Liverpool FC Forum

by **Woollyback** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:47 am

well one good thing that'll come of this is that hopefully people will stop going on about that fat f.uckin slapper jade goody

by **tubby** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:51 am

Yep. People will be talking about this for a long time.

by **destro** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:52 am

bavlondon wrote:
destro wrote:
Big Niall wrote:A man in his late forties asks you whether he can share his bed with your son of about ten years old. What would you say?

The guy was a paedo scumbag.

Just because he had immense talent (I like some of his music too) doesn't take away the fact that he wanted to "cuddle" up to children in bed and would create a fantasy world to entice them over.

How can the people here overlook this?

well said

Whats the difference between Jacko and Alex Ferguson.......Ferguson can still play Giggs next year

What's the difference between a pile of and you? A pile of can be cleaned up.

You blind lad? Jokes go in the joke thread.

Blind...No...didnt take the time to read the whole thread...yes, wind your neck in soft @rse

by **stmichael** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:53 am

Big Niall wrote:A man in his late forties asks you whether he can share his bed with your son of about ten years old. What would you say?

The guy was a paedo scumbag.

Just because he had immense talent (I like some of his music too) doesn't take away the fact that he wanted to "cuddle" up to children in bed and would create a fantasy world to entice them over.

How can the people here overlook this?

That's no way to talk about Arsene Wenger

by **Big Niall** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:59 am

bavlondon wrote:
Big Niall wrote:A man in his late forties asks you whether he can share his bed with your son of about ten years old. What would you say?

The guy was a paedo scumbag.

Just because he had immense talent (I like some of his music too) doesn't take away the fact that he wanted to "cuddle" up to children in bed and would create a fantasy world to entice them over.

How can the people here overlook this?

A court found him not guilty and was never charged with anything in the end.

He probably had childhood related issues. My take is that he was never allowed to enjoy a normal childhood having been a superstar from such a young age. Also a lot of people would describe him as a 'big kid'. Sure it was a bit quirky but he was not a paedo.

Were you in the bed? No so what makes you an authority on the matter?

B.S

If he wasn't famous there is no way you'd let your child anywhere near him.

That, "I'm just a big child too" or "I love children too much" is what paedophiles convince themselves.

He bought his way out of at least one case. Without the child testifiying, the court just said that they couldn't prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was guilty.

by **mistyred** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:00 am

Another thread ruined.

Nice one.

by **tubby** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:03 am

Big Niall wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
Big Niall wrote:A man in his late forties asks you whether he can share his bed with your son of about ten years old. What would you say?

The guy was a paedo scumbag.

Just because he had immense talent (I like some of his music too) doesn't take away the fact that he wanted to "cuddle" up to children in bed and would create a fantasy world to entice them over.

How can the people here overlook this?

A court found him not guilty and was never charged with anything in the end.

He probably had childhood related issues. My take is that he was never allowed to enjoy a normal childhood having been a superstar from such a young age. Also a lot of people would describe him as a 'big kid'. Sure it was a bit quirky but he was not a paedo.

Were you in the bed? No so what makes you an authority on the matter?

B.S

If he wasn't famous there is no way you'd let your child anywhere near him.

That, "I'm just a big child too" or "I love children too much" is what paedophiles convince themselves.

He bought his way out of at least one case. Without the child testifiying, the court just said that they couldn't prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was guilty.

The kids wanted to stay with him becasue he WAS famous. I like ot keep an open mind but I forgot that you are equally as famous as him and had a similar childhood so you obviously know exactly what your talking about dont you? If you don't believe if it fine but don't ruin this thread with this paedo talk.

This is a thread to pay respects and talk about posative things not a :censored:

witch hunt. Isnt there a thread in the gen section where you should be slagging Rafa or his latest signings off?

by **stmichael** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:08 am

Don't Stop Til You Get Enough

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrPTDU40hO4

Thriller (Full 13 min version)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Xs9OQHpwDE

Billie Jean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHoDWc22B0

The way You Make Me Feel (Long version)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJrUa-zKeIc

Beat It

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkGOiS75Lwk

:buttrock

by **tubby** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:11 am

Great idea Mick!

Some oldies

Who's Loving You

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOxIKJTTB2k

I want you back

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfJu_Bom2sA

by **aCe'** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:12 am

His dad used to beat him up and he was exploited by his family ever since he was 5 or so... made alot of money but his childhood as he says was nothing short of a tragedy...
Besides his music, the man has done so much to the world in many different aspects so the least he could get from some of you is some respect, if not sympathy... The whole paedo thing is out of line.. what happened to 'justice' and 'innocent until proven guilty'..etc etc
He was an odd character ill give you that much but imo he was a good person and i for one will remember him as such...

When it comes to music and entertainment, you'd have to be an idiot to dismiss his achievements and contribution to this world...

now beat it !

by **stmichael** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:17 am

One of the most important things someone suffering from mental illness needs is genuine support around him. There is the real possibility that all Jackson had around him were people with a vested interest in keeping him the way he was.

I reserve my judgement on him as a person, but far too many people think they know the in's and out's of his life, what he did and what he should have done, when in reality they have no idea about the details aside from what they've read in tabloids and gossip columns.

by **GYBS** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:19 am

Whatever happened in his childhood is no excuse . He even admitted to have numerous kids in his bed on many times . The court found OJ not guilty of murder as well - doesnt mean they were innocent , the parents were just as much fools leaving kids with them , and then there is the incident of him dangling a scared two month old baby over a balcony floors up. The guy was outstanding musically and there is no denying that , musically people will look up to him but nothing else - as a person he was wrong and definately not an icon .

by **Judge** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:22 am

GYBS wrote:The court found OJ not guilty of murder as well - doesnt mean they were innocent

yeah, fu'ck the judicial system

by **Judge** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:23 am

destro wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
destro wrote:
Big Niall wrote:A man in his late forties asks you whether he can share his bed with your son of about ten years old. What would you say?

The guy was a paedo scumbag.

Just because he had immense talent (I like some of his music too) doesn't take away the fact that he wanted to "cuddle" up to children in bed and would create a fantasy world to entice them over.

How can the people here overlook this?

well said

Whats the difference between Jacko and Alex Ferguson.......Ferguson can still play Giggs next year

What's the difference between a pile of and you? A pile of can be cleaned up.

You blind lad? Jokes go in the joke thread.

Blind...No...didnt take the time to read the whole thread...yes, wind your neck in soft @rse

i tried to google that

by **GYBS** » Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:26 am

Judge wrote:
GYBS wrote:The court found OJ not guilty of murder as well - doesnt mean they were innocent

yeah, fu'ck the judicial system

we all know many innocent people have been sent down and many guilty people have walked away - the evidence is there plain and simple but these guys get away on technicalities brought up by 10 grand a day lawyers .

Liverpool FC Forum

Michael jackson has had an heart attack

Who is online