Liverpool FC Forum

by **the great one** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:12 pm

do we need desailly i think yes wat about you

by **jonnymac1979** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:14 pm

by **the great one** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:15 pm

jonnymac1979 wrote:NO.

he's a free agent aresnal tryed to sign him

by **supersub** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:16 pm

I'll leave this for now to get a consensus of opinion on this outrageous thread.give me a sign if you want this moving to the silly farm....or prem.discussion or the bin.... or....f**k

by **the great one** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:32 pm

supersub wrote:I'll leave this for now to get a consensus of opinion on this outrageous thread.give me a sign if you want this moving to the silly farm....or prem.discussion or the bin.... or....f**k

hey leave it out man u no we need desailly to win the league

by **madred** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:34 pm

Desailly??? The great one we should have been calling him that too if he had retired around 2 seasons ago. His name has been ruined due to some terrible defending both for club and country. No thanks.

by **the great one** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:40 pm

we need desailly even if its just to train with biscan

by **LFC #1** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:03 am

put this is in the silly farm supersub, Desailly is ******.

by **A.B.** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:05 am

LFC #1 wrote:put this is in the silly farm supersub, Desailly is ******.

what he said

Great one, how much bullsh!t will you post?

This what you have said in the past two days

-Heskey is more missed than Owen
-Heskey is a LFC legend
-Heskey is a better player than Baros
-Baros is ******, we should sell him
-Mista is ******, we shouldn't sign him for FREE
-We don't need Gerrard
-We should sign Desailly

Keep on adding things to your list mate

by **bigmick** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 2:03 am

Tgo and Jg are obviously not to be taken too seriously. In the same bracket as the H man me thinks. 'Bless 'em, they knows no better. Best we don't encourage 'em by replying.

by **greenred** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 3:11 am

Yet another thread started by a manc.

by **Paul C** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:14 am

NO, he's past it, we don't need to buy players that aren't good enough for Chelsea :;):

by **addicted norwegian** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:20 am

Paul C wrote:NO, he's past it, we don't need to buy players that aren't good enough for Chelsea

I have to say that I disagree with you on one point. I totally agree that we have no need for Desailly, I guess he will end up in Saudi Arabia or something, finishing his career with a luqurative contract. But I do think that William Gallas would make a great impact in our defence-line, even if he`s not considered good enough for the starting 11 at the Bridge

by **stmichael** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:24 am

addicted norwegian wrote:But I do think that William Gallas would make a great impact in our defence-line, even if he`s not considered good enough for the starting 11 at the Bridge

i said that in the summer. gallas is class

by **addicted norwegian** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:52 am

stmichael wrote:
addicted norwegian wrote:But I do think that William Gallas would make a great impact in our defence-line, even if he`s not considered good enough for the starting 11 at the Bridge

i said that in the summer. gallas is class

Yeah, last seasons performance was great and one would think that he`s too good a player to sit on the Chelsea-bench.

Liverpool FC Forum

Desailly - Sign

Who is online