NEW STADIUM - All News + discussion here

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby cpc4eva » Thu May 07, 2009 10:12 am

just read this and am so :censored: off right now......

cant stand the thought of the maure being even bigger

and im venting my anger & disgust as to why LFC didnt / havnt / should have made our stadium whether it be anfield or other so much larger and on the scale of 100,000 seats

now the bloddy mancs will have double capacity than ours doulble the income from ticket sales and if they dont already have the money to purchase whichever player in the world they want they sure will be able to now  :angry:

so disgusted and gutted  :angry: :angry: :angry:


http://www.sportsprodailydeal.com/deals....ium=rss


Manchester United will make Old Trafford bigger than Wembley07 May 2009 | By Adam Fraser | Infrastructure, SoccerManchester United’s Old Trafford stadium will be the biggest in England after 20,000 new seats are added to the 75,000 capacity stadium. The venue will be more than double the size of Anfield, home of United’s great rivals Liverpool, and Chelsea’s Stamford Bridge, both of which hold less than 45,000 fans.

It will also be bigger than Wembley, the 90,000-seat England national stadium, and second only to Barcelona’s Nou Camp in European soccer. United will play Barcelona in this season’s Uefa Champions League final as the club seeks to retain the trophy it won for the third time last season.

United are also overwhleming favourites to win the Premier League title for the third time in a row, and what would be the club’s 11th title since the launch of the Premier League in 1992.

“There is a strategic plan for the stadium,“ admitted George Johnstone, United’s group property manager.
Image
User avatar
cpc4eva
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 7:49 am
Location: Australia

Postby ste123lfc » Thu May 07, 2009 10:54 am

cpc4eva wrote:just read this and am so :censored: off right now......

cant stand the thought of the maure being even bigger

and im venting my anger & disgust as to why LFC didnt / havnt / should have made our stadium whether it be anfield or other so much larger and on the scale of 100,000 seats

now the bloddy mancs will have double capacity than ours doulble the income from ticket sales and if they dont already have the money to purchase whichever player in the world they want they sure will be able to now  :angry:

so disgusted and gutted  :angry: :angry: :angry:


http://www.sportsprodailydeal.com/deals....ium=rss


Manchester United will make Old Trafford bigger than Wembley07 May 2009 | By Adam Fraser | Infrastructure, SoccerManchester United’s Old Trafford stadium will be the biggest in England after 20,000 new seats are added to the 75,000 capacity stadium. The venue will be more than double the size of Anfield, home of United’s great rivals Liverpool, and Chelsea’s Stamford Bridge, both of which hold less than 45,000 fans.

It will also be bigger than Wembley, the 90,000-seat England national stadium, and second only to Barcelona’s Nou Camp in European soccer. United will play Barcelona in this season’s Uefa Champions League final as the club seeks to retain the trophy it won for the third time last season.

United are also overwhleming favourites to win the Premier League title for the third time in a row, and what would be the club’s 11th title since the launch of the Premier League in 1992.

“There is a strategic plan for the stadium,“ admitted George Johnstone, United’s group property manager.

Won't happen mate, there is a railway line right behind the stand in question and this leads to a major freight terminal. Unless they plan to built a tunnel through the middle of the stand, forget it
From Shankly to Brendan we follow our team, Rome to Istanbul we've all lived the dream. Our journey is long, our goal stays the same, to keep for our children the famous red name.
User avatar
ste123lfc
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:53 pm

Postby sworth26 » Thu May 07, 2009 11:32 am

one of the train lines already goes under the stand, I would have thought it would be possible to build over the second line.
User avatar
sworth26
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 11:24 am
Location: Manchester

Postby ste123lfc » Thu May 07, 2009 2:54 pm

sworth26 wrote:one of the train lines already goes under the stand, I would have thought it would be possible to build over the second line.

No it doesn't, there are three lines that run behind the stand and they cannot be moved. I work for Network Rail and walked along them many times, spitting in the general direction of Castle Greyskull. :D
From Shankly to Brendan we follow our team, Rome to Istanbul we've all lived the dream. Our journey is long, our goal stays the same, to keep for our children the famous red name.
User avatar
ste123lfc
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:53 pm

Postby heimdall » Thu May 07, 2009 3:00 pm

ste123lfc wrote:
sworth26 wrote:one of the train lines already goes under the stand, I would have thought it would be possible to build over the second line.

No it doesn't, there are three lines that run behind the stand and they cannot be moved. I work for Network Rail and walked along them many times, spitting in the general direction of Castle Greyskull. :D

Fecking hell you're a brave man admitting you work for Network Rail.  :D
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

Postby ste123lfc » Thu May 07, 2009 3:11 pm

heimdall wrote:
ste123lfc wrote:
sworth26 wrote:one of the train lines already goes under the stand, I would have thought it would be possible to build over the second line.

No it doesn't, there are three lines that run behind the stand and they cannot be moved. I work for Network Rail and walked along them many times, spitting in the general direction of Castle Greyskull. :D

Fecking hell you're a brave man admitting you work for Network Rail.  :D

They reward us handsomely for the embarrassment of it. :D
From Shankly to Brendan we follow our team, Rome to Istanbul we've all lived the dream. Our journey is long, our goal stays the same, to keep for our children the famous red name.
User avatar
ste123lfc
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:53 pm

Postby Madmax » Thu May 07, 2009 3:23 pm

They are mute fans anyway so who gives a shyte if they get thousands more..
User avatar
Madmax
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 5:51 pm
Location: uk

Postby J*o*n*D*o*e » Thu May 07, 2009 7:35 pm

build the fooker as big as you want, more fans for our boys to :censored: all over again.
Image
ImageImage
User avatar
J*o*n*D*o*e
 
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby galaxtico » Thu May 07, 2009 9:14 pm

http://www.stadiumzone.net

has got some new pictures :)
galaxtico
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:31 am

Postby cpc4eva » Fri May 08, 2009 10:16 pm

gets my goat  im so passionate about the club like everyone else who supports LFC and for far far too long the club have been so short sighted and procrastinated and been complete wallys when it comes to increasing the stadium capacity

im gutted that LFC have such a small ground in comparison to clubs such as barcelona nou camp 98,772 capacity, real madrid's bernabeu 80,355 capacity, a.c milan 80,000 capacity, manure's old trafford 76,000 capacity, arsenal's emirates 60,000 capacity......

im not talking about bragging rights as to who has the biggest stadium capacity either -

the whole argument for the larger stadium capacity is about rasing extra revenue to make the club stronger - more ticket sales per game means more revenue for the club translates into a bigger transfer kitty

even if old trafford expansion talk to over 90,000 is :censored: still drives me mad and gets me angry that we havnt started anything on building a larger capacity stadium, its all been talk for years and years and continues to be that way.....

now the funds have dried up with the owners and the initial stadium capacity plans revealed an 80,000 plus stadium which is worthy for our great club.... however same old story when it comes to stadium talk with this club.  Plans have been revised downwards to 60,000 which is hardly befitting our great club and proud history

and still it looks like work will never start on our new stadium

its criminal that LFC dont have one of the largest stadiums in europe

:angry: :angry: :angry:
Image
User avatar
cpc4eva
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 7:49 am
Location: Australia

Postby sworth26 » Fri May 15, 2009 9:06 am

Carlsberg keen on Liverpool stadium naming rights

Liverpool's shirt sponsor Carlsberg is keen on buying the naming rights for the English club's new stadium as the brewer renegotiates its current deal, The Associated Press has learned.

The Danish beer's ties with the Reds stretch back to 1991, making it the Premier League's longest commercial partnership. The current contract, worth seven million pounds ($10.6 million) annually, expires at the end of the 2009-10 season.

In announcing Carlsberg's intentions to the AP on Thursday, head of sponsorship Gareth Roberts indicated his company would be monitoring the club's bid to refinance a loan of around 250 million pounds ($375 million) or potential sale and, more crucially, progress on replacing the crumbling Anfield stadium.

The 60,000-seat venue on the adjacent Stanley ( SXE - news - people ) Park was due to have been ready by 2011, but the global economic downturn forced co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett Jr. to halt building work last year.

Carlsberg, though, is still keen on the new stadium bearing its name.

"That will be part of the discussion I'm sure but there's been no decisions yet," Roberts said.

Roberts found the off-field tensions between Hicks and Gillett distracting, but last month's show of unity, with the Americans sitting together during the 4-4 draw with Arsenal, was an encouraging sign as negotiations between the parties intensify.

"(The financial situation) would have to come into it - we need to understand where they are going with the stadium, what is the next step?" Roberts told the AP of Carlsberg's strategy. "(The ownership situation) is a distraction, the best thing is they seem to have resolved the internal issues and they are going to take the next step. If it's done in the right way and they take the next step then absolutely.


http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/05/14/ap6424990.html


18 months ago I would have been against an proposal to 'brand' the stadium but I think I would accept anything just to get the process moving.. 

If it has to be anyone I would prefer Carlsberg as they have shown commitment to us for 18 years..
User avatar
sworth26
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 11:24 am
Location: Manchester

Postby Reg » Fri May 15, 2009 1:39 pm

A few extra comments on the above:

Carlsberg keen on Liverpool stadium naming rights
May 15, 2009
 

     


MANCHESTER, England (AP) -Liverpool's shirt sponsor Carlsberg wants its name on the Premier League club's new stadium, but the brewing company needs assurances about the team's financial strength before extending its long-standing commercial partnership.

The Danish beer brand's ties with the Reds stretch back to 1991, and the current contract worth seven million pounds ($10.6 million) annually expires at the end of the 2009-10 season.

In announcing Carlsberg's intentions to The Associated Press, head of sponsorship Gareth Roberts indicated his company would be monitoring the club's ability to refinance a loan of around 250 million pounds ($375 million) and, more crucially, progress on replacing the crumbling Anfield stadium.

The new 60,000-seat venue on the adjacent Stanley Park was due to have been ready by 2011, but the global economic downturn forced co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett Jr. to halt building work last year.

Carlsberg, though, is still keen on the new stadium bearing its name.

"That will be part of the discussion I'm sure, but there's been no decisions yet," Roberts said.

Roberts found the off-field tensions between Hicks and Gillett distracting, but last month's show of unity, with the Americans sitting together during the 4-4 draw with Arsenal, was an encouraging sign as negotiations between the parties intensify.

"(The financial situation) would have to come into it - we need to understand where they are going with the stadium, what is the next step?" Roberts told the AP. "(The ownership situation) is a distraction. The best thing is they seem to have resolved the internal issues and they are going to take the next step. If it's done in the right way and they take the next step then absolutely.

"The ownership issue is also about the stadium and the financial setup. The stadium is a big step of their progression in the future and we want to be part of that."

Asked by the AP on Thursday about a possible new deal with Carlsberg, Hicks only replied that "they have been a great partner for many years."

Naming rights have been on the owners' agenda since they bought the club in 2007, with Gillett saying the windfall could subsidize buying one top player every year.

Manager Rafa Benitez has complained about the cost of strengthening his squad.

"The price of the players is unbelievable now," Benitez said in a CNN interview aired Friday. "It's very difficult for me to pay 80 million (pounds), 100 million or 50 million, because if the player leaves, you lose all your money."

In 2004, Arsenal negotiated a 15-year naming rights deal for its new stadium with Dubai-based airline Emirates worth more than 100 million pounds. That included an eight-year shirt sponsorship agreement.

Roberts said Carlsberg has been encouraged by the fact Benitez's team is now a credible Premier League challenger, despite Manchester United being on the verge of defending its title.

"We've started the discussions with them. Since 1991 we've been there, so it's a long-term, very strong partnership and we are keen to continue it," Roberts said. "It does some good things for us in the UK and the performance levels are higher now so there's a bit more demand from people going to the games."

Roberts said Liverpool's strong fan base in Asia is an important factor driving Carlsberg's interest in extending the partnership.

The deal will be more complex than the 1991 terms, with the brewer potentially offering more services to the club as part of the financial package.

"There are certain things that are absolutely necessary for a beer company to go and sell its products in the likes of Asia, and we will make sure that's in the contract," Roberts said. "There may be elements of the contract that we don't need.

"What you had 18 years ago is not necessarily what you need now. We are keen to keep the relationship going on the same level that it is now, but there may be creativeness in the way that structure is pulled together."
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13722
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby NANNY RED » Fri May 15, 2009 6:04 pm

Im sorry but i donot want no big Fecking sign saying Carlsberg Anfield, or what ever. I dont even wanna move,
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

Postby heimdall » Fri May 15, 2009 6:22 pm

NANNY RED wrote:Im sorry but i donot want no big Fecking sign saying Carlsberg Anfield, or what ever. I dont even wanna move,

The Carlsberg Stadium, I like it but then I do have an unhealthy fixation with beer.  :D
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

Postby NANNY RED » Fri May 15, 2009 6:27 pm

heimdall wrote:
NANNY RED wrote:Im sorry but i donot want no big Fecking sign saying Carlsberg Anfield, or what ever. I dont even wanna move,

The Carlsberg Stadium, I like it but then I do have an unhealthy fixation with beer.  :D

:laugh: Hiemdell no Carlsberg signs, maybe little ones dotted around the ground but . oh blo.dy hell i feel sick at the thought of even moving, Anfield is were we belong its our home , its my house, Any way while them two are still  here even a sand castle is not gonna be built
HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
User avatar
NANNY RED
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 73 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e