Benny The Noon » Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:35 pm wrote:Well I'm not sure it actually does happen "all the time"
I don't think the problem is this case getting too much attention it's others not getting enough.
Anytime a child is missing there should be massive attention - certainly a lot more than the celeb ***** which fills the headlines
And I think the little girl is alive somewhere and as cold as Kate McCann seems I don't think the parents had anything to do with it
StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:59 pm wrote:Without knowing the full facts my guess as to what happened is they've dosed the child up so she'll sleep. Came back to check on her and realised they've gave her an overdose.
They've then disposed of the body.
I think it was an accidental killing and they've moved the evidence so they don't get sent to jail.
Of course I could be completely wrong.... but something doesn't sit right for me.
jacdaniel » Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:17 am wrote:StuYesThatStu » Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:59 pm wrote:Without knowing the full facts my guess as to what happened is they've dosed the child up so she'll sleep. Came back to check on her and realised they've gave her an overdose.
They've then disposed of the body.
I think it was an accidental killing and they've moved the evidence so they don't get sent to jail.
Of course I could be completely wrong.... but something doesn't sit right for me.
That is quite believable and I thought the same myself before.
But I changed my opinion since as they could have gotten away scott free by now. Why keep her name out there and push to keep the case going if they were guilty.
Its a really strange case though. How could a child go missing like that with so little evidence if the parents really were checking on her every 30 minutes or so.
The abductor would have had to have gotten a bit lucky with his timing or it was planned carefully.
Still wouldnt rule out one or both parents being involved or maybe one of their friends. Its baffling.
Benny The Noon » Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:59 pm wrote:The problem is if the McCanns had something to do with it where did the body go and when did they get rid of it. The timescales make it very hard for them to get rid of any body
RedSi35 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:55 pm wrote:I really never liked the smell of the 'official' story. The parents have always seemed demi-psychopathic in interviews.
Too ready to blame everyone else, except their own hedonistic stupidity - I have never seen a shred of remorse from two supposedly intelligent people who leave three small children in an unlocked hotel room while they go out for a jolly meal and drink-up with their mates. Self-pity, yes, but remorse? No.
Who answers "No comment" to police questions when they are trying to find her lost child? Kate McCann.
Interesting case, and I'll eat my suspicions with Mad Dog Sauce on if anyone other than the McCanns are responsible. It just won't lie down though. We need Columbo and Frank Cannon back on duty.
woof woof ! » Fri Oct 25, 2013 5:23 pm wrote:I'm wondering how many of the people in here that question the McCann's possible involvement have children of their own ?
For f'ucks sake if you are a parent you can imagine the pain the McCann's must be going through when they see some of the stuff that's aimed at them.
A Fu*king football site and people imo obviously without children of their own suggesting the parents may have been complicit in their child's disappearance.
Makes me f'ucking sick
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 18 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.