RAHEEM STERLING - Official Thread

The Premiership - General Discussion

Postby The Good Yank » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:01 pm

The Hustler » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:37 pm wrote:He is still young enough to play for the u18's.

Too much, too soon.

Clearly.  But with Jamaica pushing for Raheem to join their senior team it's forcing England into a situation of play him, just for a couple of minutes even, to tie him to England.
s@int - 13 December 2009

I won't celebrate Rafa going........ but I will be over the moon if Dalglish comes in. League within 2 years if he gets the job, AND YOU CAN QUOTE ME ON THAT.
Image
User avatar
The Good Yank
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: North Brunswick, New Jersey

Postby Roger Red Hat » Tue Sep 11, 2012 11:26 pm

that theory has just been blown away, he never even got on the pitch.
Sex, drugs and sausage rolls!
User avatar
Roger Red Hat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7669
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Yorkshire

Postby The Hustler » Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:33 pm

The lad is too young to be starting every match and for 90 mins. He will burn out.

That smells of desperation by the manager to me.
The Hustler
LFC Advanced Member
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:05 pm
Location: Electric Ladyland

Postby stmichael » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:15 pm

The Hustler » Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:33 pm wrote:The lad is too young to be starting every match and for 90 mins. He will burn out.

That smells of desperation by the manager to me.


why does age matter when you're as good as he is?

i agree that it's a bit of a worry that we're so reliant on him already but what can we do? without him we'd have created bugger all today.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby tubby » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:17 pm

If we had better options then he probably wouldn't be playing so much ... but we don't so we need as much as we can get.

On a side note anyone know when his contract is due?
My new blog for my upcoming holiday.

http://kunstevie.wordpress.com/
User avatar
tubby
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 22442
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:05 pm

Postby The Hustler » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:24 pm

stmichael » Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:15 pm wrote:
The Hustler » Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:33 pm wrote:The lad is too young to be starting every match and for 90 mins. He will burn out.

That smells of desperation by the manager to me.


why does age matter when you're as good as he is?

i agree that it's a bit of a worry that we're so reliant on him already but what can we do? without him we'd have created bugger all today.


I know! What does that tell you about the standard of the whole team! I just don't want all the pressure to be on this young lad.

When he's 20/21, and filled out physically. I'm sure he will be the new John Barnes!
The Hustler
LFC Advanced Member
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:05 pm
Location: Electric Ladyland

Postby stmichael » Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:42 pm

LFC Transfer Update ‏@TransferUpdate
Raheem Sterling is close to agreeing a new 5 year contract at LFC worth £20,000 a week.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby The Good Yank » Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:57 pm

stmichael » Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:42 am wrote:LFC Transfer Update ‏@TransferUpdate
Raheem Sterling is close to agreeing a new 5 year contract at LFC worth £20,000 a week.

I know this may be coming from the opposite end of our thinking, but his agent should be shot.  20 per week for our best player?  Joe Cole should have a word with Raheem.

I was reading the match thread from the Sunderland game and had an absolute mad idea.  Would we be better off having Sterling coming on late in a game as a sub?  Thus reducing the chance of injury of such a young and growing (physically and mentally) player?
s@int - 13 December 2009

I won't celebrate Rafa going........ but I will be over the moon if Dalglish comes in. League within 2 years if he gets the job, AND YOU CAN QUOTE ME ON THAT.
Image
User avatar
The Good Yank
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: North Brunswick, New Jersey

Postby The Hustler » Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:30 pm

Id leave him out of the Europa game on Thursday + save him for the weekend.
The Hustler
LFC Advanced Member
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:05 pm
Location: Electric Ladyland

Postby lakes10 » Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:32 pm

The Good Yank » Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:57 pm wrote:
stmichael » Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:42 am wrote:LFC Transfer Update ‏@TransferUpdate
Raheem Sterling is close to agreeing a new 5 year contract at LFC worth £20,000 a week.

I know this may be coming from the opposite end of our thinking, but his agent should be shot.  20 per week for our best player?  Joe Cole should have a word with Raheem.

I was reading the match thread from the Sunderland game and had an absolute mad idea.  Would we be better off having Sterling coming on late in a game as a sub?  Thus reducing the chance of injury of such a young and growing (physically and mentally) player?


shocked by that, what now to stop another club saying that they would pay him 100k a week.
he is worth a hell of a lot more than 20k a week.
Image
User avatar
lakes10
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12993
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: Essex, England

Postby lakes10 » Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:33 pm

The Hustler » Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:30 pm wrote:Id leave him out of the Europa game on Thursday + save him for the weekend.

yes we are going to need him.
Image
User avatar
lakes10
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12993
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: Essex, England

Postby metalhead » Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:35 pm

I'm scared we might burn him out! give him a break on thursday.

He's been excellent so far
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17474
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Kenny Kan » Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:39 pm

metalhead » Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:35 pm wrote:I'm scared we might burn him out! give him a break on thursday.

He's been excellent so far


Good to see you're still around MH, was starting to worry about you.  :)
Champions of England 2020.

YNWA
User avatar
Kenny Kan
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 4140
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:28 am
Location: Footballing heaven

Postby Benny The Noon » Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:55 pm

lakes10 » Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:32 pm wrote:
The Good Yank » Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:57 pm wrote:
stmichael » Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:42 am wrote:LFC Transfer Update ‏@TransferUpdate
Raheem Sterling is close to agreeing a new 5 year contract at LFC worth £20,000 a week.

I know this may be coming from the opposite end of our thinking, but his agent should be shot.  20 per week for our best player?  Joe Cole should have a word with Raheem.

I was reading the match thread from the Sunderland game and had an absolute mad idea.  Would we be better off having Sterling coming on late in a game as a sub?  Thus reducing the chance of injury of such a young and growing (physically and mentally) player?


shocked by that, what now to stop another club saying that they would pay him 100k a week.
he is worth a hell of a lot more than 20k a week.


He is a 17 year old kid who has played 4 prem games. No one will pay him 100 grand a week. £20 grand is a fair wage for him
Benny The Noon
 

Postby ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:15 pm

rodgers has spoken in the local paper recently about how important it is that young players dont get too much money too soon, he says it takes the edge off their game and they lose that `eye of the tiger` that all young sportsmen, never mind just footballers, should naturally have.
rodgers said until they are mature enough to cope with earning huge sums they shouldnt get the massive wages.
he reckons its a psychological thing.
he`s spoke to raheem about it and sterling says it makes sense what rodgers is saying, thats why rodgers keeps on praising raheems attitude, sterling is not panicking and trying to grab the money while he can, he`s taking a long term view of his career and realises earning £100,000 a week at 17 might interfere with his career development. raheem`s priority at the moment is to be a great footballer not a millionaire.
ycsatbjywtbiastkamb
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 12270
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:54 pm
Location: Liverpool

PreviousNext

Return to Premiership - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests