Liverpool FC Forum

by **kazza** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:04 am

GYBS wrote:

Is this a better pic for your fragile mind

PMSL It is as if mick write so much that he does not have time to read his own posts. Funniest of all is mick portraying himself as the martyr. I tell you mick you really take yourself too seriously.

(cue the "deary me" "Ahh Kazza", the "oh my" or the much used "you are strange" just to discredit)

by **bigmick** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:07 am

Now there's a surprising post.

by **Sabre** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:08 am

Now this is cruelty to animals.

by **kazza** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:11 am

bigmick wrote: Now there's a surprising post.

That's ok because I felt sorry for you all by your lonesome. I thought that if I put my input in your posse will come calling :laugh:

You should be thanking me

by **DrPepe** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:12 am

Sabre wrote:

Now this is cruelty to animals.

do i want to know where the other horn is hidden? :oh:

by **kazza** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:14 am

DrPepe wrote:
Sabre wrote:

Now this is cruelty to animals.

do i want to know where the other horn is hidden?

Just look at the grimace, that should tell you

by **kazza** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:33 pm

kazza wrote:
bigmick wrote::) Now there's a surprising post.

That's ok because I felt sorry for you all by your lonesome. I thought that if I put my input in your posse will come calling

You should be thanking me

Ahh that's the thing about a posse, fickle by nature!

by **bigmick** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:36 pm

kazza wrote:
kazza wrote:
bigmick wrote::) Now there's a surprising post.

That's ok because I felt sorry for you all by your lonesome. I thought that if I put my input in your posse will come calling

You should be thanking me

Ahh that's the thing about a posse, fickle by nature!

I did enjoy your post about the grimace anyway, quite good that. Anyways.

by **kazza** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:43 pm

bigmick wrote:
kazza wrote:
kazza wrote:
bigmick wrote::) Now there's a surprising post.

That's ok because I felt sorry for you all by your lonesome. I thought that if I put my input in your posse will come calling

You should be thanking me

Ahh that's the thing about a posse, fickle by nature!

I did enjoy your post about the grimace anyway, quite good that. Anyways.

Surprising what you can do with ONE LINE

by **maguskwt** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:10 pm

so what was this thread about?

by **GYBS** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:15 pm

Wether or not Girl C is fat or not mate

by **heimdall** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:47 pm

maguskwt wrote:so what was this thread about?

Who cares, lets form an angry mob and attack someone.

by **Owzat** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 am

stmichael wrote:Gerrard may not be at 100% but even at 50% he is a million times better than a few other players we have who are not pulling their weight. Gerrard has done so much for this club he deserves to be cut some slack when he has a bad patch. This is in contrast to a few others who seem to be escaping flack/public criticism despite doing sweet FA for us, who either need a rocket up their backside or even to be shipped out.

So are you saying it's ok for Gerrard to underperform or not give 100% (and Torres) but everyone else can get stick? :Oo:

Every time we play poorly, the scapegoats are normally the ones who get criticised, even though people would put Lucas, Babel, Voronin etc in a different class bracket to Reina, Carra, Gerrard, Kuyt, Mascherano and Torres. If the team plays badly it is becasue of the weaker players, even though they are outnumbered by the supposed superior quality players and they didn't do much better.

Or put another way, teams that win the title will invariably have some weak(er) players in it, but the quality/key players rise to the occaision more often than our's do. When the mancs lose, or looked like losing last season, it was because they left out key players or the key players didn't play well. They still had a weak RB, Fletcher, Nani or Anderson aren't key players and their keeper was susceptable, but the key is their key players not whether Fabio or Nani or Fletcher had a stinker. We seem to focus heavily on how Lucas, Babel or Voronin play when they are peripheral to the team performance. We didn't lose to villa because Lucas headed into his own net, we lost because the TEAM didn't play well and how many had good games or better?

Or are we aiming at a "perfect team"? If we got rid of Babel, Kuyt, Voronin, Dossena and Lucas, and brought in the very best replacements, who would we then blame? I'm guessing not Gerrard, not until the team has better players all around him and then, maybe then, he will become Lucas-fied (very much open to criticism, being called "sh it" etc)

by **DrPepe** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:38 am

Ooo controversial

But some good points, Owzat.

I totally agree that teams will always rely on their best players hitting the mark - missed chances by torres, Gerard , benyoun whilst we were on top in the first 20 of the villa game arguably cost us as much as anything else that went wrong that night

by **maguskwt** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:32 pm

GYBS wrote:Wether or not Girl C is fat or not mate

kinda chubby for me yes... :nod

Liverpool FC Forum

Forget parry... - Rafa singles out gerrard for mention.

Who is online