eds wrote:hishhish wrote:I say being second and 10 points off is only important relative to who is first. Look at the money, players and stability that Man U. have. Does that not explain any of the 10 points difference??
I actually think Liverpool (with the help of Rafa) have been outperforming for years. Can anyone really say we have a better set of players than Chelsea or Man U.??
Hashman, we were top of the ladder only a few weeks ago.
We were still that "unstable" club that we are today, with the same owners and we were first! The Mwancs were the same "stable" club they are today and were 7pts behind!
Im sorry mate but ur clutching at straws with the way ur trying to defend the indefensible. The reason why we arent first ISNT just because of this so called "unstability".
It has largely to do with the manager as well!
Doesn't explain :-
Stoke 0-0 Liverpool
Liverpool 1-1 Bitters
Wigan 1-1 Liverpool
Liverpool 1-1 Man City
Middlesboro 2-0 Liverpool
Just two league wins in 2009 so far, a last ditch win at FP and a last gasp win against 10 man Chelsea thanks to two individual errors - in fact I'd say both were thanks to individual errors.
Rafa is to blame for the "instability", he's buying players of around the same level as he was when he started and so we're simply swapping ordinary players in for ordinary ones out. Bar perhaps Riera, our best starting XI is the same as last season so there is room for stability. But I'm sure then the counter-argument will be our starting XI isn't as good as man utd's. That as may be, but it shouldn't need to be to beat the teams named that we didn't in 2009 - unless people want to suggest our squad isn't as good as the bitters', boro's, citeh's, Wigan's or Stoke's.
Not winning enough games is our problem, even in the Champions League we don't win that often, but the format lets Rafa get away with it. That's why he's more suited to that competition, and human nature would incline people towards what they're good at....................