by kazza » Sat Oct 03, 2026 4:51 am
In 2020, UEFA banned City from European competition for two seasons over alleged Financial Fair Play breaches, but the Court of Arbitration for Sport overturned the ban. Importantly, CAS did not simply declare that nothing had happened: some alleged conduct was ruled time-barred, other allegations were not sufficiently established on the evidence, and although City were still found to have failed to cooperate with UEFA’s investigation, they got away with it.
Fast-forward to the Premier League case. City were charged in February 2023 after a lengthy investigation and have now been found guilty by an independent commission of the serious financial-rule breaches, although City deny wrongdoing and are appealing.
One of the interesting arguments now concerns procedure. The Premier League subsequently introduced much tighter “fast-track” disciplinary timetables, designed to stop financial cases dragging on for years. City are challenging aspects of the process and have lodged an appeal alleging significant legal and factual errors, in essence they will argue that a speeded up process would be unfair.
So there is an obvious irony: City previously benefited when UEFA’s case ran into limitation and evidential problems, while today their lawyers are challenging the fairness of a Premier League process operating under rules designed to make financial enforcement faster and harder to delay.
After they lose the appeal they will take it to the High Court and argue the PL process was unfair. I think the more this drags on and the nastier it gets will make the relationship with PL untenable, How could they possibility continue playing in the PL?