Liverpool FC Forum

by **taff** » Thu Apr 14, 2005 3:06 pm

Answer honestly
By giving an honest answer you will be able to test where you stand
morally. The test features an unlikely, completely fictional situation,
where you will have to make a decision one way or the other. Remember
that your answer needs to be honest, yet spontaneous. Consider each line
- this is important for the test to work accurately.
You're in Manchester. . .
There is great chaos going on around you, caused by a hurricane and
severe floods.
There are huge masses of water all over you . . .
You are a CNN Photographer and you are in the middle of this great
disaster. The situation is nearly hopeless.
You're trying to shoot very impressive photos. There are houses and
people floating around you, disappearing into the water. Nature is
showing all its destructive power and is ripping everything away with
it.
Suddenly you see a man in the water; he is fighting for his life, trying
not to be taken away by the masses of water and mud. You move closer,
the man looks familiar.
Suddenly you know who it is - it's Sir Alex Ferguson
At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to take him
away. . . forever. You have two options. You can save him or you can
take the best photo of your life. You can save the life of Sir Alex
Ferguson, or you can shoot a Pulitzer Prize winning photo. A unique
photo displaying the last moments of the Premierships most successful
manager in the last 14 years
And here's the question: (Please give an honest answer).......

Would you select Kodak colour film (ISO 400), or go with the simplicity
of classic black and white?

by **chiggz_likes_owen** » Thu Apr 14, 2005 5:13 pm

Considering I would come out alive as well, save him

by **84-1106852058** » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:28 pm

Nice one taff:)

by **LFC #1** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:11 am

chiggz_likes_owen wrote:Considering I would come out alive as well, save him

bollox to him.

by **112-1077774096** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:29 am

i think colour to just get that extra redness in his face

by **Lando_Griffin** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:37 am

Only a pity we can't have video to see and hear him scream. The ****** would still be looking at his watch!

by **woof woof !** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 6:42 am

Neither , you give mother nature a hand by throwing your camera at him, knocking him unconcious .

by **Judge** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 7:58 am

i agree with woof

by **112-1077774096** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 8:27 am

The Return of the Judge wrote:i agree with woof

i dont, surely he would suffer more if he was conscious

by **Judge** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 8:30 am

peewee wrote:
The Return of the Judge wrote:i agree with woof

i dont, surely he would suffer more if he was concious

what is concious??

by **112-1077774096** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 8:43 am

The Return of the Judge wrote:
peewee wrote:
The Return of the Judge wrote:i agree with woof

i dont, surely he would suffer more if he was concious

what is concious??

i cant believe you altered my spelling to get a cheap laugh

by **Judge** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 8:47 am

cheeky fuc'ker

by **hawkmoon269** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:54 am

I think I'd use my Nikon D2X digital

by **Judge** » Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:01 am

hawkmoon269 wrote:I think I'd use my Nikon D2X digital

you only got a cheap camera then?? :laugh:

Liverpool FC Forum

Morals - Choice

Who is online