by Owzat » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:59 am
CHELSEA : points = 12/12, position = 1st.
They've beaten Hull (17th last season), Sunderland (16th last season), Fulham and Burnley (promoted) so the only really convincing win was at Craven Cottage as the rest finished outside the top 15 in England.
VERDICT : yet to be seriously tested, but a win is a win and three points. Beating the rest is all the mancs did well last season
Chelsea : points = 9/12, position = 3rd.
Less than convincing in all their games this season, lost at newly promoted Burnley and scraped a home wni over Arsenal despite being second best. Their win against Wigan was convincing in scoreline, but two goals in the last five minutes and their usual 'fortune' of two or three quick goals before Rafa's normally made his first substitution to soften up their favourite opposition - the mancs have a 100% record over Wigan P10 W10 D0 L0 F30 A4
VERDICT : not playing well but picking up wins and a good booster to their GD. I think they will be more vulnerable than last season, but still have enough attacking options in their locker to beat most of the weaker teams
ARSENAL : points = 6/9, position = 6th.
Stuffed the bitters at their's, not many can boast as convincing a win away to that lot. They beat pompey convincingly too, then put out a convincing performance against the mancs only to lose to a penalty and own goal.
VERDICT : playing the best football of the big four, but still showing a tendancy not to make most of dominance in games like at old twatford
LIVERPOOL : points = 6/12, position = 7th.
Lose, win, lose, win sums it up. Conceded too many goals from set pieces, zonal marking back in the spotlight and just not convincing performances all-round, even in winning. Nine goals scored in four games sounds good, but seven in two wins and two in two defeats doesn't read so good, neither does one clean sheet and seven conceded in the other three games. Losing at spudz was not unacceptable, but the performance seems to have set the tone for the season. Losing at home to villa was poor and that one result puts as much doubt in my mind as the other performances combined
VERDICT : need to improve and maintain some kind of levels of performance or it will be a struggle to finish top four let alone win the league
MAN CITY : points = 9/9, position = 4th.
Have to throw them in as they've a 100% record and spent a few countries' national debts this summer on players, but so far they've beaten Blackburn (15th last season), Wolves (newly promoted) and pompey (14th last season, rock bottom this without a point) so even less to write home about than Chelsea
TOTTENHAM : points = 12/12, position = 2nd.
After a poor start last season noone expected them to hit the ground running this season, they've beaten us (2nd last season), Hull 5-1 away, West Ham away and Brum at home. Maybe Hull were 17th last season, but 5-1 is a hammering away and Brum were newly promoted so not a big credit for only just beating them, but they've been more convincing than the big four sides bar Arsenal and compensate the less convincing performances with maximum points having beaten one of the big four already
VERDICT : excellent start, more convincing overall than the other five mentioned but will they be found out? Their defence is full of crocks, maybe they should spend less on flair attacking players who seem to be squeezing onto the bench, and more on a fit CB or two. 'arry's reported desperation to sign James suggests he thinks the GK is the problem, but I'd worry more about King, Woodgate and Dawson in terms of fitness and injury.
If I were able to swap our position/results/performances with one of the others, I'd pick spudz. Came out with three points from their 'big four' test, have won all their games and put GD on the board. Unlike Chelsea, the only team above them, they've won two potentially tricky games in Liverpool home and West Ham away.
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer