Liverpool FC Forum

Benny The Noon » Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:27 pm wrote:

parchpea » Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:29 pm wrote:I would like to think they are commited to purchase after the loan but I suspect its
first refusal with a price agreed already. West Ham wouldnt be that daft surely.

Even if they want him, which I doubt, then he must agree personal terms and that would
be a drop in wages for Carroll as hes not worth what we are paying him.

Both parties hoped he would do enough to instigate this deal however he has been injured
and shyte since he went there, an all too familiar pattern for Carroll these days.

Why do you doubt they want him when they chased him all summer and then the chairmen comes out and says a deal with us has already been sorted

Oh and he hasn't been ***** for them - just scored the winner for them. With him they were playing well - without him they only won one league game in 2 and a half months until he is now back.

parchpea » Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:24 pm wrote:

Benny The Noon » Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:27 pm wrote:

parchpea » Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:29 pm wrote:I would like to think they are commited to purchase after the loan but I suspect its
first refusal with a price agreed already. West Ham wouldnt be that daft surely.

Even if they want him, which I doubt, then he must agree personal terms and that would
be a drop in wages for Carroll as hes not worth what we are paying him.

Both parties hoped he would do enough to instigate this deal however he has been injured
and shyte since he went there, an all too familiar pattern for Carroll these days.

Why do you doubt they want him when they chased him all summer and then the chairmen comes out and says a deal with us has already been sorted

Oh and he hasn't been ***** for them - just scored the winner for them. With him they were playing well - without him they only won one league game in 2 and a half months until he is now back.

He scored and played well today by all accounts but that was after my post. I dont think
hes been a big influence for them overall though.

Its one game and if he can maintain that between now and the end of the season I will
be made up to see West Ham pay £15m or more.

See how it goes.

RED BEERGOGGLES » Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:32 pm wrote:The Big Man was excellent in every respect today ,Swansea simply couldn't handle him . I for one would definitely love to see him back at the reds .

Benny The Noon » Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:50 pm wrote:

RED BEERGOGGLES » Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:32 pm wrote:The Big Man was excellent in every respect today ,Swansea simply couldn't handle him . I for one would definitely love to see him back at the reds .

He won't play for us again

Benny The Noon » Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:50 pm wrote:

RED BEERGOGGLES » Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:32 pm wrote:The Big Man was excellent in every respect today ,Swansea simply couldn't handle him . I for one would definitely love to see him back at the reds .

He won't play for us again

RED BEERGOGGLES » Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:32 pm wrote:The Big Man was excellent in every respect today ,Swansea simply couldn't handle him . I for one would definitely love to see him back at the reds .

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:04 am wrote:

RED BEERGOGGLES » Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:32 pm wrote:The Big Man was excellent in every respect today ,Swansea simply couldn't handle him . I for one would definitely love to see him back at the reds .

i`d like to see him back myself but it`s not going to happen whilst rodgers is in charge.

maguskwt » Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:34 am wrote:If we want to play big sam style... sure he's useful... any other style he's Sh*t....
He's out of the picture now anyway after we bought Sturridge....

ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:45 pm wrote:

maguskwt » Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:34 am wrote:If we want to play big sam style... sure he's useful... any other style he's Sh*t....
He's out of the picture now anyway after we bought Sturridge....

just because you have a big target man doesnt mean you have to play ale house football, we never played ale house football when we had john toshack in the 70`s and we certainly didnt play ale house footy when we had john aldridge leading the line in the late 80`s.

crim cram » Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:27 am wrote:I haven't seen much of him this season, but he was useless today against Villa.  I hope he's sold for good money but we'll probably lose 20 -28 million on his fee. I would be shocked if we sell him for more than 8-9 million.  He's a frustrating player, can't trap a ball properly, has all sorts of problems with the ball at his feet.  I wish the lad the best, but not at LFC.

The Good Yank » Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:53 pm wrote:

crim cram » Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:27 am wrote:I haven't seen much of him this season, but he was useless today against Villa.  I hope he's sold for good money but we'll probably lose 20 -28 million on his fee. I would be shocked if we sell him for more than 8-9 million.  He's a frustrating player, can't trap a ball properly, has all sorts of problems with the ball at his feet.  I wish the lad the best, but not at LFC.

I didn't think he was all that bad today.  Was dominant in the air and had some decent hold up play.  Had a certain goal saved by Darren Bent.  We'll get whatever the agreed fee with West Ham is, I'd guess 15 mill or so.