Liverpool FC Forum

by **dawson99** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:27 pm

All im saying is the world would be a lot better without gangs who rape kill and stuff... my bad, i'll stay out of it.
we do afghanistan.. then on the way back pop to Africa, take out that Mugabe fella and anyone else who is commiting genocide

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:31 pm

Number 9 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Number 9 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:When the Taliban arrived in the village 10 months ago and drove the police out, local people rejoiced, said Mohammad Rasul, a toothless elderly farmer who keeps a few cows and chickens in a neatly tended orchard of pomegranate trees, figs and grape vines.

Although his own son was killed by a Taliban roadside bomb five years ago, Rasul said the fighters earned their welcome in the village by treating people with respect.

"We were happy (after the Taliban arrived). The Taliban never bothered us," he said.

full article

And you are studying law........?

what do you know about education?

Enough to ignore a silly little boy with a huge chip on his shoulder and something to prove!
Talk about the topic lad..we all know you have a great education..lets hear you put it into practice??

What are your views on the topic and questions posted?
Try talking about it without putting fairy lights all over yourself and seeking attention!

i hear you fix leaks by profession. how about fixing your mouth?

my views? first of all, i can't understand why is it that the UK pledged so much money for the redevelopment of Iraq yet they arent forking out the same amount for issues within their own walls.

secondly, Tony Blair used his power as PM at that time to send troops to Iraq without consulting other ministers. This was one of the reasons why the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 was formed wasn't it? furthermore, some families had this impression that their sons were being sent only for a peacekeeping mission, not war.

Since Labour came to power, the British government has often expressed its desire to be 'at the heart of Europe'. Supporting US policy has allowed the UK to halt the French and Germans from pushing through the Common European Foreign Policy. Britain cannot hope to develop its political clout in the EU unless it is able to align itself in opposition to this Franco-German alliance. so it's all political surprise surprise.

thirdly, Cool Hand Luke does mention some very good points especially about how the media focuses everything in the Middle East while ignoring the situation in Africa. why? is it because there is no natural resources that is of importance there compared to Middle East?

and finally, how many more innocent ones are gonna die before the objective is reached? i am convinced, based on their track record that the USA has ulterior motives and hidden agendas. depending on which perspective you take, the glass is either half full or half empty. personally, i feel the general idea of going to war "for the benefits of human rights and to prevent further violation" is a very noble one. but how true is that?

by **Number 9** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:33 pm

dawson99 wrote:All im saying is the world would be a lot better without gangs who rape kill and stuff... my bad, i'll stay out of it.
we do afghanistan.. then on the way back pop to Africa, take out that Mugabe fella and anyone else who is commiting genocide

Like in Gears of war..lol its not that simple if it was we could just send in John Rambo!

by **Cool Hand Luke** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:36 pm

Fear not........

by **Number 9** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:50 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Number 9 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Number 9 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:When the Taliban arrived in the village 10 months ago and drove the police out, local people rejoiced, said Mohammad Rasul, a toothless elderly farmer who keeps a few cows and chickens in a neatly tended orchard of pomegranate trees, figs and grape vines.

Although his own son was killed by a Taliban roadside bomb five years ago, Rasul said the fighters earned their welcome in the village by treating people with respect.

"We were happy (after the Taliban arrived). The Taliban never bothered us," he said.

full article

And you are studying law........?

what do you know about education?

Enough to ignore a silly little boy with a huge chip on his shoulder and something to prove!
Talk about the topic lad..we all know you have a great education..lets hear you put it into practice??

What are your views on the topic and questions posted?
Try talking about it without putting fairy lights all over yourself and seeking attention!

i hear you fix leaks by profession. how about fixing your mouth?

my views? first of all, i can't understand why is it that the UK pledged so much money for the redevelopment of Iraq yet they arent forking out the same amount for issues within their own walls.

secondly, Tony Blair used his power as PM at that time to send troops to Iraq without consulting other ministers. This was one of the reasons why the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 was formed wasn't it? furthermore, some families had this impression that their sons were being sent only for a peacekeeping mission, not war.

Since Labour came to power, the British government has often expressed its desire to be 'at the heart of Europe'. Supporting US policy has allowed the UK to halt the French and Germans from pushing through the Common European Foreign Policy. Britain cannot hope to develop its political clout in the EU unless it is able to align itself in opposition to this Franco-German alliance. so it's all political surprise surprise.

thirdly, Cool Hand Luke does mention some very good points especially about how the media focuses everything in the Middle East while ignoring the situation in Africa. why? is it because there is no natural resources that is of importance there compared to Middle East?

and finally, how many more innocent ones are gonna die before the objective is reached? i am convinced, based on their track record that the USA has ulterior motives and hidden agendas. depending on which perspective you take, the glass is either half full or half empty. personally, i feel the general idea of going to war "for the benefits of human rights and to prevent further violation" is a very noble one. but how true is that?

You hear the truth lad ..I fix leaks and stop them,yerah Im a plumber!So you go to law school?

You think you can come on here and belittle me because you spent a few months in college in Singapore and are therefore clever??
You are an absolute tool lad..always were always will be...just a little dick ...Uncle Saint will fill u in..give him a shout!

by **GYBS** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:12 pm

Not once did we go to Iraq on any peacekeeping mission - there was no peace to keep . We were going to war simple as that .

by **NANNY RED** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:55 pm

Well im sh.itting myself my nephew is there hes just 21 ffs, hes just been home for 2 weeks an has now gone back, its horrible every time you hear a soldier has been killed you just listen for what company an where it was . Im sorry but in my eyes we cant win against evil ba,stards like that, you kill one an twenty more arrive on the scene, shouldnt :censored:

be there imo, An as Igor said youve only got to look at the Russians, It makes me sick to hear that brown or the defence minister saying , its gonna be hard an more lives will be lost , none of them have got kids out there , Feck the lot of them in my eyes , Id bring the lads home an let them :censored:

kill one another , instead of our young lads getting killed,

by **Emerald Red** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:18 am

It's got sweet f*ck all to do with the Taliban and never has. That's just media propaganda bollox. The backwash of the Bush administration is obviously still in some people's mouths and they'll drag that dead cat through the mud as long as they possibly can, at least until they invent another excuse. The thing is, Afghanistan is important to America and Britain because it's a strategical apex of land. Should the Russians become a threat once more, that peice of land will become extremely important as a foothold to the middle-east and surrounding area.

by **Madmax** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:27 am

TBH i don't think england should have joined forces with USA and gone to war with them. Should have let the americans take care of their own business. If we did not join with america i doubt it 7/7 would have happened. With the US there is always a hidden agenda. We all know reason why they went to iraq was to drain their resources... (oil anyone!)

Its the British soldiers that are suffering from this shithole of a war.. Waste of money which could be put in better usage in this country.

As for the war in afghanistan... 9/11 was blamed on al-qaeedah and reason why afghanistan was bombed was because the taliban were protecting osama. When the hidden agenda is ignored the situation is always changed. Media turn attention to how fecked the country was run etc... If thats the case then what about sudan, zimbabwe and other brutal regimes....
Main purpose or excuse is put as side and when one knows it was a mistake to go in the first place then they bring out other issues..

Question on iraq arrises was it better under saddam or is it better now???
For me is fecking the same and TBH worse now... Suicides bomb almost everyday...

Same could be said about afghanistan... We all know taliban had thier extreme views but i feel their leader should have told osama to feck off.. The situation in pakistan is getting dire now. After what happen in the red mosque in 2007 the situation has deteriorated.
I could see it only getting worse which is what the US want. They want to jump into pakistan start a war and grab their nuclear arsenal. Only power they fear at the moment in the east. India will always be with the US but pakistan is a worry!

US has a complete plan and for them the sad thing is this war will take decades to be over. There initial plan was to hit syria/iran next Its like a monster feasting on others necessities. US wants a stronghold in every country (global power), modern day empire spreading in a disguised form....
Research info on africa and you would realise it was the US that left them in the :censored:

. Africa has tons of resources which the US feeds on.

There are some interesting theories out there which invole the US and trust me research them and you will be shocked. Stuff on the illuminti etc...

Info

by **dawson99** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:29 am

The illuminati are weird!
I read alot about that lot, very cool in that scary kind of way

by **account deleted by request** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:00 am

Number 9 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Number 9 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Number 9 wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:When the Taliban arrived in the village 10 months ago and drove the police out, local people rejoiced, said Mohammad Rasul, a toothless elderly farmer who keeps a few cows and chickens in a neatly tended orchard of pomegranate trees, figs and grape vines.

Although his own son was killed by a Taliban roadside bomb five years ago, Rasul said the fighters earned their welcome in the village by treating people with respect.

"We were happy (after the Taliban arrived). The Taliban never bothered us," he said.

full article

And you are studying law........?

what do you know about education?

Enough to ignore a silly little boy with a huge chip on his shoulder and something to prove!
Talk about the topic lad..we all know you have a great education..lets hear you put it into practice??

What are your views on the topic and questions posted?
Try talking about it without putting fairy lights all over yourself and seeking attention!

i hear you fix leaks by profession. how about fixing your mouth?

my views? first of all, i can't understand why is it that the UK pledged so much money for the redevelopment of Iraq yet they arent forking out the same amount for issues within their own walls.

secondly, Tony Blair used his power as PM at that time to send troops to Iraq without consulting other ministers. This was one of the reasons why the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 was formed wasn't it? furthermore, some families had this impression that their sons were being sent only for a peacekeeping mission, not war.

Since Labour came to power, the British government has often expressed its desire to be 'at the heart of Europe'. Supporting US policy has allowed the UK to halt the French and Germans from pushing through the Common European Foreign Policy. Britain cannot hope to develop its political clout in the EU unless it is able to align itself in opposition to this Franco-German alliance. so it's all political surprise surprise.

thirdly, Cool Hand Luke does mention some very good points especially about how the media focuses everything in the Middle East while ignoring the situation in Africa. why? is it because there is no natural resources that is of importance there compared to Middle East?

and finally, how many more innocent ones are gonna die before the objective is reached? i am convinced, based on their track record that the USA has ulterior motives and hidden agendas. depending on which perspective you take, the glass is either half full or half empty. personally, i feel the general idea of going to war "for the benefits of human rights and to prevent further violation" is a very noble one. but how true is that?

You hear the truth lad ..I fix leaks and stop them,yerah Im a plumber!So you go to law school?

You think you can come on here and belittle me because you spent a few months in college in Singapore and are therefore clever??
You are an absolute tool lad..always were always will be...just a little dick ...Uncle Saint will fill u in..give him a shout!

If as you said you don't want to speak to me, stop mentioning me in your arguments with others Barry.

Nice to see you back Maxi and a good post mate.

by **Big Niall** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:08 am

I was against the Iraq war from the start as I always believed it to be a lie by bush and blair (and I believe I was proved right) however, I support the afghanstan war, pakistan and afgghanastan are camps for terrorists. want to know how to blow up a london station, or hijack a plane into NY, how can anyone, not view this as a threat.

I do not give a f&ck if a muslim country wants to live under their rules, but if they are a threat (whic Iraq never was) to our way of life _ f*ck them, I support britain 100 per cent in this war.

I do have my doubts about how winnable it is though, read your history, britain has bee bogged down here many times.

by **account deleted by request** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:16 am

Big Niall wrote:I was against the Iraq war from the start as I always believed it to be a lie by bush and blair (and I believe I was proved right) however, I support the afghanstan war, pakistan and afgghanastan are camps for terrorists. want to know how to blow up a london station, or hijack a plane into NY, how can anyone, not view this as a threat.

I do not give a f&ck if a muslim country wants to live under their rules, but if they are a threat (whic Iraq never was) to our way of life _ f*ck them, I support britain 100 per cent in this war.

I do have my doubts about how winnable it is though, read your history, britain has bee bogged down here many times.

I agree with most of your post Niall, but I also supported us going into Iraq...... I also thought we should have finished what we started the first time in the first Gulf war. (I believed Blair at the time, but like you I now believe we were lied to)

by **Number 9** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:34 am

Saintbo.......................

25 years of dic,kheadness and a lifetime of denial on benefits leads one man to very twisted things..he is Saintbo!!

(sorry i wont mention you again)!

by **account deleted by request** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:16 am

It doesn't bother me if you mention me or not Barry, but I do reserve the right to show you up as the pathetic little worm that you are every time you do.

Barry complaining about Bob ruining the forum

Don't cry Barry, just run along little man and try to annoy someone else.

Liverpool FC Forum

War in afganistan - What you think!

Who is online