if I can find it....

He probably became disillusioned under Benitez if anything, one week he'd scored a brace and for the next two he'd be sitting on the bench p[robably thinking 'what have I done wrong'.
Football is a relatively simple game and Roy knows it ;)
User avatar
In and Out
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 839
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Ireland
Top

Postby Tim LFC » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:14 pm

Interestingly would you guys rather have Crouch or Remy? That's what Redknapp is doing by selling Crouch, freeing up space for Remy.
User avatar
Tim LFC
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 2:19 pm
Location: Uk
Top

Postby neil » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:17 pm

Yeah I wouldn't mind Crouch back, he's always been effective one way or another and knows how to finish, we would have to ensure carra doesn't hoof the ball up the pitch to him every 5 mins though like last time.
User avatar
neil
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:24 am
Top

Postby In and Out » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:21 pm

neil wrote:Yeah I wouldn't mind Crouch back, he's always been effective one way or another and knows how to finish, we would have to ensure carra doesn't hoof the ball up the pitch to him every 5 mins though like last time.

Tie Carra's boot lases together.
Football is a relatively simple game and Roy knows it ;)
User avatar
In and Out
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 839
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:49 pm
Location: Ireland
Top

Postby SouthCoastShankly » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:37 am

bunglemark2 wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:
bunglemark2 wrote:FFS, he left 'cos he wouldn't sit on the bench and play second fiddle to Torres. Unless Hodgson is going to buck the trend followed by EVERY international setup and play 4-4-2 instead of another formation, there is NO place on the team for Crouch. Ergo, he won't come back...

No he didn't, Benitez sold him to fund the Keane transfer. We all know how that turned out.

I would welcome him back, there was no real footballing reason to sell him.

Look, you're fully entitled to your opinion.....but you're wrong !  :D

He didn't want to deputise for Torres. ~I'll find the quote and post it.....if I can find it....

There's a big difference to agreeing to a move instigated by Benitez, because in the long run you can see more playing chances, to actually handing in a transfer request.

Crouch was a victim of Benitez transfer and squad rotation policy. I sure he never handed in a transfer request.
User avatar
SouthCoastShankly
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6076
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: West Sussex
Top

Postby bigmick » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:59 am

If we do buy Crouch back, please lets not play him on the left wing. That was a resounding failure the last time we gave it a go.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.
Top
PreviousNext
Post a reply

Return to The Rumour Mill

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.

Board index