Reg wrote:We means Roy Berkley, the guy who changes the floodlight bulbs.
Dont bring the Roy debate into this thread please Thommo, there are already enough places to vent your feelings.
7_Kewell wrote:does anyone know if H&G are still trying to sue our new owners? It has gone all quiet on that front, which i'm taking as a positive that it will not ever happen
Reg wrote:Henry, who has been at Liverpool all week, was not as heartened by some of the discoveries he has made since taking over the club. "There were a number of unpleasant surprises when we did our due diligence because the wage bill is high and it's going to be higher next year – and we're not a young team," he said. "That was disappointing."
LFC2007 wrote:On Comolli: Though we don't who was primarily responsible for signing each player, I suppose we can assume that he had a major role in determining who they signed and on the whole that record looks pretty reasonable. Berbatov, Modric and Bale are the standout picks, and they're all top performers in the league now. You have a few numpties in there too, e.g. Zokora, Kaboul + Bentley (useful player, but way overrpriced), and then the likes of Huddlestone, Lennon, Bent (a tad overpriced, but no Babel) and a few other OK signings who compare better than a fair few of the ones we signed in the same period.
Plus, he was head scout at Arsenal for 7 yearsand that association with Wenger and his record of signing young, affordable talent bodes for us well I think. Remember, we're not necessarily looking for blockbuster signings, but more consistency throughout so when we look at our bench we see a Bent and not a Babel, a Huddlestone and not a Poulsen.
I expect Comolli to be the man who reports to NESV on the state of the team, so while his main responsibility will be to identify players worth signing i.e. chief scout, it will also be to report back to the owners on the performance of the manager. Someone at the club, independent of the manager and coaching staff, who has permanent oversight of progress on the pitch. I do hope that it can work. Key to it all may be who has the final say on transfers. In baseball it seems that the general manager is responsible for signings and the team manager is simply a head coach. Now, in baseball that may work since there isn't the same need to account for the requirements of the team - you either throw well, bat well, field well etc. (though I confess to knowing very little about that game, as with most American sports) or you don't, but a football team has an altogether different dynamic. There are many more different roles to fill and the best man to suss the right blend has to be the man who works day-in and day-out with the players - the manager and his coaching staff. That isn't to say I think managers shouldn't be accountable to somebody such as a director or football - they should: submitting your views for scrutiny is a good thing - but when there's a final decision to be made over who to sign, after all the discussions have taken place (and here you hope for some degree of consensus), then the manager's word has to be final.
Don't read too much into the rags boss, they're poison.Reg wrote:"I was upset about the assertion that they were leaving," Henry said. "There was one day when I read reports that we were not going to be involved in the transfer window because we do not have the funds. The next day I read that Torres and Reina were leaving."
Really hope they can emulate ^^^ into Liverpool.Reg wrote:"We are building a team. In Boston we have a team with an incredible collegial atmosphere."
Kharhaz wrote:Reg wrote:Henry, who has been at Liverpool all week, was not as heartened by some of the discoveries he has made since taking over the club. "There were a number of unpleasant surprises when we did our due diligence because the wage bill is high and it's going to be higher next year – and we're not a young team," he said. "That was disappointing."
The bill is going to be higher, so I am guessing then that Aquilani going out on loan is because of the ludicrous amount of wages he is on. Which also makes you question the wages of the other players that are out on loan.
What is Degen on?
rocky29 wrote:Kharhaz wrote:Reg wrote:Henry, who has been at Liverpool all week, was not as heartened by some of the discoveries he has made since taking over the club. "There were a number of unpleasant surprises when we did our due diligence because the wage bill is high and it's going to be higher next year – and we're not a young team," he said. "That was disappointing."
The bill is going to be higher, so I am guessing then that Aquilani going out on loan is because of the ludicrous amount of wages he is on. Which also makes you question the wages of the other players that are out on loan.
What is Degen on?
aqua was on 70 grand a week. So for joe cole to come for 90 grand a week aqua had to go to keep the wages down. Now then youve seen joe cole. How the feck can u pay someone 20 grand a week more is older than aqua and offers far less than aqua can. And injury wise there similar. Lets just see if aqua can keep fit till end of season. If he can then id say feck joe cole off and bring aqua back. He creates far more than joe ever did
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests