New war breaking out as we speak?

Please use this forum for general Non-Football related chat

Postby IstanBuL-FenerBaHce » Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:54 pm

I have many things to write as i did in the past pages, but i have no time for tonight.

It's amazing Metalhead, how can you be so calm.. ???
Image
User avatar
IstanBuL-FenerBaHce
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Istanbul-Turkey

Postby Red @ Heart » Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:24 pm

is this relavent???

check it out, no offense to anyone but she may speak the truth,  take 5 mins to listen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WLoasfOLpQ
Image
"GERAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARD what a goal"
User avatar
Red @ Heart
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:50 am

Postby Judge » Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:22 am

Judge wrote:the next image is very bad. only over 18's


israel says they are gonna fuck lebanon, israeli defense minister seen below reckons so





 
























































Image

:D

is this still relevant to the argument



:D   :D
Image
User avatar
Judge
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 20477
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:21 am

Postby puroresu » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:19 am

SouthCoastShankly wrote:
puroresu wrote:
joko wrote:hollysh1t, this getting worse!

General Says Iran Should 'Prepare' To Fight Israel, U.S.

July 31, 2006 -- The head of Iran's Revolutionary Guards has called on his troops to "prepare themselves to get even" with Israel and the United States.

Iran's semi-official Fars news agency quoted General Yahya Rahim Safavi as saying on July 30 that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would announce the timing for any such action.

(AFP, Reuters)

Inshallah.  I hope and Pray Iran move their army to defend the Muslims of Lebanon and Palestine

Iran wouldn't dare. Its the excuse the US would need to declare ware on Iran, Iran would be obliterated.

What the same US army which cant control Iraq and struggle to contain mujahaideen fighters. That army is stretched as it is and would never dare to invade Iran.  Every Iranian man would resist that invasion/
User avatar
puroresu
 
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:30 am

Postby dawson99 » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:32 am

Dawson say: War deos not detirmine who is right, but who is left :blues:
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby 112-1077774096 » Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:27 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:
peewee wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:
Woollyback wrote:
supersub wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Iran wouldn't dare. Its the excuse the US would need to declare ware on Iran, Iran would be obliterated.

That's why no middle east country dare come to the aid of Lebanon.

don't forget israel has one of the most powerful militaries on the planet and aren't overly shy about using it either, even without the US no middle eastern country would dare take on the israelis in a conventional war. WITH US support it would be curtains for any other country involved

feckin bonkers the middle east, i wonder what would happen if there wasn't any oil there though? ???

Imagine if you will , what will happen when Iran gets a nuclear capability .  :wwww

yeah, just like north korea now have weapons of mass distruction but the yanks havent invaded them, i wonder why?

oh i know, because they have no oil and quite possible the main reason is that they would spank the good old US of A into next week

:D

Its true that N Korea are a nuclear power but they don't have any strategic advantage. The big nuclear powers all have geographic advantage - they can strike any continent in the world, whereas North Korea can only just about reach the outskirts of Alaska.

Somehow I can't see the US being spanked as you put it

woof has already answered this, i do mean an invasion of North Korea.

there is a big clue what i meant in my post, its the word 'invaded' funnily enough
112-1077774096
 

Postby Judge » Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:29 pm

peewee wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:
peewee wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:
Woollyback wrote:
supersub wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Iran wouldn't dare. Its the excuse the US would need to declare ware on Iran, Iran would be obliterated.

That's why no middle east country dare come to the aid of Lebanon.

don't forget israel has one of the most powerful militaries on the planet and aren't overly shy about using it either, even without the US no middle eastern country would dare take on the israelis in a conventional war. WITH US support it would be curtains for any other country involved

feckin bonkers the middle east, i wonder what would happen if there wasn't any oil there though? ???

Imagine if you will , what will happen when Iran gets a nuclear capability .  :wwww

yeah, just like north korea now have weapons of mass distruction but the yanks havent invaded them, i wonder why?

oh i know, because they have no oil and quite possible the main reason is that they would spank the good old US of A into next week

:D

Its true that N Korea are a nuclear power but they don't have any strategic advantage. The big nuclear powers all have geographic advantage - they can strike any continent in the world, whereas North Korea can only just about reach the outskirts of Alaska.

Somehow I can't see the US being spanked as you put it

woof has already answered this, i do mean an invasion of North Korea.

there is a big clue what i meant in my post, its the word 'invaded' funnily enough

i'll buy that for a dollar

:D
Image
User avatar
Judge
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 20477
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:21 am

Postby woof woof ! » Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:25 pm

Judge wrote:
Judge wrote:the next image is very bad. only over 18's


israel says they are gonna fuck lebanon, israeli defense minister seen below reckons so





 
























































Image

:D

is this still relevant to the argument



:D   :D

The blank space isn't , unless of course you think it still provides a suprise .  :D    :D    :D
Image

Image
User avatar
woof woof !
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 21225
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:22 am
Location: Here There and Everywhere

Postby metalhead » Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:52 pm

IstanBuL-FenerBaHce wrote:I have many things to write as i did in the past pages, but i have no time for tonight.

It's amazing Metalhead, how can you be so calm.. ???

I can write 3 pages condeming and cursing israel.  :D

but i always try to be calm, im still so mad of what is happening.
:angry:

I'm joining Hizballah  :laugh:
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Judge » Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:07 am

woof woof ! wrote:
Judge wrote:
Judge wrote:the next image is very bad. only over 18's


israel says they are gonna fuck lebanon, israeli defense minister seen below reckons so





 
























































Image

:D

is this still relevant to the argument



:D   

The blank space isn't , unless of course you think it still provides a surprise .  :D    :D 

i see what you mean woof, but the space is only relevant to rafadodd, who needs the space to ensure it is work safe :D
Image
User avatar
Judge
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 20477
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:21 am

Postby metalhead » Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 am

an interesting article i read today

Remembering Nothing
The common thread of the administration’s policy in Iraq and Lebanon is an ignorance of history and a willful disregard of its lessons

President Bush has this annoying tendency of enlarging problems, thinking that makes him a bold and visionary leader. An ordinary ceasefire that stops people from killing each other isn’t good enough for Bush and his diplomatic automaton, Condoleezza Rice, who sees the violence in Lebanon and Iraq as the “birth pangs of a new Middle East.”

Secretary of State Rice is holding out for “a sustainable ceasefire,” which reminds me of the old Gershwin tune, “Nice Work If You Can Get It.” A grand bargain that can last into the future is a laudable goal but well out of reach for an administration that is weakened and isolated on the world stage. Why not settle for what every American government has done until this one? Stop the fighting first and then resolve the conflict as best you can.

Living from crisis to crisis is no fun, but it’s better than the alternative of maimed children, hundreds of thousands of displaced Lebanese refugees and a million terrified northern Israelis confined to bomb shelters. The Bush Doctrine in the Israeli-Hizbullah conflict is an extension of the theory applied in Iraq: that anything is better than the status quo. Bush’s worldview emanates from a childish need to do everything different from his predecessors. He operates from a gut belief that if he dares to reshuffle the deck in the Middle East, the result will be better than the hand American presidents traditionally play. The reverse is happening. Iraq is on its way to becoming the next Lebanon, and Lebanon is descending back into the hell that made its very name synonymous with sectarian warfare.

Four years of Bush-style wars have made Americans wish they could wash their hands of the rest of the world. A New York Times/CBS News poll found a strong isolationist streak emerging, with 58 percent saying the United States has no responsibility to resolve the conflict between Israel and other countries in the Middle East, and 56 percent supporting a timetable for getting out of Iraq. A substantial majority of 62 percent say the Iraq war has not been worth it in terms of lives lost and dollars spent. Yet there are no signs the administration is backing away from its determination to stay the course in Iraq and to give Israel the room it needs to inflict more damage on Hizbullah.

The common thread in both these conflicts is an ignorance of history and a willful disregard of history’s lessons. Some problems have roots deeper than any army can destroy. I spent the past week at a retreat in Abiquiu, N.M., called Ghost Ranch. Set in the midst of the desert landscapes made famous by the painter Georgia O’Keefe, it is a place to come for contemplation and spiritual rebirth. “Welcome to liberal Presbyterian heaven,” a gray-haired volunteer said as I checked in for my room assignment. Ghost Ranch is under the auspices of the Presbyterian Church, but other faiths and nonbelievers are welcome. I was there to participate in a seminar called “Discerning the Signs of the Times,” and much of our discussion centered on the Middle East. A fellow presenter, Dale Bishop, taught Iranian studies at Columbia University and for 20 years served as Middle East area executive for the United Church of Christ. He spent much of his time reminding us of Lebanon’s bloody history and how Iraq seems destined to go down the same path.

Both countries are artifacts of the colonial era. Winston Churchill drew the border lines for Iraq. The first Iraqi king was a Saudi-born royal who had not set foot in the new nation until he was installed. Lebanon was carved out of Syria by the French, who wanted a place for the Christian population. “It wasn’t totally whim, but it was a lot whim,” says Bishop. Lebanon has 17 sects, including a variety of Christians, Shiite and Sunni Muslims and Druze, and they fought a prolonged civil war that didn’t end until 1991. It was said that the fighting would continue until only a single Lebanese was left, and he would look at himself in the mirror and shoot the mirror. U.S. troops were in the middle of that mess until 241 American servicemen were ambushed and killed in their barracks in 1983. That was enough for President Reagan. He pulled out U.S. troops and launched a little war in Grenada to save face.

The Lebanese continued to fight it out without U.S. forces, an outcome Bishop believes will eventually happen in Iraq. “And it’s not going to be pretty,” he says. “We walked into a huge mess, and we’re not going to achieve a military victory—and our pride prevents us from just leaving. We have to cover it over …” Here he paused a bit mischievously, mindful of his audience. “Maybe another aircraft carrier appearance saying ‘It’s over. We won. Goodbye’.” If making problems bigger doesn’t work, there’s always the option of walking away. Either way, it’s a new Middle East that’s being born, and it’s Bush’s baby.

by: Eleanor Clift
Newsweek


Link
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby metalhead » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:10 am

Well today Olmert said the most silliest comment i heard in my life : "We are destroying Hizballah's infrastructure". What the F*ck!!!?!?

Also the Israelian forces said that the building they bombed that killed 60 people because they thought there were hizballah firing rockets from that building, that they admit there were no rockets being fired from there. It means they deliberatley killed those innocent people to turn the people against hizballah!

Most of the israelian government officials said that this battle against Hizballah cannot be won and it causing heavy casualties in the israelian army! but stupid f*cking olmert still wants to try to beat them!

Another reason that Hizballah are not terrorists, The UN said that they won't put hizballah in the terrorist list.

What is so funny that Hizballah are saying that they are winning the war, and Israel are saying vice versa.  :D

who to believe? well i'm going to join the action!

:laugh:
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Woollyback » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:34 am

what the israelis are doing in lebanon is probably the best thing ever to happen to hezbollah's PR machine. rather than destroying them they are almost certainly breeding a whole new generation of hezbollah members eager to get even with israel. absolute madness

i've no doubt hezbollah aren't exactly angelic little cherubs who wouldn't hurt a fly but israel's actions are barbaric and a ridiculous over-reaction to 2 soldiers being taken hostage
b*ll*c*ks and s*i*e
User avatar
Woollyback
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12400
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: Manchester

Postby Judge » Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:24 pm

frank bough :D

:cool:
Image
User avatar
Judge
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 20477
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:21 am

Postby metalhead » Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:41 pm

an update on whats happening:

Israel and hizballah are still having some ground fights in south of lebanon. Alot of israeli soldiers are being wonded and about 5 israeli soldiers were killed today. A lebanese source says  that almost 80 hizballah soldiers died during the fighting from the start of the war. It shows that Israel are lieng about how many hizballah soldiers are dieng.

Hizballah won't stop the fire until every israeli soldier leaves lebanon and Israel won't stop the fire until the NATO force arrives! the UN said it will send the NATO force when there is a ceasefire! so its really complicated!!!

Nasrallah spoke today!!! he called Olmert " a :censored: idiotic prime minister who wants to show he is the best and he is the most idiotic israelian prime minister of all time"

he also stated that hizballah will stop firing rockets on israelian towns if Israel stops bombing lebanon. He then stated that he prefers a soldier vs soldier ground fight.

Then he went on cursing israel and etc...

After that he came to this quote :" If Israel hits beirut again in the coming days, Hizballah WILL hit Tel Aviv"

UEFA need to take that into note as Tel Abib city is in threat, Hizballah will seriously hit that city if israel does a stupid move and hit beirut again.

These are some news concerning today

cheers
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat Forum

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e