Liverpool FC Forum

Sabre wrote: LOL I do remember your only moan in 5 years.

I repeat, your *only* moan in 5 years I can remember.

I was thinking more on those regular moaners that are questioning the mod's job every week. Clearly not talking about you.

1 moan in 5 years doesn't make you or anyone a moaner Mick

And relax mate, the fact that I make you an observation every 5 years, doesn't make me an anti Mick neither. 

dawson99 wrote:

Sabre wrote::D LOL I do remember your only moan in 5 years.

I repeat, your *only* moan in 5 years I can remember.

I was thinking more on those regular moaners that are questioning the mod's job every week. Clearly not talking about you.

1 moan in 5 years doesn't make you or anyone a moaner Mick

And relax mate, the fact that I make you an observation every 5 years, doesn't make me an anti Mick neither. 

Maybe they question the mods every week because very week one of the mods does something that stupifies the rest of us...

I honestly think the advanced memebers bit should be kept, but just used better...

And i want the games section back, i had top scores on all of that!

Never mind the Advanced section Dawson....... ask them about the Honours list mate 

Sabre wrote:

Maybe they question the mods every week because very week one of the mods does something that stupifies the rest of us...

Maybe.

But  "the rest of us" must be really "the rest of us", and no "the same old 6-7 moaners".

When mods receive more than 30 complains then they should think they have made a mistake. And in fairness to them, they have asked us what kind of moderation we want, that is, you can't blame them of not listening to the people.

But if it's the same "6-7 moaners" then I wouldn't take much motice of their usual complains. No matter how important these 6-7 guys they think they are.

Talking hypothetically here, I have no idea of what being a mod is like these days. 

ok, there is a section that com,plains too much, a section that complains a fair bit, and a section that just kisses butt.

But there are problems, but we are human, and to err is human.

They do a good job tho, but deserve the same stick i used to give the prefects...

woof woof ! wrote:The advanced menbers section was something I never supported. I thought it would be divisive and although it never caused any major rifts in the forum, that was only because that most members including those that quailified to enter it just f'ucking ignored it.



Now, given the "level" we're at in the forum I find an "Advanced Members" section laughable and frankly embarrassing.

Hopefully we remove it before someone lodges a complaint and we're found guilty of breaching the "Trades Description Act"


Whadya think ?

Dundalk wrote:I think the Advanced Section should go as nobody uses it. It was a very good idea but it lies idle. The rest of the forum should also be used properly or else get rid. For example why dont we use The Games section for exactly that -Games! All Match Threads should go in here and leave General Discussion for other topics. A lot of people complain about the match threads, so stick them in here and thats sorted.

There is a lot of sections, not just the Advanced Debate one that are not used

woof woof ! wrote:Well the "top" topic has had three replies since mid Dec, and the second topic on the menu was last replied to in November.




p.s know this is more about the forum than footy and should maybe be in "Gen Chat" but wanted to get as many opinions as poss.