Liverpool FC Forum

by **dawson99** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:23 pm

puroresu wrote:I think its a joke that chambers cant run. He served his ban, whats the problem? Carl Myerscough is not banned for life even though he tested positive for the Juice. Christine Ohuruogu missed 3 drug tests which to me is as good as being tested positive yet she aint banned.

but he hasnt served his ban, the agreement was: do drugs and you wont ever be in olympics... ergo his ban is in force for good.

let someone compete who actually deserves to go

by **LFC2007** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:03 pm

The Judge saw sense :nod

by **Judge** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:23 pm

LFC2007 wrote:The Judge saw sense

cheers mate

by **LFC2007** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:25 pm

Knew you'd come round

by **Alonso14** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:47 pm

edit.

by **7_Kewell** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:49 pm

probably best he doesn't go. although he's obviously got a huge talent, it wouldn't send out the right signals to other athletes....it would day "hey, if you get caught taking drugs we'll let you off after a couple of years"...and some guys will take that risk.

by **J*o*n*D*o*e** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:07 pm

dont have a problem with the guy getting a second chance myself, can someone tell why he`s only banned from the olympics for life and not athetics as a whole, seems pretty stupid dont you think.

and just because the ruling says baaned from the olympics for life doesnt mean its right and should not be contested, you cannot ban someone from one competition but let him run in another, its a bloody farce.

do we ban drink drivers for life or people who drive drugged up, i could go on but i guess my point is made.

by **LFC2007** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:28 pm

J*o*n*D*o*e wrote:dont have a problem with the guy getting a second chance myself, can someone tell why he`s only banned from the olympics for life and not athetics as a whole, seems pretty stupid dont you think.

and just because the ruling says baaned from the olympics for life doesnt mean its right and should not be contested, you cannot ban someone from one competition but let him run in another, its a bloody farce.

do we ban drink drivers for life or people who drive drugged up, i could go on but i guess my point is made.

It's a British Olympic Association bylaw that prevents him from running, they don't govern the whole of Athletics, only team GB for the olympics. Their bylaw, their right.

He knew it before he took THG (and a host of other drugs), therefore he shouldn't have contested it.

by **J*o*n*D*o*e** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:06 pm

like i said just because its their law doesnt make it right and not to be contested.

the fact only two countries have this law says it all really, most of the world has moved on whilst we drag our feet.

by **LFC2007** » Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm

He knew the rules before taking prohibited substances, he broke the rules knowingly, therefore he has to accept the consequences attached to those rules.

Whether the bylaw is appropriate or not is another question altogether. I don't have an opinion as to whether a lifetime ban from the olympics is an appropriate punishment. The BOA determine their own sanctions, and perhaps they're of the opinion that the changes induced by steroids and the like are long-lasting, enough to affect an athlete throughout their entire career. It's perfectly plausible, and they have the right to determine the basis for such a ban.

by **dawson99** » Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:00 pm

J*o*n*D*o*e wrote:like i said just because its their law doesnt make it right and not to be contested.

the fact only two countries have this law says it all really, most of the world has moved on whilst we drag our feet.

its the rest of the world dragging its feet. we are doing the right thing

by **7_Kewell** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:24 pm

dawson99 wrote:
J*o*n*D*o*e wrote:like i said just because its their law doesnt make it right and not to be contested.

the fact only two countries have this law says it all really, most of the world has moved on whilst we drag our feet.

its the rest of the world dragging its feet. we are doing the right thing

exactly, we're setting an example of him and good job too with the 2012 London games on the way

Liverpool FC Forum

Should chambers run - Well?

Should chambers run - Well?

Who is online