Doeboy » Wed May 03, 2017 10:56 am wrote:Real shame his career has been unhinged by his glass body. One of the best natural finishers in the league but think clubs are going to be very reluctant to spend any large amounts on him
Fee may be structured ina way where we get paid an initial fee and if he completes a set number of games we get another payment.
ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Wed May 03, 2017 2:06 pm wrote:For the money we are going to get for him we are probably better off keeping him.
Thommo's perm » Sat May 06, 2017 7:59 am wrote:ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Wed May 03, 2017 2:06 pm wrote:For the money we are going to get for him we are probably better off keeping him.
Quotes like this baffle me? If a player, any player, is not fit for purpose, then get rid! No passengers aloud!
LFC's success wasnt based on mend and make do, or any type of sympathy. The reason why we won all those trophies and dominated European football for so long was because we were ruthless with players who didnt cut the mustard. Sometimes too ruthless maybe, but sentiment has no part in success at the highest level. Who gives a shiny sh'it about how much money we get? We want the best players, not a good return on our investment.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 159 guests