Liverpool FC Forum

by **woof woof !** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:47 am

One drink too many and you could make the biggest mistake of your life .

by **Ciggy** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:56 am

The one in the middle is a right munter, the other 2 are very pretty for lady boys :suspect:

by **woof woof !** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:03 am

The one on the left is quite attractive (Sh'it and I'm not even drunk yet ! :wwww

)

by **Ciggy** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:11 am

Why are there so many lady boys over there? Can someone explain

They cant be that poor if they are getting ops to turn them into females, is it to get a rich arl western man or what

by **112-1077774096** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:39 am

cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:Why are there so many lady boys over there? Can someone explain They cant be that poor if they are getting ops to turn them into females, is it to get a rich arl western man or what

lynds, there was a study done by a university in england about the femeninity of south east asia men. this is a serious study.

they concluded its due to the diet of soya milk that most people out here drink, it turns them a bit femenine.

a lot of guys are also gay but not katoey (ladyboy).
maybe there is something in that study

by **woof woof !** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:43 am

cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:Why are there so many lady boys over there? Can someone explain

That's a really good question Ciggy , I can't actually explain BUT the asian attitude towards transvestites has always been far more tolerant than that in the west,a man or a boy in a drees in asia is not very likely to be attacked and beaten up ,perhaps that accounts for the apparent numbers of "lady boys" that can be seen in many asian countries (not just thailand) . There is also the economic issue to be considered . In a country that provides ZERO support for the unemployed (of which there are many) many people of all genders often do what they have to in order to survive .

When I owned a bar in Thailand I got to know many girls (not ladyboys) who were "on the game" ,they were however light years removed from the hookers that you would normally associate with that profession and certainly the dream for many of them was to meet a nice man who would take them out of the crappy life they were stuck in and settle down and have some kids.

by **Woollyback** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:01 am

woof woof ! wrote:the dream for many of them was to meet a nice man who would take them out of the crappy life they were stuck in and settle down and have some kids.

yeah baby, they fell for every word of woolly's evil pimpin' lies :eyebrow

by **112-1077774096** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:07 am

Editorial comment on:
"Infant feeding with soy formula milk: Effects on the testis and on blood testosterone levels in marmoset monkeys during the period of neonatal testicular activity." by Richard M. Sharpe et al. Ob Gyn Survey 2003-2;58(2):120-22
Original paper published in Hum Reprod 2002;17:1692-1703
Infants not breastfed are often fed powdered milk formula derived from soybean extracts, often used in the first months of life. Animal studies have been done due to concerns on the high amount of isoflavenoid phytoestrogens in soy products. Plant derived products such as soy may be "natural" but may not be innocuous.

In tests done on Marmoset monkeys twins, animals received either standard cow milk formula or soy milk formula after the first 4-5 days of life. Significant differences were found between the two groups. Leydig cells were increased by almost 75% and the SFM-fed monkeys had a suppression of the testosterone surge.

The authors feel that feeding human infants a soy product in the early months of life can affect plasma testosterone levels and testosterone-dependent tissues in ways that are not yet clear. They concluded that it would be wise to avoid feeding soy products to infants when alternatives are available.

by **Judge** » Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:33 am

woof woof ! wrote:One drink too many and you could make the biggest mistake of your life .

woof, i wish you would stop posting pics from your own personal photo album

by **Lando_Griffin** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:11 am

I reckon I'd have had a crafty shank over the one on the left if the pic had appeared on any other thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by **112-1077774096** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:20 am

Lando_Griffin wrote:I reckon I'd have had a crafty shank over the one on the left if the pic had appeared on any other thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i bet you had a hand shandy over this when you were younger until you realised what it was

go on admit it you little tinker

by **84-1106852058** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:25 am

Katoey................wasnt she the minister for sport?

by **112-1077774096** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:27 am

The Red Baron wrote:Katoey................wasnt she the minister for sport?

classic mate

you sould be forgiven also for thinking that just by looking at her

by **woof woof !** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:27 am

The Red Baron wrote:Katoey................wasnt she the minister for sport?

pmsl .

Kate Hoey , Ladyboy , Ball Juggler and Member of Parliament.

by **Judge** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:38 am

anyone see the new little britain last night with Ting tong the katoey

Liverpool FC Forum

Jonnymac - Dirty dog haha

Who is online