ICE-MAN » Fri May 11, 2012 6:52 pm wrote:Love the new kit! Warrior were very understanding and clever in their use of the flames and 96!
Things change and evolve, ie the shankly gates, moving the flames to the back, inserting the 96! It's a different design and the hillsborough disaster is still more than recognised, which it always should be!!
Let's not embarrass ourselves as a club by squabbling over consultation with justice groups etc and not contacting absolutely everyone about the design, and creating headlines for dumbass journos to create about infighting regarding the jersey etc!!
The kit is class and everyone is acknowledged!!!
zarababe » Fri May 11, 2012 6:11 pm wrote:You can't please everyone - I lurve it , the 96 are honoured too on the shirt, the club has a memorial and eternal flame at Anfield, we don't play on the 15th... this is grt and should contiue.
The 96 are honoured always !!
Roger Red Hat » Fri May 11, 2012 3:17 pm wrote:maltesemassive » Fri May 11, 2012 12:01 pm wrote:I like the old crest logo and the kit is very simple and slightly oldschool but I don't know why the logo containing the gates and the flames has been removed. I think the traditional crest should be plastered on the back and on the sleeves but the one with the gates and flames being removed altogether is an insult! It is an important memory for the club and marks respect for all the people associated with the hillsboro disaster. That logo along with the words "you'll never walk alone" are all fitting tributes to this great club and its history. I appreciate that we must get on with our lives but never ever should this club make people forget that horrible event. I'd say it is a disgrace to remove this logo. I also don't expect many people to buy it.
the... flames... are ... on... the... back...
we haven't insulted anyone
maltesemassive » Sat May 12, 2012 2:13 am wrote:Roger Red Hat » Fri May 11, 2012 3:17 pm wrote:maltesemassive » Fri May 11, 2012 12:01 pm wrote:I like the old crest logo and the kit is very simple and slightly oldschool but I don't know why the logo containing the gates and the flames has been removed. I think the traditional crest should be plastered on the back and on the sleeves but the one with the gates and flames being removed altogether is an insult! It is an important memory for the club and marks respect for all the people associated with the hillsboro disaster. That logo along with the words "you'll never walk alone" are all fitting tributes to this great club and its history. I appreciate that we must get on with our lives but never ever should this club make people forget that horrible event. I'd say it is a disgrace to remove this logo. I also don't expect many people to buy it.
the... flames... are ... on... the... back...
we haven't insulted anyone
Those flames on its own are rubbish! That logo we had before represented everything about LFC - YNWA, the gates, the flames, LFC, and the Liver bird. Separating these symbols is pathetic because its like it is separate to LFC. Also, sticking the number 96 is silly because the Hillsboro disaster affected many people, not just the 96. I often think about those people who were traumatised and injured and suffering PTSD. The previous logo meant so much more about what the club is about. Please urgently bring it back!
laza » Sat May 12, 2012 6:39 am wrote:Well anything is better then Candy days for me
I think this is great and I love the simple crest and memorial on the back looks excellent.
You always seeing the back in actions shot of football and for me its a far better tribute then being part of a convulted badge on the front
Only thing I would have prefer liked others is Sponsor to be in white lettering but I can with it
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 91 guests