
Owzat wrote:"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts" - basically no one draw was more or most costly, they collectively cost us. I don't even subscribe to theories that the timing might make one more costly than another as it is 22 points dropped over 35 games and we've not won more than five in a row all season anyhow. As I said elsewhere, we've drawn more games this season and last than the champions have in the past FOUR seasons. We're basically drawing twice as often as the champions usually do and thats too many.
Interestingly enough, in the old two points for a win system we'd be level
Man Utd : P34 W25 D5 L4 PTS 80 (55 points if two for a win)
Liverpool : P35 W22 D11 L2 PTS 77 (55 points if two for a win)
Obviously they'd still have a game in hand, but it shows the costliness of draws these days under a three points for a win system.
john craig wrote:Obviously the draws are important.
However nobody is mentioning the 3 points thrown away at Spurs in the last 20 mins and the 3 points gifted to Boro after Xabi's og when we looked like we'd given up on the league.
On balance I'd say that Boro game was more significant than a lot of the draws. The truth is though that it's several results, not just one, that has us in the position we're in. No point looking back now though imo.
Bad Bob wrote:(1) Aston Villa 0 - 0 LFC (Aug. 31st) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
(2) LFC 0 - 0 Stoke (Sept. 20) [BM=2nd, AM=3rd]
(3) LFC 0 - 0 Fulham (Nov. 22) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
(4) LFC 0 - 0 West Ham (Dec. 1) [BM=2nd, AM=1st]
(5) LFC 2 - 2 Hull City (Dec. 13) [BM=1st, AM=1st]
(6) Arsenal 1 - 1 LFC (Dec. 21) [BM=1st, AM=1st]
(7) Stoke 0 - 0 LFC (Jan. 10) [BM=1st, AM=1st]
(8) LFC 1 - 1 Everton (Jan. 19) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
(9) Wigan 1 - 1 LFC (Jan. 28) [BM=2nd, AM=3rd]
(10) LFC 1 - 1 Man City (Feb. 22) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
(11) LFC 4 - 4 Arsenal (April 21) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
Number 9 wrote:john craig wrote:Obviously the draws are important.
However nobody is mentioning the 3 points thrown away at Spurs in the last 20 mins and the 3 points gifted to Boro after Xabi's og when we looked like we'd given up on the league.
On balance I'd say that Boro game was more significant than a lot of the draws. The truth is though that it's several results, not just one, that has us in the position we're in. No point looking back now though imo.
I mentioned them both Dougie Howser!!
Do I need an appointment for ya to read my shi'te??
Bad Bob wrote:(1) Aston Villa 0 - 0 LFC (Aug. 31st) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
(2) LFC 0 - 0 Stoke (Sept. 20) [BM=2nd, AM=3rd]
(3) LFC 0 - 0 Fulham (Nov. 22) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
(4) LFC 0 - 0 West Ham (Dec. 1) [BM=2nd, AM=1st]
(5) LFC 2 - 2 Hull City (Dec. 13) [BM=1st, AM=1st]
(6) Arsenal 1 - 1 LFC (Dec. 21) [BM=1st, AM=1st]
(7) Stoke 0 - 0 LFC (Jan. 10) [BM=1st, AM=1st]
(8) LFC 1 - 1 Everton (Jan. 19) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
(9) Wigan 1 - 1 LFC (Jan. 28) [BM=2nd, AM=3rd]
(10) LFC 1 - 1 Man City (Feb. 22) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
(11) LFC 4 - 4 Arsenal (April 21) [BM=2nd, AM=2nd]
JoeTerp wrote:I'll think your doing a little bit of revisionist history there BigMick. It wasn't like Skrtel was picked to play rightback on a hunch. Arbeloa was not available, neither was Darby or Degen. Carra allegedly refused to play right back and in that Pompey match when there was also a whole mess of people not available, Skrtel played fairly well on the right side of a back three. In hindsight, we probably should have played Mascherano at right back like we did the next week against Sunderland. Further, a lot of the resting against Pompey was not delayed gazelle resting, it was actual resting as a lot players looked very tired at the end of the extra time loss to Everton just days before, and I think we were unlucky to even be in a position to have to come back from in the first place.
and as far as playing two holding players too often, we have not dropped a single point in the league when Mascherano, Alonso, Gerrard, and Torres have all started
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 75 guests