Liverpool FC Forum

by **Judge** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:56 pm

s@int wrote:
Judge wrote:
s@int wrote:Gerrard changed my life for the better with his second goal in the cupfinal. I went from deep depression to ecstacy in 2 seconds

s@int you masturbator

======================================
i just watched the game

M*sturbator is such an ugly word I prefer to think of it as executive stress relief. All I need now is a job as an executive, but I have my hands full at the moment

must be a large set of tweezers you are holding

thats what Anfield kop said anyway

by **account deleted by request** » Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:02 pm

Judge wrote:
s@int wrote:
Judge wrote:
s@int wrote:Gerrard changed my life for the better with his second goal in the cupfinal. I went from deep depression to ecstacy in 2 seconds

s@int you masturbator

======================================
i just watched the game

M*sturbator is such an ugly word I prefer to think of it as executive stress relief. All I need now is a job as an executive, but I have my hands full at the moment

must be a large set of tweezers you are holding

thats what Anfield kop said anyway

You shouldnt believe anything she tells you. Especially the bit where you got your "infection" off a toilet seat

by **The Manhattan Project** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:12 am

Barry Ferguson deserves his award.

Just look at his accomplishments:

1- Never appearing in any major international tournament.

2- Moving to Blackburn.

3- Leaving Blackburn.

Clearly the man is a legend.

by **Lando_Griffin** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:57 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:Barry Ferguson deserves his award.

Just look at his accomplishments:

1- Never appearing in any major international tournament.

2- Moving to Blackburn.

3- Leaving Blackburn.

Clearly the man is a legend.

Credit where it's due, TMP - he did leave Blackburn.

That's got to be worth something!?!

by **The Manhattan Project** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:08 am

They can give him a medal...made out of t'at reeeet gud Jack Walker's steeeel!!!"

Which built ta whooooole Eeeeeewud Paaaaarrk by t'itself.

Eeeeeeeeee baaaaaaaaa gumm!!!

by **Crouchamania** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:29 pm

Does that mean Bellamy will get one too? Hes just left Blackburn

by **Cool Hand Luke** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:52 pm

I don’t give a sh1t and I doubt Gerrard does either, he hasn’t done anything worthy of recognition from the queen anyway.

by **Kharhaz** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:27 am

ok ok calm down people ! the queen gives recognition because she is errrrr hang on i know this one....she brings tourism to the country ! lets not mention the terrorists !

by **112-1077774096** » Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:57 am

Kharhaz wrote:ok ok calm down people ! the queen gives recognition because she is errrrr hang on i know this one....she brings tourism to the country ! lets not mention the terrorists !

thanks for coming back on and proving to us all what an intelectual funkwit you are with this well thought out argument.

personally i truly believe the reason you have not posted much is that you are too stupid to remember your password and you have just found it written down on an empty KFC box that has been festering under your bed since 2004 next to your dads porn mag.

if you dont have something sensible to say in a serious debate its better to be quiet. its better to be quiet and let people think your stupid than to open your mouth and prove it

by **Kharhaz** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:55 am

My apologies peewee, i thought i was pointing out the opinion most people have on the Queen as to why she is here, because the only reason i ever hear is she brings tourism to the country, and i just found it ironic how terrorists can hijack a plane and attempt to damage people like us in this country. I posted that comment because these terrorists are now british citizens, i posted that comment because it is the Queens law that makes these decisions. My point? how can we take someone like her seriously?
However like you say....

by **Lando_Griffin** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:02 am

Kharhaz wrote:My apologies peewee, i thought i was pointing out the opinion most people have on the Queen as to why she is here, because the only reason i ever hear is she brings tourism to the country, and i just found it ironic how terrorists can hijack a plane and attempt to damage people like us in this country. I posted that comment because these terrorists are now british citizens, i posted that comment because it is the Queens law that makes these decisions. My point? how can we take someone like her seriously?
However like you say....

SO the Queen makes the laws does she?

Fancy that.

by **Kharhaz** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:10 am

All laws (otherwise known as legislations) are passed by the queen, although the politicians agree as to whether the bill is passed through ultimately it is the queen who decides.

by **The Manhattan Project** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:10 am

All laws (otherwise known as legislations) are passed by the queen, although the politicians agree as to whether the bill is passed through ultimately it is the queen who decides.

Ultimately it is.....and it isn't.

The monarch does sign the laws passed by Parliament, but it's a ceremonial function. The chances that he/she would refuse to sign a decision made by Parliament are pretty much non-existent. Possible, but highly unlikely.

The monarchy isn't just here to attract tourists, but there's also an argument to be made supporting the concept of a head of state who is apolitical, who in theory represents the nation as a whole, above and beyond political lines. This is as opposed to the U.S. system for example, where just over half the people of the country love the head of state (the president) and think he's been sent by god, and the other side of the electorate hate him with a passion. While it's true that some in the UK would prefer a republic, they always tend to be a relatively small segment, compared to the pro-monarchy side (which includes me).

The reason hijackers can come here and claim asylum is down to a government staffed by lawyers, who have a vested interest in passing vague laws and legal conventions which challenge or weaken the courts and their ability to function, creating a "human rights/compensation" culture which lawyers can exploit for profit, regardless of the consequences to British society.

With the honours system, QEII is given a list by the politicians and they are the ones who decides who gets what. I would find it very hard to believe that the Queen decided one day that Barry Ferguson had made a significant contribution to her realm and deserved an award.

by **Judge** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:32 am

Kharhaz wrote:My apologies peewee, i thought i was pointing out the opinion most people have on the Queen as to why she is here, because the only reason i ever hear is she brings tourism to the country, and i just found it ironic how terrorists can hijack a plane and attempt to damage people like us in this country. I posted that comment because these terrorists are now british citizens, i posted that comment because it is the Queens law that makes these decisions. My point? how can we take someone like her seriously?
However like you say....

Queens law ?? it is not, the law is made by commoners elected to parliament matey

read a book :help

by **112-1077774096** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:50 am

manhattan project, well written mate.

but in relation to kharhaz if, we ignore him he might just go away. obviously educated in things other than education

Liverpool FC Forum

Gerrard ignored by the queen again - Barry ferguson, wtf?

Who is online