Liverpool FC Forum

by **Emerald Red** » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:15 pm

In and Out wrote:
andy_g wrote:in what sense do you think these artists are forsaking the artistry and the science of art? how would you define the artistry and the science of art, in fact? do you have any examples?

Would his 'arty' sig contradict his own statement?

I wonder.

There's no contradiction whatsoever there. Oh, do you mean I used a computer? Hmmm, no. Still can't see a contradiction as I still haven't explained my reasoning behind what I wrote. Andy sort of touched on it with the developments of chemicals and pigments. That's part of what I was hinting at.

by **Emerald Red** » Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:23 pm

In and Out wrote:
andy_g wrote:we could say that every minute manipulation of material by humans (or any other animal) is technology if we wanted to get properly picky about it

I don't really understand what ER was trying to say.

Whenever you think of a masterpiece regarding art, what kind of art, or what specific example first jumps into your head, and why do you consider it a masterpiece?

by **destro** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:43 am

WTF ! Am I in the wrong forum

by **Emerald Red** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:09 am

destro wrote: WTF ! Am I in the wrong forum

I prefere your Google symbol to the one this thread is about.

Liverpool FC Forum

Google - buckyball and nanotechnology - Good or bad

Who is online