Liverpool FC Forum

Woollyback wrote:

unless i'm very mistaken those are chives.


my iq is among the top 3% of the country i'll have you know

woof woof ! wrote:

s@int wrote:I have only posted now because you tried to make a joke of it after banning him. Its not a joke and you should know better.

I'm not making a joke of his "ban", I'm laughing at the fact that he's apparently running around weeping about how I have always disliked him and others "who should know better" believe every line they're fed.

I make no apologies, yer don't like ? sue me

Kharhaz wrote:Out of interest, has my post about Maypax being a teenager been deleted or am I going nuts? No arguments from me either way, im just interested , save my sanity !

Yes, mate--collateral damage I'm afraid. 

Kharhaz wrote:I dont like my views being deleted.  Wrong or right, this is a forum. My point about maypax was well within my right to voice an opinion.

Posted before I saw this bit.  So, to clarify.  Your comments last night were deleted--not because there was anything wrong with them--but because they quoted a post that needed to be deleted.  I suppose I could have just edited out the quoted part and left the rest but your post would have seemed awfully strange without the context.  No offense intended.



Now, as for this Maypax business, I really think that people are blowing everything out of proportion.  First of all, Maypax hasn't been permanently banned, he's been temporarily suspended.  And while the posting of Woof's PM was the final straw, the cards were surely down to a larger pattern of behaviour going back at least a couple of months with the young lad.  As Mods we sometimes need to send a firm message when gentler ones aren't sinking in and I'm sure that's what's happened in this case. 

The irony, of course, is that Maypax would probably have been reinstated by now if people, including Maypax himself, had just let sleeping dogs lie (see what I did there? ).  But, the constant carping over a decision about which few people--including me--have all the facts has understandably frustrated my colleague (who is, by the way, an exemplary Mod) and I don't blame him for getting a little surly.  My advice would be for everyone to just leave it now, let things settle back down and I'm sure we'll see Maypax again before too long.

woof woof ! wrote:

andy_g wrote:come on, chill out everybody. seems to me like maypax's temporary 'ban' is nothing more than the proverbial cold shower. i don't think there is any malice in woof's actions and we know the old hippy is no power tripper.

I admit to being p'issed off with Maypax's posting of my PM when I carded him Andy  , but Maypax and "friends" were told the ban was a temporary "sin bin" action, or as you have described it , a "cold shower".

Some however seem determined to make it more than that.

Bad Bob wrote:

Kharhaz wrote:I dont like my views being deleted.  Wrong or right, this is a forum. My point about maypax was well within my right to voice an opinion.

Posted before I saw this bit.  So, to clarify.  Your comments last night were deleted--not because there was anything wrong with them--but because they quoted a post that needed to be deleted.  I suppose I could have just edited out the quoted part and left the rest but your post would have seemed awfully strange without the context.  No offense intended.



Now, as for this Maypax business, I really think that people are blowing everything out of proportion.  First of all, Maypax hasn't been permanently banned, he's been temporarily suspended.  And while the posting of Woof's PM was the final straw, the cards were surely down to a larger pattern of behaviour going back at least a couple of months with the young lad.  As Mods we sometimes need to send a firm message when gentler ones aren't sinking in and I'm sure that's what's happened in this case. 

The irony, of course, is that Maypax would probably have been reinstated by now if people, including Maypax himself, had just let sleeping dogs lie (see what I did there? ).  But, the constant carping over a decision about which few people--including me--have all the facts has understandably frustrated my colleague (who is, by the way, an exemplary Mod) and I don't blame him for getting a little surly.  My advice would be for everyone to just leave it now, let things settle back down and I'm sure we'll see Maypax again before too long.

I think you are mistaken Bob. There was no "constant carping", and as far as I am aware (and I get on here a little bit) his previous "form" was an argument with someone in which he wasn't the instigator, and posting an obituary that Woof didn't happen to like.

I would be interested to know..... hands up anyone who has been banned for posting a PM ?

you can put your hand down now Maypax.

A little common sense and all this cr@p would have been avoided.

Maybe if some dogs had slept a little deeper we wouldn't be having this problem now (see what I did there?  )

This is my first and last post on the banning........ hopefully!

Igor Zidane wrote:As far as i'm aware PM , means PRIVATE MESSAGE . Which is exactly why you don't post it on an open forum . Anyway stop being all faggoty about it and enjoy another glorious win . Maxi pads will be back on posting women hatred stuff again  i'm sure.

Bam wrote:

Igor Zidane wrote:As far as i'm aware PM , means PRIVATE MESSAGE . Which is exactly why you don't post it on an open forum . Anyway stop being all faggoty about it and enjoy another glorious win . Maxi pads will be back on posting women hatred stuff again  i'm sure.

Like private messages have always stayed that way on this board before.

Dont be such a hypocrite.