
red37 wrote:Who's this again now......![]()
(Red shouts loudly through megafone)
"EH...CLUEDO..............LEAVE OUR SOPH ALONE!.........................ALL IN ALL YOUR JUST A' NOTHER PR1CK ON NEWKIT"
sophe_lfc_4_lyf wrote:They could of maybe killed him like a nicer way?
BarryBelfast wrote:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7532034279766935521
Heres the vid !!
zarababe wrote:Yes 3 years almost to the day he was caught, and during (and before) Iraq has been annilated, british and american troops are no nearer a pull out having entered as a liberating force, no WMD found, Civil War ensues, over a 1 milion children are dying from malnutrition and diseases such as cholera, are prevalent.
Saddam is dead, but who will be held to account for the annhilation of "I..rak", is this not one of the gravest humanitarian disasters?
Yes removing him was needed, but the destruction of a nation on the back of the myth of WMD well.. this ain't the end.
Things are gonna get a lot lot worse.
The Manhattan Project wrote:All he had to do was sell us some cheap oil, agree not to invade neighbouring countries or develop WMD's, and we would have gladly kept him in power.
But he foolishly didn't take that route.
Idiot.
jkop wrote:I would have loved saddam to be slowly tortured and left to rot in a 6 by 6 cell, but like a lot of other people ill not lose any sleep over his hanging. Good riddance!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests