Liverpool FC Forum

Judge wrote:

i'd ban this ugly sod, whoever he is

JBG wrote:

solja_slim wrote:after all the bannings,you just end up with a group of similar minded individuals agreeing on mostly everything

Beats the purpose of having a discussion board if you ban people with views contadicting the general views of the frequent posters on the boards.

This is by far the best LFC forum i have been to in terms of the way it is designed ,the ease of navigating through the posts and the ability to display graphics.

Its a free forum so its badly moderated and people are banned at the MODS whims.Thats why there are over a thousand registered members yet only couple a dozen are active members....probably due to banning.

It would be nice to start a category of paid up members,those willing to contibute so as to keep the forum well moderated and free to everyone else who cannot pay.

Thoughts....

You have 8 posts, a number of which are criticisms of the board and how it is run and also one or two about Mudface, who was banned before you joined.

Stinks to high heavens. 

jonnymac1979 wrote:

JBG wrote:

solja_slim wrote:after all the bannings,you just end up with a group of similar minded individuals agreeing on mostly everything

Beats the purpose of having a discussion board if you ban people with views contadicting the general views of the frequent posters on the boards.

This is by far the best LFC forum i have been to in terms of the way it is designed ,the ease of navigating through the posts and the ability to display graphics.

Its a free forum so its badly moderated and people are banned at the MODS whims.Thats why there are over a thousand registered members yet only couple a dozen are active members....probably due to banning.

It would be nice to start a category of paid up members,those willing to contibute so as to keep the forum well moderated and free to everyone else who cannot pay.

Thoughts....

You have 8 posts, a number of which are criticisms of the board and how it is run and also one or two about Mudface, who was banned before you joined.

Stinks to high heavens. 

Got there before me.

Solja Slim, you're on my watch list now. 

Thoughts...

dawson99 wrote:and ban me

me also 

Sabre wrote:IP address means nothing, I post with many different IP addresses, due to, erm, sometimes I post in work

This guy has an awful look to Mudface:

* He gives lessons of how to be a real supporter, and criticises the foreigners accusing them of being bandwagon supporters

* When people do not agree, he says we all think the same way, ignoring facts like I disagree and enjoy the discussion about morientes with BM, we disagree in general chat issues like the downloading is wrong, and so on , and so on. He's just the kind of guy that takes other's different oppinions as a personal insult.

* He also seems to be an A class troll, this kind of troll thinks that he's more clever than the other trolls and try to avoid banning by avoiding direct insults.

Sounds like Stu the red to me 

Incidentally, watched 'You're on Skysports last night, first caller Stuart Hunt from Liverpool, slated Cisse, and then went on to proclaim Peter Crouch as a world beater, had all the hallmarks of a Stu rant to me   

maximus wrote:Incidentally, watched 'You're on Skysports last night, first caller Stuart Hunt from Liverpool, slated Cisse, and then went on to proclaim Peter Crouch as a world beater, had all the hallmarks of a Stu rant to me   

did he tell whoever was on the panel to "get a clue about football?"

stmichael wrote:

maximus wrote:Incidentally, watched 'You're on Skysports last night, first caller Stuart Hunt from Liverpool, slated Cisse, and then went on to proclaim Peter Crouch as a world beater, had all the hallmarks of a Stu rant to me   

did he tell whoever was on the panel to "get a clue about football?"

Put it this way, he did not let Gary Newbon, Peter Beagrie or Steve Claridge get a word in edge ways, when they dared speak!!   

jonnymac1979 wrote:

JBG wrote:

solja_slim wrote:after all the bannings,you just end up with a group of similar minded individuals agreeing on mostly everything

Beats the purpose of having a discussion board if you ban people with views contadicting the general views of the frequent posters on the boards.

This is by far the best LFC forum i have been to in terms of the way it is designed ,the ease of navigating through the posts and the ability to display graphics.

Its a free forum so its badly moderated and people are banned at the MODS whims.Thats why there are over a thousand registered members yet only couple a dozen are active members....probably due to banning.

It would be nice to start a category of paid up members,those willing to contibute so as to keep the forum well moderated and free to everyone else who cannot pay.

Thoughts....

You have 8 posts, a number of which are criticisms of the board and how it is run and also one or two about Mudface, who was banned before you joined.

Stinks to high heavens. 

Got there before me.

Solja Slim, you're on my watch list now. 

Thoughts...

i think that you should go back to school dunder head 

I just said this is a well put up web site that has lots of potential.
I am a paid subscriber at the liverpoolfc.tv eseason ticket forum but i like to get around most of the free boards just to widen my perspective on things.
You can also find me on theroadend.co.uk ,RAWk and koptalk.

Am not here to wind people up as you can see from my post count.

What i meant in my earlier post is that this site has better structure that that of the official site.You can do more things here like posting images that you cannot do on the official site.

I was wondering,is it possible to set up a forum,similar to eseason,that has paid up subscribers and is well moderated plus tolerant to well behaved members with divergent views(even manc and botters!).

Your ordinary crowd will surely slate me for this post as they will not be willing to pay a single cent towards maintining this site.