Kharhaz wrote:hahhahahhahaa the irony isnt lost peewee ! I guess that is the solution though stop giving giving aid and adopt african familys ! think about it, cooking tea when you get home, new football everyday for 10p and washing and ironing done. My doors already open !
Big Niall wrote:BarryBelfast wrote:Kharhaz wrote:I just feel its a great shame that so many people in this country are acknowledging the troubles in africa and trying to do there bit but in reality nothing is happening. Our money isnt going where it should be. Like I stated, we see the small parts of our money going somewhere but the money we are actually raising should have stabalised a majority of Africa and yet its worse off now than it was then (as Greenred pointed out). No money from me next year I want results !
Thats really annoyed me reading that actually.
Our money goes in the right direction but unfortunately is subject to the rules of the country it enters!We as a nation with regulations and taxes must respect other nations and their laws even if they are primative and unfair.
Only a sheltered mind would say that £65million does not make a difference....Of that 65 yes a lot is skimmed off by 3rd world governments to feed fatcats...this is wrong but also a fact of life and the way our wicked world works....That part of it,is out of our hands!
Im not ashamed to say that comic relief made me cry last night...............Watching a WOMAN weep with joy because she had a mosquito net that cost £2.50 that will save her childrens lives from Maleria makes all the tax etc. seem unimportant! Watching Ant and Dec in a tinhut ghetto telling us that a measly £90 can build a toilet for 10,000 people makes me happy!
A.e post that deserves contempt....Perhaps the initial poster should starve himself,loose his mother to AIDs,live in a mudhut with 12 family members and continously have the flu??
A disgraceful post that...
Our money DOES get through,a percentage actually does !What are we to do Stand back and say nothing or do the little we can....Money makes a difference!
I agree with Barry.
If somebody donates £10 and £8 gets stolen then £2 still helps build a well or something in Africa.
As for the poor in Britain/western world - come on mate, there is no comparison in standards.
ok i am joking here, of course they wont do that. I find it admirable that people give to charity when i wont even give money to beggars in the street (and believe there arelots in bangkok). but I always have the belief that by giving people charity allows them to take responsibility away from themsselves or their elected governments.
Bamaga man wrote:BarryBelfast wrote:Bamaga man wrote:That money would be put in better use at Home (UK) Raise it for the National health service, or abused kids etc. We always do these comic relief things every year which is a good idea. Didnt Bill gates donate 40 billion to wiping out diseases related in and around Africa and the world. I think charity needs to start at home and raise theses funds for our own people also.
So its OK to spend billions on the olympic shi.te?
£125 per head for each living UK resident?Excluding all the dole sponging refugees that drive taxis!Id rather my money hit Africa than the East of London....
I didnt mention the olympics Barry, and even still their taxes paid by the British public to the government. Its upto our government what they do with it really. For me personally I'd rather see our taxes go towards anything thats good for the British economy.
Comic relief is a fund raiser a totally different use of money, which in theory is a lovely idea. To help the "needy", I wonder how many other first world countries donate the amounts the British do EVERY year ?
A few African countires had there debts wiped by the EU didnt they ?
We've been donating for almost two decades if not longer any more. The donations run easily into the Billions I reckon and yet you still here things like ' if we could just get good clean drinking water to these people, their lives would be so much better' FFS ! What have they done in all this time, its the 21st centuary and it doesnt seem much improvements been made. Its time for their own governments to address these issues.
I'd guarentee you if half these nations were still under the British empire, or any other coloney these problems would of well and truly been iradicated by now.
Homebooby wrote:you should be ashamed of yourselves for turning your back on them.
Homebooby wrote:I've read the posts up until here with amazement at the views expressed.
We're talking about a huge country that is completely devastated and expected a few 100 million to resolve the issue. This coming from a 'leading' nation that has pumped an extra 57 billion into its' own health service in the last 10 years with little visible difference in performance, even with all the skills, education and managerial ability that we have in the country.
Yes, there is corruption, but it doesn't mean that none of the money is getting through, or not needed. Of course it is. To see that you could build a school for a whole village by just staying in one weekend should humble you to your very soul...let's not even get into what it costs to follow a premiership side.
What I read into the films that they were showing was that they were trying to get across that the initial crisis was keeping people alive. They have succeeded in that mostly...now the next stage is to educate and have them able to support themselves. This doesn't happen in a measly 20 years, it is generations of work and you should be ashamed of yourselves for turning your back on them.
Ace Ventura wrote:By the way how funny was 500 miles with Potter and andy pipkin![]()
I was p!ssing meself
peewee wrote:Ace Ventura wrote:By the way how funny was 500 miles with Potter and andy pipkin![]()
I was p!ssing meself
as if by magic
potter and pipkin
Sabre wrote:Filter system eh?
Well, let's test how lazy are the IT guys at your work
Give it a shot
Put the youtube adress in that box, and tell me what happens
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests