

bigmick wrote:It's strange but I sense there is a bit of a change of mood amongst some posters. Bizarrely as a fully paid up anti (actually rotationally speaking only but I seem to get lumped in with anyone who's anti anything these days) I'm finding a few posters with whom I've locked horns in the past, posting up some odd stuff which is more anti than me![]()
I've had a couple of little centretemps with Rushie in the past, and there's one or two others who's tone has just slightly moved I think. It's strange because although the substitutions were possibly a bit defensive, I really can't lay too much blame myself at Rafa's door for the Everton result. We ought to have won the game despite not playing well, and would have if we had defended the set piece better. Now due to excellent defensive coaching we normally don't concede from set-pieces, it just so happens that this time a couple of players went to kip. It happens but you can't really blame the manager I don't think. If we were conceding set piece goals all over the place fair enough, but we don't.
As for the subs, you could argue that we might have brought Babel on (I did). To be fair though, there have been occasions when he has come on and been absolutely fecking useless so I'm not going to make a big thing about it. More strange I think was not bringing Masherano on when we took Keane off. That would have let us go into a standard 4-5-1 and I'm fairly sure we'd have boxed the game off. All that said though, they barely made a chance in the last 20 minutes aside from the goal and had the game petered out 1-0, nobody would have mentioned the subs at all.
The main issue for Rafa was the front two. Now Keane was absolutely anonymous so to be honest I think the manager showed a fair bit of faith on this occasion by giving him an hour. he was awful and there surely aren't many people who would have kept him on. Similarly, Torres was absolutely out on his feet, and if anything needed to come off sooner.
No, for me the subs is a bit of a red herring. We never really got going, we had the look of a team which hadn't played together for a long time which is exactly what we were. One of those things, the result is only massively disappointing because of what's gone before.
bigmick wrote:Well in answer to your question Rushie, it's A) for me as I've said, but I'm simply saying I'm not sure it made that much difference. There's no certainty that even if you have babel on they aren't going to win a free kick, and if you defend it like we did you are going to concede a goal.
I'm not necessarily defending Rafa here (and lets face it I'd be the first one whinging if I thought there was good cause), but although I didn't agree with the subs wholeheartedly I don't think they were a huge factor in us not winning the game. Quite simply we just defended a set piece poorly, and the player that many of us have been imploring the manager to leave on for a bit longer was the principal culprit.
we all dream... wrote:As you can tell with all the's i had a bad night.
bigmick wrote:It's strange but I sense there is a bit of a change of mood amongst some posters. Bizarrely as a fully paid up anti (actually rotationally speaking only but I seem to get lumped in with anyone who's anti anything these days) I'm finding a few posters with whom I've locked horns in the past, posting up some odd stuff which is more anti than me![]()
I've had a couple of little centretemps with Rushie in the past, and there's one or two others who's tone has just slightly moved I think. It's strange because although the substitutions were possibly a bit defensive, I really can't lay too much blame myself at Rafa's door for the Everton result. We ought to have won the game despite not playing well, and would have if we had defended the set piece better. Now due to excellent defensive coaching we normally don't concede from set-pieces, it just so happens that this time a couple of players went to kip. It happens but you can't really blame the manager I don't think. If we were conceding set piece goals all over the place fair enough, but we don't.
As for the subs, you could argue that we might have brought Babel on (I did). To be fair though, there have been occasions when he has come on and been absolutely fecking useless so I'm not going to make a big thing about it. More strange I think was not bringing Masherano on when we took Keane off. That would have let us go into a standard 4-5-1 and I'm fairly sure we'd have boxed the game off. All that said though, they barely made a chance in the last 20 minutes aside from the goal and had the game petered out 1-0, nobody would have mentioned the subs at all.
The main issue for Rafa was the front two. Now Keane was absolutely anonymous so to be honest I think the manager showed a fair bit of faith on this occasion by giving him an hour. he was awful and there surely aren't many people who would have kept him on. Similarly, Torres was absolutely out on his feet, and if anything needed to come off sooner.
No, for me the subs is a bit of a red herring. We never really got going, we had the look of a team which hadn't played together for a long time which is exactly what we were. One of those things, the result is only massively disappointing because of what's gone before.
LegBarnes wrote:Judge wrote:blame benayounagreed and rafa of course !
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 85 guests