Liverpool FC Forum

bigmick wrote:Oh so the three of you are hunting in a little pack now, how cozy for you. Trying to make yourselves look all big and clever and stuff like that. Anyone who makes any comment about Rafa gets leaped upon by a pack of hungry dogs, with bovver boots on, salivating at the prospect of their latest meal. And Doc, how do you know Rafa set the team up to beat Newcastle 5-1? How do you know Sami didn't pick the team? (that's Lee not Hyppia). How do you know Rafa doesn't let the players take it in turns to have a go, it could have been Lee Peltiers go this time., where you there at the team meeting?

It amazes me that people are prepared to believe rumours in the press about who picks the team, speck-you-lay-shun is all it is and some people just go ahead and believe it.

Then you cap it off with a picture of some disgusting cruelty to an animal. Just because he uses a red cloak it's not Ok, Ok.

Lando_Griffin wrote:

bigmick wrote:Oh so the three of you are hunting in a little pack now, how cozy for you. Trying to make yourselves look all big and clever and stuff like that. Anyone who makes any comment about Rafa gets leaped upon by a pack of hungry dogs, with bovver boots on, salivating at the prospect of their latest meal. And Doc, how do you know Rafa set the team up to beat Newcastle 5-1? How do you know Sami didn't pick the team? (that's Lee not Hyppia). How do you know Rafa doesn't let the players take it in turns to have a go, it could have been Lee Peltiers go this time., where you there at the team meeting?

It amazes me that people are prepared to believe rumours in the press about who picks the team, speck-you-lay-shun is all it is and some people just go ahead and believe it.

Then you cap it off with a picture of some disgusting cruelty to an animal. Just because he uses a red cloak it's not Ok, Ok.

Diddums.

Of course, it was perfectly acceptable for you, Saint, Ace, The Rock, Bam and penis to go a hunting together, wasn't it, dear boy?

Sorry I didn't think it needed a sarcasm smiley as I thought it was fairly clear I was just kidding. It was meant to be kind of ironic, "in the style of" so to speak.

For instance when I asked how did they know that Lee Peltier hadn't picked the team, I didn't really mean it, like literally you know. Equally, dogs don't wear "bovver boots" actually, and the use of the word "leapt" was a reference to another post a couple of days ago.

Anyway never mind, it isn't important.   As for "going hunting together" I've never done that. Often infact I've been "hunted" alone. I can remember quite a few occasions where I've been pretty much on my own with my opinions over the years. I don't mind that, it's only knockabout football banter at the end of the day, and over time often people swing round to an opposing viewpoint in any case.

Sorry you missed this one though, I must do better to make it more obvious next time, although as I'm sure you'd be the first to tell me Lando, perhaps humour isn't my strong point  .

s@int wrote:I think we now need an "in the style of" smilie Mick  Not that you need worry too much.......I can't see anybody writing 3 pages just to imitate your style

Feck off S@int Mind you you're right, nobody is going to write three pages of b0ll0cks just to copy me. Strangely enough I just started a topic and got into it a bit, and feck me it's a novel. Usually if the topic starter is too long it never gets going because people can't be bothered to read it, not that I can blame em I must say .

I was surprised Lando didn't get me though, I thought it was pretty clear to be honest  .