"Culpable homicide" has been defined simply as "the unlawful negligent killing of a human being".
damjan193 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 6:22 pm wrote:I haven't been following this, is he going to walk just like that? Surely he can be convicted with manslaughter or something? He still killed a person and intended to kill a person.
LFC1990 » Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:41 pm wrote:damjan193 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 6:22 pm wrote:I haven't been following this, is he going to walk just like that? Surely he can be convicted with manslaughter or something? He still killed a person and intended to kill a person.
According to the judge there was no proof he meant to kill anyone
Ben Patrick » Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:08 pm wrote:LFC1990 » Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:41 pm wrote:damjan193 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 6:22 pm wrote:I haven't been following this, is he going to walk just like that? Surely he can be convicted with manslaughter or something? He still killed a person and intended to kill a person.
According to the judge there was no proof he meant to kill anyone
That is the part that is annoying me the most.
How the fck could there be proof that he meant to kill someone ?
Unless we have access to his thoughts at the time that is.
However the fact is he fired a gun FOUR times through a locked door.
Whoever he was aiming at had not posed any threat to him prior to the shooting.
For me he should be doing 25 years.
dawson99 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:25 pm wrote:
Sham of a mockery wrapped inside a mockery inside another bigger sham.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests