Liverpool FC Forum

by **andy_g** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:29 am

dawson99 wrote:

joyce deserves a place in the 'you shouldn't fancy her....' thread

by **Dundalk** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:04 pm

by **Bad Bob** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:20 pm

woof woof ! wrote:

I've actually got this album

Check out the mustache on that bird!

by **J*o*n*D*o*e** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:07 pm

[Edited: sorry, mate, but this is not workplace safe.]

by **red37** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:55 pm

F**k off!

You lot are making these up :laugh:

by **Kharhaz** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:59 am

by **Kharhaz** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:20 am

[Edited: not work place safe.]

by **Bad Bob** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:25 am

Alright fellas, let's keep this thread clean and work-place safe. No need to be posting album covers up with topless ladies, John Lennon's tackle or worse, Yoko Ono's minge. :no

by **Kharhaz** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:31 am

Bad Bob wrote:Alright fellas, let's keep this thread clean and work-place safe. No need to be posting album covers up with topless ladies, John Lennon's tackle or worse, Yoko Ono's minge.

I didnt release the album they did ! Lets face it, it was in the shops at one point !

by **Bad Bob** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:31 am

Kharhaz wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:Alright fellas, let's keep this thread clean and work-place safe. No need to be posting album covers up with topless ladies, John Lennon's tackle or worse, Yoko Ono's minge.

I didnt release the album they did ! Lets face it, it was in the shops at one point !

Not exactly, mate. According to Wikipedia John and Yoko's experimental album Unifinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins was marked by controversy when released:

"The cover provoked an outrage, prompting distributors to sell the album in a plain brown wrapper. Copies of the album were impounded as obscenity in several jurisdictions (including 30,000 copies in New Jersey). Lennon wryly commented that the uproar seemed to have less to do with the explicit nudity, and more to do with the fact that the pair were rather unattractive (and the photo unflattering; Lennon described it later as a picture of "two slightly overweight ex-junkies"). The album was named so because immediately after recording was finished, John and Yoko consummated their relationship for the first time.[citation needed]

Nevertheless, the taboo-breaking album cover was perhaps the first time that a male celebrity of any consequence had exposed himself so thoroughly to the public."

So, unless you can digitally add the brown paper wrapper, leave it out of this thread.

(FYI - If people really need to see John and Yoko 'in the all together', the above linked Wikipedia page has an image of the album cover in question.)

by **Kharhaz** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:59 am

Fair enough. I from this day forth, will not show any pictures of yoko ! Its only fair on the public !

by **Emerald Red** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:15 am

Hmm, nice bush there Yoko!

by **112-1077774096** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:19 am

Bad Bob wrote:
Kharhaz wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:Alright fellas, let's keep this thread clean and work-place safe. No need to be posting album covers up with topless ladies, John Lennon's tackle or worse, Yoko Ono's minge.

I didnt release the album they did ! Lets face it, it was in the shops at one point !

Not exactly, mate. According to Wikipedia John and Yoko's experimental album Unifinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins was marked by controversy when released:

"The cover provoked an outrage, prompting distributors to sell the album in a plain brown wrapper. Copies of the album were impounded as obscenity in several jurisdictions (including 30,000 copies in New Jersey). Lennon wryly commented that the uproar seemed to have less to do with the explicit nudity, and more to do with the fact that the pair were rather unattractive (and the photo unflattering; Lennon described it later as a picture of "two slightly overweight ex-junkies"). The album was named so because immediately after recording was finished, John and Yoko consummated their relationship for the first time.[citation needed]

Nevertheless, the taboo-breaking album cover was perhaps the first time that a male celebrity of any consequence had exposed himself so thoroughly to the public."

So, unless you can digitally add the brown paper wrapper, leave it out of this thread.

(FYI - If people really need to see John and Yoko 'in the all together', the above linked Wikipedia page has an image of the album cover in question.)

yes, but however feel free to make racist comments or swear freely as that seems to be ok

by **Bad Bob** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:59 pm

peewee wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:
Kharhaz wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:Alright fellas, let's keep this thread clean and work-place safe. No need to be posting album covers up with topless ladies, John Lennon's tackle or worse, Yoko Ono's minge.

I didnt release the album they did ! Lets face it, it was in the shops at one point !

Not exactly, mate. According to Wikipedia John and Yoko's experimental album Unifinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins was marked by controversy when released:

"The cover provoked an outrage, prompting distributors to sell the album in a plain brown wrapper. Copies of the album were impounded as obscenity in several jurisdictions (including 30,000 copies in New Jersey). Lennon wryly commented that the uproar seemed to have less to do with the explicit nudity, and more to do with the fact that the pair were rather unattractive (and the photo unflattering; Lennon described it later as a picture of "two slightly overweight ex-junkies"). The album was named so because immediately after recording was finished, John and Yoko consummated their relationship for the first time.[citation needed]

Nevertheless, the taboo-breaking album cover was perhaps the first time that a male celebrity of any consequence had exposed himself so thoroughly to the public."

So, unless you can digitally add the brown paper wrapper, leave it out of this thread.

(FYI - If people really need to see John and Yoko 'in the all together', the above linked Wikipedia page has an image of the album cover in question.)

yes, but however feel free to make racist comments or swear freely as that seems to be ok

Cheers for the shadow moderating but we've got it under control, thanks.

by **Leonmc0708** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:29 pm

peewee wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:
Kharhaz wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:Alright fellas, let's keep this thread clean and work-place safe. No need to be posting album covers up with topless ladies, John Lennon's tackle or worse, Yoko Ono's minge.

I didnt release the album they did ! Lets face it, it was in the shops at one point !

Not exactly, mate. According to Wikipedia John and Yoko's experimental album Unifinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins was marked by controversy when released:

"The cover provoked an outrage, prompting distributors to sell the album in a plain brown wrapper. Copies of the album were impounded as obscenity in several jurisdictions (including 30,000 copies in New Jersey). Lennon wryly commented that the uproar seemed to have less to do with the explicit nudity, and more to do with the fact that the pair were rather unattractive (and the photo unflattering; Lennon described it later as a picture of "two slightly overweight ex-junkies"). The album was named so because immediately after recording was finished, John and Yoko consummated their relationship for the first time.[citation needed]

Nevertheless, the taboo-breaking album cover was perhaps the first time that a male celebrity of any consequence had exposed himself so thoroughly to the public."

So, unless you can digitally add the brown paper wrapper, leave it out of this thread.

(FYI - If people really need to see John and Yoko 'in the all together', the above linked Wikipedia page has an image of the album cover in question.)

yes, but however feel free to make racist comments or swear freely as that seems to be ok

Liverpool FC Forum

Worst album covers ever

Who is online