The debate started out with me saying
" The best teams dont often win knockout tournaments"
This could be argued too that your the best team if you win a football tournament. I dont think its true as its a one off game and its about being better on the day. Wrexham knocked Arsenal out of the F.A cup a few years back and bigger clubs can often get scalped.
He agreed but then went on to say the same thing can be said about the league. No no I said, over the course of 38 games whoever finishes on top of the league is the best team throughout the season.
My Dad wouldnt have any of it, personally and I told him its because he's bitter about Chelsea he always gose on about there money. And that they play
and win games, the way he sees it is that the winners of the league, namely Chelsea get THE BEST RESULTS but are not the best team. He reckons the better side are the side who plays the better football, but still finishes fith. He said and admitted to prove his point Spurs were a better team than Arsenal last year even though they eventually finished below them. Because they played better football, he thinks Chelsea got the best results but arent the best team in the league. Now as much as I cant stand Chelsea I have to disagree, if you finish top at the end of a league campaign, you are the best team IMO even if you do win ugly , grind out results and get a few lucky ones on the way.
I even asked him about the old boring boring Arsenal he still kept his opinion, whats that of yours.
