alwayslfc » Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:24 pm wrote:Andy may be getting his act together but I don't think he will fit well into B.R. tiki taka football where there's no lofting of high balls in the air for Andy who is basically an aerial man. Thus I don't expect him to be here for long, maybe will be sold next January. I'm sure he'll still be here for at least another season had Kenny been given one more season.
maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:09 am wrote:And therein lies the problem. In order for Andy to be effective for us, we need an excellent crosser and we need to play in a certain way.
=
one dimensional
maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:09 am wrote:And therein lies the problem. In order for Andy to be effective for us, we need an excellent crosser and we need to play in a certain way.
=
one dimensional
maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:09 am wrote:And therein lies the problem. In order for Andy to be effective for us, we need an excellent crosser and we need to play in a certain way.
=
one dimensional
Benny The Noon » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:15 am wrote:maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:09 am wrote:And therein lies the problem. In order for Andy to be effective for us, we need an excellent crosser and we need to play in a certain way.
=
one dimensional
Constantly saying the same thing over and over again doesn't make it right.
kazza » Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:58 am wrote:maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:09 am wrote:And therein lies the problem. In order for Andy to be effective for us, we need an excellent crosser and we need to play in a certain way.
=
one dimensional
I would say that NOT having an big strong player that is good in the air is one dimensional. The more options the better.
maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:25 pm wrote:kazza » Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:58 am wrote:maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:09 am wrote:And therein lies the problem. In order for Andy to be effective for us, we need an excellent crosser and we need to play in a certain way.
=
one dimensional
I would say that NOT having an big strong player that is good in the air is one dimensional. The more options the better.
The truth is, having a one dimensional striker is one dimensional. Look at Torres, his best attributes are pace and finishing yet, he can also head the ball in. Look at Owen his best attributes are positioning, pace and finishing, not one dimensional, he can score with right left and with his head. Look at fowler, he can score from anywhere, he doesn't need acres of space, he doesn't need minutes to pull the trigger, he doesn't need a pin point accurate cross. Andy is one dimensional PERIOD. And so were Crouch and Heskey. They don't meet the mark of a main striker that we so desperately need.
maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:55 pm wrote:Let's just wait and see how many goals he'll score next season shall we ? The way some of you make him out to be, it's almost as if he's Alan Shearer
supersub » Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:07 pm wrote:maguskwt » Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:55 pm wrote:Let's just wait and see how many goals he'll score next season shall we ? The way some of you make him out to be, it's almost as if he's Alan Shearer
How many goals scored in the league , would be acceptable by your standards, for Andy Carroll ?
Return to Premiership - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests