babu wrote:primodua wrote:would we want duncan "horsesh.it" ferguson for 10k?
would we want michael "c.unt" essien for 1 mil?
i think not!!
What are you on about?
primodua wrote:babu wrote:primodua wrote:would we want duncan "horsesh.it" ferguson for 10k?
would we want michael "c.unt" essien for 1 mil?
i think not!!
What are you on about?
very simple babu,
some players are meant to wear the jersey
and some players are not.
i just cannot bear to watch these players no matter how good they are to wear the red jersey and so is nistlerooy.
same goes to our gerrard. Can you see him wearing blue although he's good for shi.tski?
GunGod wrote:If this post had been started by a newbie just 100+ posts loads of you would have jumped on him.
Keep your double standards in keep mates.
GunGod wrote:If this post had been started by a newbie just 100+ posts loads of you would have jumped on him.
Keep your double standards in keep mates.
red37 wrote:i think it was monday night on sky sports 'your on sky sports' prog. when the presenter asked beagrie and claridge in response to an email, " should liverpool go for van nistlerooy" ?
beagrie flatly came out and said..." we couldnt afford him"
![]()
alongside man city showing almost 17 million in pre-tax profits this week, compared to our state of financial affairs. i find it embarrassing a club of our stature and kudos cant be taken seriously in the transfer market. it seems.
the new stadium is obviously having its toll on everything...
as for the point, i personally dont want ruud van nistlerooy here, why? he isnt slow but he aint much of an improvement on what we have in that respect. we have enough so-called hold up players. now we need a poacher.... if we can afford one
Ace Ventura wrote:we dont needs players of that ilk, but he would be a major success in our system.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 90 guests