Liverpool FC Forum

by **NANNY RED** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:51 pm

supersub wrote:Dude Love likes to Grab a Granny down at the Gratton;probably means the Grafton......what do you think JB

Must be an arl fella to have rememberd them nights in the Grafton.

by **Ciggy** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:56 pm

supersub wrote:Dude Love likes to Grab a Granny down at the Gratton;probably means the Grafton......what do you think JB

its not Roberts is it

by **supersub** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:57 pm

by **supersub** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:58 pm

even roberts would know it's Grafton not Gratton

by **andy_g** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:00 pm

my mum used to buy half my clothes from grattan's. and the other half from great universal.

by **account deleted by request** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:11 pm

woof woof ! wrote:I really think I shouldn't waste my time re reading shi'te posted by someone in seach of a nutsack.

Yeah , you had better get back to picking arguments with little kids hadn't you. Big man :laugh:

by **LFC2007** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:18 pm

woof woof ! wrote:I was of the impression that he thought we should use the populace of third world countries as a bank from which we could acquire body parts as and when we need them, "Hunt them down if we have to", the fresher the better, even if that meant he had to "rip the organs out" himself.

Of course , I could be wrong.

I too was under that impression; 'better they be put to some good use....than sparing them because some bleeding heart kunt thinks that a future civilisation may develop from their offspring'.

As for taking comments out of context:

Human life cannot be measured by the level of technological contribution or improvements one is able to make toward future generations, or current generations. Aside from the fundamental point that it goes against basic principles of human rights, it's a totally flawed and unworkable concept. There can be no universal definition as to what constitutes a 'contribution to society', and to imply that those in the Western world have the moral authority to define the term, is utterly ridiculous.

is wrong because Doctors are already making these decisions on a daily basis, although it is worth noting that as far as distribution goes, everyone has to be able to pay in order to receive a transplant - and that is why many poor people never undergo the process. Overall, transplants are a procedure for people with lots of money or lots of insurance. (Or in our case whether you are private or NHS)

Am I disagreeing with that statement?

No, and I'm a firm advocate of universal healthcare.

The comment, in its correct context, addressed this sick argument which tried to justify arbitrary organ harvesting. Who selects those who are to be 'harvested', and on what basis? That was the point I sought to highlight, and dismiss. It had nothing to with the prioritisation of transplant recipients.

by **woof woof !** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:04 pm

s@int wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:I really think I shouldn't waste my time re reading shi'te posted by someone in seach of a nutsack.

Yeah , you had better get back to picking arguments with little kids hadn't you. Big man

Just as soon as you give them permission to take their tounges out of your a'rse I might just do that .

:nod

by **woof woof !** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:13 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:whoever banned him got it wrong big time. he hasnt done anything wrong. he seems friendly and should be allowed back in.

Well apparently Dude Love has some supporters.

So, Dude Love AKA JBG which account do you want deleted ?

by **NANNY RED** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:16 pm

woof woof ! wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:whoever banned him got it wrong big time. he hasnt done anything wrong. he seems friendly and should be allowed back in.

Well apparently Dude Love has some supporters.

So, Dude Love AKA JBG which account do you want deleted ?

hell an after all that :laugh:

by **Bam** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:18 pm

woof woof ! wrote:
s@int wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:I really think I shouldn't waste my time re reading shi'te posted by someone in seach of a nutsack.

Yeah , you had better get back to picking arguments with little kids hadn't you. Big man

Just as soon as you give them permission to take their tounges out of your a'rse I might just do that .

Are you refering to me there Woof, because I often agree with S@int and that I think he's a good bloke ?

Please explain ?

by **woof woof !** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:22 pm

Bam wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:
s@int wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:I really think I shouldn't waste my time re reading shi'te posted by someone in seach of a nutsack.

Yeah , you had better get back to picking arguments with little kids hadn't you. Big man

Just as soon as you give them permission to take their tounges out of your a'rse I might just do that .

Are you refering to me there Woof, because I often agree with S@int and that I think he's a good bloke ?

Please explain ?

Are you a kid ?

by **Bam** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:25 pm

woof woof ! wrote:
Bam wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:
s@int wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:I really think I shouldn't waste my time re reading shi'te posted by someone in seach of a nutsack.

Yeah , you had better get back to picking arguments with little kids hadn't you. Big man

Just as soon as you give them permission to take their tounges out of your a'rse I might just do that .

Are you refering to me there Woof, because I often agree with S@int and that I think he's a good bloke ?

Please explain ?

Are you a kid ?

Compared to you possibly ?

by **woof woof !** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:28 pm

.

I'm not that f'uckin' old and your not that young, stand down Bam.

by **Bam** » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:29 pm

woof woof ! wrote: .

I'm not that f'uckin' old and your not that young, stand down Bam.

Well okay then, but as the usual cries go for Sabre .....

Leave S@int alone !

Liverpool FC Forum

The dude is in the building! - Peace n love y'all

Who is online