Lando_Griffin wrote:The Ace1983 wrote:It does sound like you are suggesting that it is his scottishness which makes him favor devolution and makes him a. And this isn't the first time that a dodgy comment about Islam has appeared in one of your posts. You did call it a "crack pot" religion the other day.
If I'm mistaken I will be more tha happy to retract the statement, but I fear that won't happen.
I think, if you read back, you will find I was referring to Bin Laden's taint on Islam, and not the true religon itself.
And I am sorry, but any religon which thinks killing is a good thing IS "c*ck-eyed" in my book. (And "c*ck-eyed", where I come from, means bent or rather "not straight". (As in: "That picture on the wall is c*ck-eyed".)
I have absolutely nothing against any religon, provided it doesn't try to justify mass genocide.
I have no problem with Muslims, other than the ones who bitch and moan about our national practises, such as a butcher hanging a pig in the window.
I do not try to stop people of differing beliefs from putting rice in their hair, or wailing to a wall, or even being Baptised.
SO why should followers of other religons be able to change all our ways to accomodate them, even though they come here to avoid being murdered in their own countries? As a nation, we are doing them a favour, are we not?
It just doesn't make sense to me, or the Muslim, Pakistani and Indian friends I have. They all think that it's absurd aswell.
I am not a racist, that I can promise you. I just say it as it is, or at least how I see it.
If more people did that, the World would be a much safer place.
Then I retract my statement and apologise for misunderstanding.

. And this isn't the first time that a dodgy comment about Islam has appeared in one of your posts. You did call it a "crack pot" religion the other day.







